← The record

VinorelbineNavelbine IV

Recommended OncologyAuthority Required (STREAMLINED)Later-line line

For the treatment of advanced breast cancer after failure of standard prior therapy, as a single agent or in combination. Also for locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

1
Submissions
1 resub
2012–12
On the record
ICER range
Cost-min
Cost basis

Decisions on record

2 decisions
  • Meeting Nov 2014 Recommended The Medical Oncology Group of Australia on behalf of various sponsors Change to listing (Correspondence) Cancer The Medical Oncology Group of Australia sought to have the drugs capecitabine, megestrol, toremifene and vinorelbine (injection presentation only) made available as unrestricted pharmaceut
  • Meeting Nov 2012 Not recommended Breast cancer

Access path

1 submission · public record
  1. TGA registered · Navelbine IV

    TGA label narrower than the PBS population

  2. Nov 2012
    Not recommended

    inadequate evidence to support claim of equivalence in comparative effectiveness and safety between oral and IV…

RecommendedDeferredNot recommended

Cost-effectiveness

Cost-minimisation analysis presented but not accepted by PBAC due to rejection of efficacy claim and concerns about pricing methodology

The PBAC considered that the data presented from CA-221 and CA-222 did not adequately support the claim of equivalence in terms of comparative effectiveness and comparative safety of oral and IV vinorelbine. PBAC · 2012
Economic model disputed

Decision context

Populationpatients with advanced breast cancer after failure of standard prior therapy, as a single agent or in combination. Also for locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

Why it was knocked back

  • inadequate evidence to support claim of equivalence in comparative effectiveness and safety between oral and IV vinorelbine, inappropriate cost-minimisation analysis, results of CA-221 showed oral vinorelbine associated with lower response rates and shorter PFS/OS than IV vinorelbine, limited data for trastuzumab combination, no clinical evidence for removal of anthracycline requirement, uncertainty in patient number estimates, dosing assumptions not supported by clinical guidelines

Submission history

1 entries
DecidedOutcomeComparatorICEREvidence
Nov 2012 Not recommended intravenous (IV) vinorelbine RCT | Single-arm · OS | PFS

Similar precedents

By decision profile

Regulatory · TGA

Label narrower than PBS population — PBAC restricts to later-line treatment; TGA label permits single agent or combination without line-of-therapy specification.