← The record

ObinutuzumabGazyva

Recommended RheumatologyAuthority Required 💬 consumer voice

Treatment of adult patients with active class III or IV lupus nephritis with or without class V disease who are receiving standard therapy with mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids.

7
Submissions
4 resub
2014–26
On the record
$15k–45k
ICER range
2 sourced ICERs · 2014–2026
Redacted
Cost basis

Decisions on record

8 decisions
  • Meeting Mar 2026 Recommended Lupus nephritis
  • Meeting Jul 2018 Recommended Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL)
  • Meeting Apr 2018 Recommended CD20 positive follicular lymphoma no PSD
  • Meeting Mar 2018 Deferred CD20 positive follicular lymphoma
  • Meeting Nov 2017 Not recommended CD20 positive follicular lymphoma
  • Meeting Nov 2016 Not recommended Follicular lymphoma (FL)
  • Meeting Mar 2015 Recommended Previously untreated CD20 positive chronic lymphocytic leukaemia
  • Meeting Jul 2014 Not recommended Gazyva® Roche Products Pty Ltd New listing (Major submission) Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia Section 100 (Efficient Funding of Chemotherapy Program) Authority required listing for the treatment, in combination with chlorambucil, of patients with previously untreated CD20 positive chronic lymphocytic

Access path

7 submissions · public record
  1. TGA registered · Gazyva

    TGA label narrower than the PBS population

  2. Jul 2014
    Not recommended

    vs chlorambucil monotherapy (primary); rituximab plus…

  3. ↻ resubmitted
    Mar 2015
    Recommended · restricted

    Comparator changed: chlorambucil monotherapy (primary); rituximab plus chlorambucil…

  4. Nov 2016
    Not recommended

    Comparator changed: rituximab plus chlorambucil, chlorambucil monotherapy → bendamustine…

  5. Nov 2017
    Not recommended

    Comparator changed: bendamustine monotherapy (as proxy for best supportive care) →…

  6. ↻ resubmitted
    Mar 2018
    Recommended · restricted
  7. Jul 2018
    Recommended · restricted

    Evidence: RCT → Cost-minimisation

  8. Mar 2026
    Recommended · restricted

    Comparator changed: ofatumumab, rituximab → standard therapy (glucocorticoids and…

  9. PBS listing · Authority Required
RecommendedDeferredNot recommended

From the public summary

Verbatim · PSD text · may span indications
PBAC outcome
7.1 The PBAC recommended obinutuzumab for the treatment of patients with active class III or IV lupus nephritis with or without class V who are receiving standard therapy with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and corticosteroid, on the basis that it should be available only under special arrangements under Section 100 under the Highly Specialised Drugs (HSD) program. The PBAC considered that obinutuzumab was 49 OFFICIALPSD · Mar 2026
OFFICIAL Public Summary Document - March 2026 PBAC Meeting associated with improvements in complete renal response (CRR), CRR with prednisone taper and proteinuric response compared with standard therapy alone.PSD · Mar 2026
Economic analysis
6.32 The submission presented a stepped cost-utility analysis of obinutuzumab plus standard therapy (glucocorticoids and MMF) compared to standard therapy alone (herein obinutuzumab arm and SOC arm, respectively), primarily based on the REGENCY trial, with long-term extrapolation based on observational data from the US-based Hopkins Lupus Cohort (Davidson et al., 201818) and Australia and New Zealand dialysis and transplant registry (ANZDATA 202419).PSD · Mar 2026
Table 6: Summary of model structure, key inputs and rationale Component Summary Treatments Obinutuzumab plus SOC (obinutuzumab arm) vs SOC alone (SOC arm) 20 years in the model base case versus 76 weeks in REGENCY.PSD · Mar 2026
Clinical claim
6.27 The submission described obinutuzumab plus SOC (MMF plus glucocorticoids) as superior in terms of effectiveness and inferior in terms of safety compared with placebo plus SOC in patients with class III/IV ± V lupus nephritis.PSD · Mar 2026
6.28 The evaluation considered that overall, the clinical claim for superior efficacy versus placebo may be reasonable, however the following issues were noted: 23 OFFICIALPSD · Mar 2026
Consumer comments
4.1 The PBAC noted and welcomed the input from individuals (1) and organisations (1) via the Consumer Comments facility on the PBS website. The comments described the fear of relapse as a significant mental and physiological challenge. Lymphoma Australia outlined the importance of having a range of therapeutic options given that patients often experience multiple relapses.PSD · Mar 2018
Financial management – risk sharing
4.31 The resubmission did not propose a risk sharing arrangement stating that there was no additional impact on PBS budget. However, the PBAC considered that an additional budget impact would be associated with the listing of obinutuzumab in rituximab-refractory follicular lymphoma.PSD · Mar 2018

Cost-effectiveness

2 sourced ICERs · 2014–2026

ICER value redacted (commercial-in-confidence)

The submission presented a cost-effectiveness analysis of obinutuzumab plus bendamustine compared with bendamustine monotherapy. PSD · 2016
ICER uncertain ×2Economic model disputed ×3Surrogate endpoint

Decision context

PopulationAdult patients with confirmed active class III or IV lupus nephritis with or without class V, eGFR ≥30 mL/min per 1.73 m², UPCR ≥113 mg/mmol, receiving standard therapy with mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids.

Submission history

7 entries
DecidedOutcomeComparatorICEREvidence
Mar 2026 Recommended · restricted standard therapy (glucocorticoids and mycophenolate mofetil) $35k–45k RCT · CRR
Jul 2018 Recommended · restricted ofatumumab, rituximab — Cost-minimisation
Mar 2018 Recommended · restricted — — RCT
Nov 2017 Not recommended rituximab in combination with chemotherapy for induction treatment and rituximab monotherapy for maintenance treatment — RCT · PFS
Nov 2016 Not recommended bendamustine monotherapy (as proxy for best supportive care) — RCT · PFS
Mar 2015 Recommended · restricted rituximab plus chlorambucil, chlorambucil monotherapy — RCT · PFS
Jul 2014 Not recommended chlorambucil monotherapy (primary); rituximab plus chlorambucil (secondary) $15k–45k RCT · PFS

Clinical evidence

Trials cited in the PSDs · ClinicalTrials.gov
TrialPhaseNPrimary outcomeStatus
CLL11 Ph 3 787 Progression-free Survival (PFS) completed

Consumer voice

Mar 2018

One individual and one organisation (Lymphoma Australia) provided input describing the fear of relapse as a significant mental and physiological challenge, and emphasising the importance of having a range of therapeutic options given that patients often experience multiple relapses.

The comments described the fear of relapse as a significant mental and physiological challenge. Consumer comments · PSD
fear of relapsemental health impactphysiological burdenunmet needtreatment optionsaccess to variety of therapies

Similar precedents

By decision profile

Regulatory · TGA

Label narrower than PBS population — PBAC restricts to patients with comorbidities/unfitness for fludarabine therapy and specific lab parameters; TGA label has no such restrictions.