ObinutuzumabGazyva
Treatment of adult patients with active class III or IV lupus nephritis with or without class V disease who are receiving standard therapy with mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids.
Decisions on record
- Meeting Mar 2026 Recommended Lupus nephritis
- Meeting Jul 2018 Recommended Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL)
- Meeting Apr 2018 Recommended CD20 positive follicular lymphoma no PSD
- Meeting Mar 2018 Deferred CD20 positive follicular lymphoma
- Meeting Nov 2017 Not recommended CD20 positive follicular lymphoma
- Meeting Nov 2016 Not recommended Follicular lymphoma (FL)
- Meeting Mar 2015 Recommended Previously untreated CD20 positive chronic lymphocytic leukaemia
- Meeting Jul 2014 Not recommended Gazyva® Roche Products Pty Ltd New listing (Major submission) Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia Section 100 (Efficient Funding of Chemotherapy Program) Authority required listing for the treatment, in combination with chlorambucil, of patients with previously untreated CD20 positive chronic lymphocytic
Access path
- TGA registered · Gazyva
TGA label narrower than the PBS population
- Jul 2014Not recommended
vs chlorambucil monotherapy (primary); rituximab plus…
- ↻ resubmittedMar 2015Recommended · restricted
Comparator changed: chlorambucil monotherapy (primary); rituximab plus chlorambucil…
- Nov 2016Not recommended
Comparator changed: rituximab plus chlorambucil, chlorambucil monotherapy → bendamustine…
- Nov 2017Not recommended
Comparator changed: bendamustine monotherapy (as proxy for best supportive care) →…
- ↻ resubmittedMar 2018Recommended · restricted
- Jul 2018Recommended · restricted
Evidence: RCT → Cost-minimisation
- Mar 2026Recommended · restricted
Comparator changed: ofatumumab, rituximab → standard therapy (glucocorticoids and…
- PBS listing · Authority Required
From the public summary
7.1 The PBAC recommended obinutuzumab for the treatment of patients with active class III or IV lupus nephritis with or without class V who are receiving standard therapy with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and corticosteroid, on the basis that it should be available only under special arrangements under Section 100 under the Highly Specialised Drugs (HSD) program. The PBAC considered that obinutuzumab was 49 OFFICIALPSD · Mar 2026
OFFICIAL Public Summary Document - March 2026 PBAC Meeting associated with improvements in complete renal response (CRR), CRR with prednisone taper and proteinuric response compared with standard therapy alone.PSD · Mar 2026
6.32 The submission presented a stepped cost-utility analysis of obinutuzumab plus standard therapy (glucocorticoids and MMF) compared to standard therapy alone (herein obinutuzumab arm and SOC arm, respectively), primarily based on the REGENCY trial, with long-term extrapolation based on observational data from the US-based Hopkins Lupus Cohort (Davidson et al., 201818) and Australia and New Zealand dialysis and transplant registry (ANZDATA 202419).PSD · Mar 2026
Table 6: Summary of model structure, key inputs and rationale Component Summary Treatments Obinutuzumab plus SOC (obinutuzumab arm) vs SOC alone (SOC arm) 20 years in the model base case versus 76 weeks in REGENCY.PSD · Mar 2026
6.27 The submission described obinutuzumab plus SOC (MMF plus glucocorticoids) as superior in terms of effectiveness and inferior in terms of safety compared with placebo plus SOC in patients with class III/IV ± V lupus nephritis.PSD · Mar 2026
6.28 The evaluation considered that overall, the clinical claim for superior efficacy versus placebo may be reasonable, however the following issues were noted: 23 OFFICIALPSD · Mar 2026
4.1 The PBAC noted and welcomed the input from individuals (1) and organisations (1) via the Consumer Comments facility on the PBS website. The comments described the fear of relapse as a significant mental and physiological challenge. Lymphoma Australia outlined the importance of having a range of therapeutic options given that patients often experience multiple relapses.PSD · Mar 2018
4.31 The resubmission did not propose a risk sharing arrangement stating that there was no additional impact on PBS budget. However, the PBAC considered that an additional budget impact would be associated with the listing of obinutuzumab in rituximab-refractory follicular lymphoma.PSD · Mar 2018
Cost-effectiveness
ICER value redacted (commercial-in-confidence)
The submission presented a cost-effectiveness analysis of obinutuzumab plus bendamustine compared with bendamustine monotherapy. PSD · 2016
Decision context
PopulationAdult patients with confirmed active class III or IV lupus nephritis with or without class V, eGFR ≥30 mL/min per 1.73 m², UPCR ≥113 mg/mmol, receiving standard therapy with mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids.
Submission history
| Decided | Outcome | Comparator | ICER | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2026 | Recommended · restricted | standard therapy (glucocorticoids and mycophenolate mofetil) | $35k–45k | RCT · CRR |
| Jul 2018 | Recommended · restricted | ofatumumab, rituximab | — | Cost-minimisation |
| Mar 2018 | Recommended · restricted | — | — | RCT |
| Nov 2017 | Not recommended | rituximab in combination with chemotherapy for induction treatment and rituximab monotherapy for maintenance treatment | — | RCT · PFS |
| Nov 2016 | Not recommended | bendamustine monotherapy (as proxy for best supportive care) | — | RCT · PFS |
| Mar 2015 | Recommended · restricted | rituximab plus chlorambucil, chlorambucil monotherapy | — | RCT · PFS |
| Jul 2014 | Not recommended | chlorambucil monotherapy (primary); rituximab plus chlorambucil (secondary) | $15k–45k | RCT · PFS |
Clinical evidence
| Trial | Phase | N | Primary outcome | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLL11 | Ph 3 | 787 | Progression-free Survival (PFS) | completed |
Consumer voice
One individual and one organisation (Lymphoma Australia) provided input describing the fear of relapse as a significant mental and physiological challenge, and emphasising the importance of having a range of therapeutic options given that patients often experience multiple relapses.
The comments described the fear of relapse as a significant mental and physiological challenge. Consumer comments · PSD
Similar precedents
Regulatory · TGA
Label narrower than PBS population — PBAC restricts to patients with comorbidities/unfitness for fludarabine therapy and specific lab parameters; TGA label has no such restrictions.