EverolimusAfinitor
Adjunctive treatment of refractory seizures associated with tuberous sclerosis complex in patients aged 2 years and older.
Decisions on record
- Meeting Jul 2018 Recommended Tuberous sclerosis complex no PSD
- Meeting Dec 2017 Deferred Tuberous sclerosis complex
- Meeting Nov 2015 Not recommended Prophylaxis of organ rejection
- Meeting Nov 2014 Recommended Indication not stated
- Meeting Mar 2014 Recommended Afinitor® Novartis Pharmaceuticals Australia Pty Ltd Malignant pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour (pNET) To request a General Schedule Authority Required listing for the treatment of metastatic or unresectable, well-differentiated malignant pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour (pNET). Overall, the PBAC co
- Meeting Mar 2014 Recommended Afinitor® Novartis Pharmaceuticals Australia Pty Ltd Clear cell variant renal cell carcinoma To request a General Schedule Authority Required listing for the treatment of Stage IV clear cell variant renal cell carcinoma after progression on sunitinib. With no new clinical safety data presented in th
- Meeting Jul 2013 Recommended Hormone-receptor positive, HER2 negative advanced breast cancer
- Meeting Apr 2013 Recommended Tuberous sclerosis
7 earlier decisions
- Nov 2012 Not recommended Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour
- Nov 2012 Deferred Subependymal giant cell astrocytoma (SEGA)
- Nov 2011 Not recommended Treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma after failure of treatment with sorafenib or sunitinib.
- Nov 2010 Not recommended Treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma after failure of treatment with sorafenib or sunitinib. no PSD
- Jul 2010 Not recommended Treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma after failure of treatment with sorafenib or sunitinib.
- Nov 2009 Recommended Transplant-rejection drug
- Nov 2009 Not recommended Anti-cancer drug
Access path
- TGA registered · Afinitor
TGA label narrower than the PBS population
- Nov 2009Not recommended
uncertain clinical benefit (no overall survival benefit demonstrated), high and uncertain cost-effectiveness ratio…
- Jul 2010Not recommended
uncertain clinical benefit (PFS benefit of 3 months not established as clinically important; no statistically…
- Jul 2010Not recommended
uncertain clinical benefit due to PFS benefit without OS or quality of life benefit, high and uncertain…
- Nov 2011Not recommended
high and uncertain cost-effectiveness ratio, uncertain survival gain and magnitude of gain, undemonstrated clinical…
- Nov 2011Not recommended
high and uncertain cost-effectiveness ratio, uncertain survival benefit, small PFS benefit of only three months, no…
- 2012Not recommended
Uncertainty about extrapolation of tumour volume reduction to clinical outcomes (seizure frequency, developmental…
- Nov 2012Not recommended
Uncertain comparative effectiveness (non-inferiority claim not persuasive based on indirect comparison with wide…
- Nov 2012Not recommended
uncertain clinical superiority to best supportive care, cost-minimisation analysis not appropriate given…
- Nov 2012Not recommended
Uncertainty about extrapolation of reduction in tumour volume to clinical outcomes, no survival advantage evident, lack…
- Mar 2013Not recommended
immature overall survival data, high and uncertain ICER, uncertain clinical benefit in terms of overall survival…
- ↻ resubmittedApr 2013Recommended · restricted
ICER dropped $75,000 → $45,000 (-40%)
- Jul 2013Recommended
ICER rose $45,000 → $75,000 (+67%)
- Mar 2014Recommended · restricted
Comparator changed: exemestane → sunitinib
- Mar 2014Recommended · restricted
Comparator changed: exemestane → sunitinib
- Nov 2015Not recommended
Decision deferred pending completion of Post-Market Review of PBS Authorities; PBAC declined to recommend changes until…
- ↻ resubmittedDec 2017Recommended
Evidence: Cost-minimisation → RCT
- PBS listing · Authority Required
From the public summary
7.1 The PBAC deferred its decision about whether to extend the listing of everolimus to include the treatment of refractory seizures associated with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), to allow for negotiations to establish the appropriate restriction, and a price for treatment that could be considered cost-effective.PSD · Dec 2017
7.2 The PBAC agreed with the ESC that it might be appropriate to consider a whole-of- disease approach to PBS subsidy of everolimus for TSC, given the ability to block the disease pathway, rather than individual consideration of disease presentations as more evidence becomes available, noting that the evidence presented in the submission was solely focused on the management of refractory epilepsy.PSD · Dec 2017
6.22 The submission presented a modelled economic evaluation comparing EVR with best supportive care for refractory seizures associated with TSC. The costs and outcomes calculated for EVR in the model reflected the medication and administration costs and outcomes in HT EVR arm of EXIST-3.PSD · Dec 2017
Table 8: Summary of model structure and rationale Component Summary Time horizon 5 years in the model base case versus 18 weeks in trial Outcomes QALYs Methods used to generate results Cohort expected value analysis A simple Markov model with four health states based on reduction in seizure frequency from baseline: “Seizure free (100%)”, “Responder (≥50% to <100%)”, “Partial responder (≥25% to <50%)” and “Discontinued (<25%)”; death was not modelled.PSD · Dec 2017
6.10 The re-submission described everolimus as non-inferior to sunitinib in terms of clinical effectiveness for the treatment of patients with advanced pNET, with a different, but manageable, safety profile. 6.11 The PBAC accepted the re-submission’s clinical claim.PSD · Mar 2014
6.7 The re-submission did not alter its November 2011 claim that everolimus has superior efficacy and inferior safety in mRCC compared with placebo.PSD · Mar 2014
6.2 The PBAC noted and welcomed the input from individuals (2), and organisations (1) via the Consumer Comments facility on the PBS website. The comments described a range of benefits of treatment with everolimus including reduced seizure frequency and severity, improved quality of life for patients and their families, and reduced carer burden.PSD · Dec 2017
6.34 The submission proposed a special pricing arrangement for the proposed listing that included an effective price cheaper than the current PBS listing for TSC (i.e., SEGAs, visceral tumours) on a cost/mg basis. It was anticipated that there would also need to be a Deed of Agreement for the proposed indication of refractory seizures associated with TSC and the Sponsor is willing to discuss the content with the PBAC.PSD · Dec 2017
Cost-effectiveness
The actual ICER values are not stated in the public text; effective prices are redacted (shown as '''''''''''''').
The minor submission estimated there to be no financial implications to the PBS as the majority of the eligible patients would continue to receive everolimus Certican® in the general category. PSD · 2015
Decision context
PopulationPatients aged 2 years and older with refractory epilepsy associated with tuberous sclerosis complex, defined as a minimum of two partial-onset seizures per week, with failure to control with at least two anti-epileptic drugs, receiving at least one concomitant anti-epileptic drug, and not candidates for curative surgery.
Submission history
| Decided | Outcome | Comparator | ICER | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2017 | Recommended | best supportive care (placebo) | — | RCT · ≥50% reduction seizure frequency |
| Nov 2015 | Not recommended | — | — | Cost-minimisation · Cost-minimisation |
| Mar 2014 | Recommended · restricted | sunitinib | — | RCT · PFS |
| Mar 2014 | Recommended · restricted | best supportive care | $45k–105k | RCT · PFS |
| Jul 2013 | Recommended | exemestane | $45k–75k | RCT · OS |
| Apr 2013 | Recommended · restricted | best supportive care | $15k–45k | RCT · SEGA response rate |
| Mar 2013 | Not recommended | aromatase inhibitor (letrozole, anastrozole, or exemestane) | $45k–75k | RCT · PFS |
| Nov 2012 | Not recommended | best supportive care | — | RCT · PFS |
| Nov 2012 | Not recommended | best supportive care (including symptomatic treatment with somatostatin analogues) | — | RCT · PFS |
| Nov 2012 | Not recommended | best supportive care | $15k–45k | RCT |
| 2012 | Not recommended | best supportive care | $15k–45k | RCT · SEGA response rate |
| Nov 2011 | Not recommended | best supportive care | $45k–75k | RCT · PFS |
| Nov 2011 | Not recommended | best supportive care | $45k–75k | RCT · PFS |
| Jul 2010 | Not recommended | placebo for best supportive care | $45k–75k | RCT · PFS |
| Jul 2010 | Not recommended | placebo for best supportive care | $45k–105k | RCT · PFS |
| Nov 2009 | Not recommended | placebo / best supportive care | $45k–200k | RCT · PFS |
Clinical evidence
| Trial | Phase | N | Primary outcome | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RADIANT-3 | Ph 3 | 410 | Time to Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based as Per Investigator Using Kaplan-Meier Metho… | completed |
| BOLERO-2 | Ph 3 | 724 | Progression-free Survival (PFS) Based on Local Radiology Review of Tumor Assessments. | completed |
| EXIST-3 | Ph 3 | 366 | Core Phase: European Medicine Agency (EMA): Seizure Frequency Response Rate | completed |
| RECORD-1 | Ph 3 | 416 | Progressive Free Survival (PFS) in Patients Who Receive RAD001 Plus Best Supportive Care(B… | completed |
Consumer voice
Consumer input from 2 individuals and 1 organisation described benefits of everolimus treatment including reduced seizure frequency and severity, improved quality of life for patients and families, and reduced carer burden.
The comments described a range of benefits of treatment with everolimus including reduced seizure frequency and severity, improved quality of life for patients and their families, and reduced carer burden. Consumer comments · PSD
Similar precedents
Regulatory · TGA
Label narrower than PBS population — PBAC restricts to patients who failed ≥2 prior antiepileptic drugs, are ineligible for surgery, and have ≥2 seizures weekly.