← The record

NivolumabOpdivo

Recommended Oncology 💬 consumer voice

Treatment of multiple advanced or metastatic cancers including melanoma, NSCLC, RCC, urothelial carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity/pharynx/larynx, gastro-oesophageal cancers, and adjuvant treatment of oesophageal cancer, administered as subcutaneous injection in place of intravenous formulation.

37
Submissions
27 resub
2015–26
On the record
$25k–105k
ICER range
7 sourced ICERs · 2016–2024
Cost-min
Cost basis

Decisions on record

42 decisions
  • Meeting Mar 2026 Recommended Malignant melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), renal cell carcinoma (RCC), squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN), urothelial carcinoma (UC), oesophageal/gastro-oesophageal cancers
  • Meeting Dec 2024 Not recommended Perioperative treatment of resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
  • Meeting Nov 2024 Deferred Non-small cell lung cancer (perioperative treatment)
  • Meeting Nov 2024 Recommended Urothelial carcinoma
  • Meeting Mar 2024 Not recommended Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) - neoadjuvant treatment
  • Meeting Mar 2024 Recommended Muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIUC) - adjuvant treatment
  • Meeting Nov 2023 Deferred Adjuvant treatment of high-risk muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma
  • Meeting Jul 2023 Recommended Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
34 earlier decisions
  • Jul 2023 Recommended Gastro-oesophageal cancers
  • Mar 2023 Recommended Gastro-oesophageal cancers; advanced or metastatic gastro-oesophageal cancers
  • Mar 2023 Not recommended Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); neoadjuvant treatment of resectable NSCLC
  • Nov 2022 Recommended Oesophageal carcinoma or gastroesophageal junction carcinoma adjuvant treatment
  • Jul 2022 Not recommended Muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma following radical resection at high risk of recurrence
  • Jul 2022 Not recommended Oesophageal or gastroesophageal junction carcinoma after platinum-based chemoradiotherapy and surgery
  • Mar 2022 Recommended Second-line squamous cell oesophageal carcinoma
  • Mar 2022 Recommended Non-HER-2-positive gastric cancer, gastroesophageal junction cancer or oesophageal adenocarcinoma
  • Nov 2021 Not recommended Gastric cancer; Gastroesophageal junction cancer; Oesophageal adenocarcinoma
  • Jul 2021 Recommended Second-line squamous cell oesophageal carcinoma
  • Mar 2021 Not recommended Non-small cell lung cancer, second-line therapy
  • Jul 2020 Not recommended Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) no PSD
  • Nov 2019 Recommended Melanoma
  • Jul 2019 Deferred Melanoma
  • Mar 2019 Recommended Melanoma Non-small cell lung cancer Renal cell carcinoma Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck
  • Mar 2019 Not recommended NIVOLUMAB, as monotherapy, is indicated for:  Adjuvant treatment of patients with melanoma with involvement of lymph nodes or metastatic disease who have undergone complete resection.
  • Nov 2018 Recommended Renal cell carcinoma (RCC)
  • Jul 2018 Recommended Malignant melanoma
  • Jul 2018 Not recommended Malignant melanoma
  • Jul 2018 Not recommended Renal cell carcinoma (RCC)
  • Mar 2018 Recommended Squamous cell carcinoma for the head and neck (SCCHN)
  • Nov 2017 Not recommended Squamous cell carcinoma for the head and neck (SCCHN)
  • Mar 2017 Recommended Renal cell carcinoma (RCC)
  • Mar 2017 Recommended Non-small cell lung cancer
  • Mar 2017 Not recommended Nivolumab, in combination with ipilimumab, is indicated for the treatment of patients with metastatic (Stage IV) melanoma with M1c disease or elevated lactic
  • Nov 2016 Not recommended Nivolumab is indicated for the treatment of patients with unresectable (Stage III) or metastatic (Stage IV) melanoma and locally advanced or metastatic squamous or non-squamous non- small cell lung cancer with progression on or after prior chemotherapy. Nivolumab in combination with ipilumimab is in
  • Nov 2016 Deferred Squamous non- small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
  • Nov 2016 Deferred Non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
  • Jul 2016 Not recommended Metastatic renal cell carcinoma
  • Mar 2016 Not recommended Squamous non-small cell lung cancer
  • Mar 2016 Not recommended Non-squamous non- small cell lung cancer
  • Nov 2015 Recommended Melanoma
  • Nov 2015 Not recommended Melanoma
  • Jul 2015 Not recommended Melanoma

Access path

37 submissions · public record
  1. TGA registered · Opdivo

    TGA label narrower than the PBS population

  2. Jul 2015
    Not recommended

    vs ipilimumab

  3. ↻ resubmitted
    Nov 2015
    Recommended

    Comparator changed: ipilimumab → pembrolizumab

  4. Mar 2016
    Not recommended

    Comparator changed: pembrolizumab → docetaxel

  5. ↻ resubmitted
    Mar 2016
    Recommended · restricted

    Comparator changed: pembrolizumab → docetaxel

  6. Jul 2016
    Not recommended

    Comparator changed: docetaxel → everolimus

  7. Nov 2016
    Deferred

    Comparator changed: everolimus → docetaxel (main); pemetrexed (comparator)

  8. Nov 2016
    Not recommended

    Comparator changed: everolimus → docetaxel (main); pemetrexed (comparator)

  9. Nov 2016
    Deferred

    Comparator changed: everolimus → docetaxel (main); pemetrexed (comparator)

  10. Mar 2017
    Recommended · restricted

    Listing: Authority Required → Restricted

  11. Mar 2017
    Recommended · restricted

    Listing: Authority Required → Restricted

  12. Nov 2017
    Recommended · restricted

    Comparator changed: everolimus → standard of care (paclitaxel, docetaxel, methotrexate…

  13. Mar 2018
    Recommended · restricted

    Comparator changed: standard of care (paclitaxel, docetaxel, methotrexate, capecitabine)…

  14. Jul 2018
    Recommended · restricted

    Comparator changed: Standard of care (paclitaxel, docetaxel, methotrexate, or…

  15. Nov 2018
    Recommended · restricted

    Comparator changed: Observation (watch and wait) → sunitinib

  16. Mar 2019
    Not recommended

    Comparator changed: sunitinib → observation/watch and wait

  17. ↻ resubmitted
    Mar 2019
    Recommended

    Comparator changed: sunitinib → observation/watch and wait

  18. Jul 2019
    Deferred

    Comparator changed: weight-based 3 mg/kg Q2W dosing → ipilimumab (via indirect comparison…

  19. Nov 2019
    Recommended

    Comparator changed: ipilimumab (via indirect comparison using CA029 placebo arm for…

  20. Nov 2019
    Recommended · restricted

    Comparator changed: ipilimumab (via indirect comparison using CA029 placebo arm for…

  21. Mar 2021
    Not recommended

    Comparator changed: dabrafenib + trametinib (for BRAF mutant population)…

  22. ↻ resubmitted
    Jul 2021
    Recommended · restricted

    Comparator changed: docetaxel → single agent chemotherapy (docetaxel or paclitaxel)

  23. Nov 2021
    Not recommended

    Comparator changed: single agent chemotherapy (docetaxel or paclitaxel) →…

  24. ↻ resubmitted
    Mar 2022
    Recommended · restricted

    Comparator changed: platinum-containing plus fluoropyrimidine-containing chemotherapy…

  25. Mar 2022
    Recommended

    Comparator changed: platinum-containing plus fluoropyrimidine-containing chemotherapy…

  26. Jul 2022
    Not recommended

    Comparator changed: investigator's choice of chemotherapy (paclitaxel, docetaxel or…

  27. Jul 2022
    Not recommended

    Comparator changed: investigator's choice of chemotherapy (paclitaxel, docetaxel or…

  28. ↻ resubmitted
    Nov 2022
    Recommended · restricted

    Comparator changed: standard of care (watch and wait surveillance) → watch and wait…

  29. Mar 2023
    Not recommended

    Comparator changed: watch and wait surveillance → neoadjuvant chemotherapy

  30. ↻ resubmitted
    Mar 2023
    Recommended

    Comparator changed: watch and wait surveillance → neoadjuvant chemotherapy

  31. Jul 2023
    Recommended · restricted

    Comparator changed: fluoropyrimidine and platinum-based chemotherapy (for 1L OSCC); best…

  32. Jul 2023
    Recommended

    Comparator changed: fluoropyrimidine and platinum-based chemotherapy (for 1L OSCC); best…

  33. Nov 2023
    Deferred

    Comparator changed: neoadjuvant chemotherapy → watchful waiting

  34. Mar 2024
    Deferred

    Comparator changed: watchful waiting → platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy

  35. Mar 2024
    Recommended · restricted

    Comparator changed: watchful waiting → platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy

  36. Nov 2024
    Recommended · restricted

    Comparator changed: watchful waiting → gemcitabine-cisplatin chemotherapy (SoC)…

  37. Dec 2024
    Not recommended

    Comparator changed: gemcitabine-cisplatin chemotherapy (SoC); supplementary comparator:…

  38. Mar 2026
    Not recommended

    Comparator changed: Neoadjuvant nivolumab plus platinum-doublet chemotherapy (main…

RecommendedDeferredNot recommended

From the public summary

Verbatim · PSD text · may span indications
PBAC outcome
7.1 The PBAC did not recommend the listing of nivolumab for the perioperative treatment of patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The PBAC noted the perioperative use of nivolumab consisted of up to 4 doses prior to surgery in combination with chemotherapy (neoadjuvant treatment) and up to 12 months of treatment post-surgery as monotherapy (adjuvant treatment).PSD · Dec 2024
7.2 The primary reason for this outcome was due to the comparative clinical evidence.PSD · Dec 2024
Economic analysis
6.60 The PSCR acknowledged that due to its recent PBS listing, neoNIVO was the most appropriate main comparator, for which a clinical claim of at least noninferiority, and potentially superior efficacy, for periNIVO versus neoNIVO was made by the submission.PSD · Dec 2024
6.61 The CMA presented in the PSCR was based on equivalent total costs for neoNIVO and periNIVO over the total duration of therapy for each treatment regimen. The total cost of therapy included drug costs for nivolumab and chemotherapy, and administration costs. 6.62 The proposed equi-effective doses are:PSD · Dec 2024
Clinical claim
6.53 The submission claimed that periNIVO offers ‘at least noninferior, and potentially superior efficacy’ and noninferior safety compared with neoNIVO.PSD · Dec 2024
6.54 The ESC considered that the clinical claim of ‘at least noninferior, and potentially superior’ efficacy of periNIVO compared to neoNIVO was uncertain and likely not supported. The ESC noted the results from the ITC of periNIVO versus neoNIVO presented in the submission (HR=0.92; 95% CI: 0.59, 1.44) was associated with wide confidence intervals, indicating a high level of uncertainty around the estimated effect size.PSD · Dec 2024
Consumer comments
6.2 The PBAC noted and welcomed the input from an individual and organisations (3) via the Consumer Comments facility on the PBS website. An individual accessing nivolumab through a clinical trial stated that there were limited treatment options for their type of lung cancer and expressed concern of exhausting treatment options.PSD · Dec 2024
6.3 The PBAC acknowledged the input from Rare Cancers Australia and Lung Foundation Australia expressing their support for the listing of nivolumab for the perioperative treatment of resectable NSCLC. The organisations emphasised the importance of additional treatment options for this patient group and considered that nivolumab as perioperative treatment could result in considerable benefits for NSCLC patients and their carers and families.PSD · Dec 2024

Cost-effectiveness

7 sourced ICERs · 2016–2024

Cost-minimisation analysis; no ICER calculated by design as this is a formulation comparison (subcutaneous vs intravenous) of the same active agent with anticipated comparable pharmacokinetics and clinical outcomes.

The pre-PBAC response stated that the sponsor agreed in principle to a subsequent price reduction to reduce the ICER to under $55,000 to < $75,000 per QALY gained as outlined in paragraph 6.69. PSD · 2024
ICER uncertain ×10ICER / price too high ×3Economic model disputed ×10Price cut / RSA needed ×5Immature survival data ×2Surrogate endpointCost-effectiveness accepted ×2

Decision context

PopulationPatients with advanced or metastatic cancer (melanoma, NSCLC, RCC, urothelial carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma of oral cavity/pharynx/larynx, gastro-oesophageal cancers) or adjuvant-treated oesophageal cancer, receiving flat-dose nivolumab 600 mg every 2 weeks or 1200 mg every 4 weeks as monotherapy or in combination with certain therapies (excluding ipilimumab).

Submission history

37 entries
DecidedOutcomeComparatorICEREvidence
Mar 2026 Not recommended nivolumab 100 mg/10 mL injection, intravenous form (NIVO IV) RCT
Dec 2024 Not recommended Neoadjuvant nivolumab plus platinum-doublet chemotherapy (main comparator per PSCR) RCT · EFS
Nov 2024 Recommended · restricted gemcitabine-cisplatin chemotherapy (SoC); supplementary comparator: avelumab maintenance therapy RCT · OS
Mar 2024 Deferred platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy $25k–35k RCT · EFS
Mar 2024 Recommended · restricted watchful waiting RCT · DFS
Nov 2023 Deferred watchful waiting RCT · DFS
Jul 2023 Recommended · restricted chemotherapy Other
Jul 2023 Recommended neoadjuvant chemotherapy $25k–35k RCT · PFS
Mar 2023 Not recommended neoadjuvant chemotherapy RCT · EFS
Mar 2023 Recommended fluoropyrimidine and platinum-based chemotherapy (for 1L OSCC); best supportive care (for 2L OSCC) RCT · OS
Nov 2022 Recommended · restricted watch and wait surveillance RCT · DFS
Jul 2022 Not recommended watchful waiting RCT · DFS
Jul 2022 Not recommended standard of care (watch and wait surveillance) RCT · DFS
Mar 2022 Recommended · restricted Platinum-containing plus fluoropyrimidine-containing chemotherapy (FOLFOX or XELOX) RCT · OS
Mar 2022 Recommended investigator's choice of chemotherapy (paclitaxel, docetaxel or irinotecan) $55k–95k RCT · OS
Nov 2021 Not recommended platinum-containing plus fluoropyrimidine-containing chemotherapy alone (XELOX or FOLFOX) RCT · PFS
Jul 2021 Recommended · restricted single agent chemotherapy (docetaxel or paclitaxel) RCT · OS
Mar 2021 Not recommended docetaxel RCT · OS
Nov 2019 Recommended dabrafenib + trametinib (DAB+TRAM) Indirect comparison / Meta-analysis · OS
Nov 2019 Recommended · restricted dabrafenib + trametinib (for BRAF mutant population); cost-effectiveness basis for BRAF wild-type population RCT · Other
Jul 2019 Deferred ipilimumab (via indirect comparison using CA029 placebo arm for observation) RCT · RFS
Mar 2019 Not recommended observation/watch and wait RCT · RFS
Mar 2019 Recommended weight-based 3 mg/kg Q2W dosing Cost-minimisation · Cost-minimisation
Nov 2018 Recommended · restricted sunitinib RCT · Other
Jul 2018 Recommended · restricted Observation (watch and wait) RCT · RFS
Mar 2018 Recommended · restricted Standard of care (paclitaxel, docetaxel, methotrexate, or capecitabine) $45k–105k RCT · OS
Nov 2017 Recommended · restricted standard of care (paclitaxel, docetaxel, methotrexate, capecitabine) RCT · OS
Mar 2017 Recommended · restricted docetaxel $45k–105k RCT · OS
Mar 2017 Recommended · restricted everolimus $45k–75k RCT · OS
Nov 2016 Deferred docetaxel (main); pemetrexed (comparator) RCT · OS
Nov 2016 Not recommended everolimus $45k–75k RCT · OS
Nov 2016 Deferred docetaxel RCT · OS
Jul 2016 Not recommended everolimus RCT · OS
Mar 2016 Not recommended docetaxel RCT · OS
Mar 2016 Recommended · restricted docetaxel RCT · OS
Nov 2015 Recommended pembrolizumab Single-arm · OS
Jul 2015 Not recommended ipilimumab RCT · OS

Clinical evidence

Trials cited in the PSDs · ClinicalTrials.gov
TrialPhaseNPrimary outcomeStatus
CheckMate 816 (CM816) Ph 3 505 Event-Free Survival (EFS) completed
Checkmate 577 Ph 3 794 Disease-free Survival (DFS) completed
Checkmate 648 Ph 3 970 Overall Survival (OS) in Participants With Tumor Cell PD-L1 completed

Consumer voice

Dec 2024

An individual with lung cancer accessing nivolumab through a clinical trial reported limited treatment options, profound impacts on mental health and quality of life, and hospitalisations due to side effects, while raising affordability concerns. Two organisations (Rare Cancers Australia and Lung Foundation Australia) supported nivolumab listing, emphasising additional treatment options, manageabl

The individual noted that the condition has had a profound impact on their and their family member's mental health and quality of life. Consumer comments · PSD
unmet needquality of lifeside effectstreatment burdenout-of-pocket costmental health impact

Similar precedents

By decision profile

Regulatory · TGA

Label narrower than PBS population — PBAC restricts to WHO performance status 0 or 1, which is not specified in the TGA label.