← The record

EverolimusAfinitor

Recommended NeurologyAuthority RequiredLater-line line 💬 consumer voice

Adjunctive treatment of refractory seizures associated with tuberous sclerosis complex in patients aged 2 years and older.

16
Submissions
8 resub
2009–17
On the record
$15k–200k
ICER range
11 sourced ICERs · 2009–2014
Redacted
Cost basis

Decisions on record

15 decisions
  • Meeting Jul 2018 Recommended Tuberous sclerosis complex no PSD
  • Meeting Dec 2017 Deferred Tuberous sclerosis complex
  • Meeting Nov 2015 Not recommended Prophylaxis of organ rejection
  • Meeting Nov 2014 Recommended Indication not stated
  • Meeting Mar 2014 Recommended Afinitor® Novartis Pharmaceuticals Australia Pty Ltd Malignant pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour (pNET) To request a General Schedule Authority Required listing for the treatment of metastatic or unresectable, well-differentiated malignant pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour (pNET). Overall, the PBAC co
  • Meeting Mar 2014 Recommended Afinitor® Novartis Pharmaceuticals Australia Pty Ltd Clear cell variant renal cell carcinoma To request a General Schedule Authority Required listing for the treatment of Stage IV clear cell variant renal cell carcinoma after progression on sunitinib. With no new clinical safety data presented in th
  • Meeting Jul 2013 Recommended Hormone-receptor positive, HER2 negative advanced breast cancer
  • Meeting Apr 2013 Recommended Tuberous sclerosis
7 earlier decisions
  • Nov 2012 Not recommended Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour
  • Nov 2012 Deferred Subependymal giant cell astrocytoma (SEGA)
  • Nov 2011 Not recommended Treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma after failure of treatment with sorafenib or sunitinib.
  • Nov 2010 Not recommended Treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma after failure of treatment with sorafenib or sunitinib. no PSD
  • Jul 2010 Not recommended Treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma after failure of treatment with sorafenib or sunitinib.
  • Nov 2009 Recommended Transplant-rejection drug
  • Nov 2009 Not recommended Anti-cancer drug

Access path

16 submissions · public record
  1. TGA registered · Afinitor

    TGA label narrower than the PBS population

  2. Nov 2009
    Not recommended

    uncertain clinical benefit (no overall survival benefit demonstrated), high and uncertain cost-effectiveness ratio…

  3. Jul 2010
    Not recommended

    uncertain clinical benefit (PFS benefit of 3 months not established as clinically important; no statistically…

  4. Jul 2010
    Not recommended

    uncertain clinical benefit due to PFS benefit without OS or quality of life benefit, high and uncertain…

  5. Nov 2011
    Not recommended

    high and uncertain cost-effectiveness ratio, uncertain survival gain and magnitude of gain, undemonstrated clinical…

  6. Nov 2011
    Not recommended

    high and uncertain cost-effectiveness ratio, uncertain survival benefit, small PFS benefit of only three months, no…

  7. 2012
    Not recommended

    Uncertainty about extrapolation of tumour volume reduction to clinical outcomes (seizure frequency, developmental…

  8. Nov 2012
    Not recommended

    Uncertain comparative effectiveness (non-inferiority claim not persuasive based on indirect comparison with wide…

  9. Nov 2012
    Not recommended

    uncertain clinical superiority to best supportive care, cost-minimisation analysis not appropriate given…

  10. Nov 2012
    Not recommended

    Uncertainty about extrapolation of reduction in tumour volume to clinical outcomes, no survival advantage evident, lack…

  11. Mar 2013
    Not recommended

    immature overall survival data, high and uncertain ICER, uncertain clinical benefit in terms of overall survival…

  12. ↻ resubmitted
    Apr 2013
    Recommended · restricted

    ICER dropped $75,000 → $45,000 (-40%)

  13. Jul 2013
    Recommended

    ICER rose $45,000 → $75,000 (+67%)

  14. Mar 2014
    Recommended · restricted

    Comparator changed: exemestane → sunitinib

  15. Mar 2014
    Recommended · restricted

    Comparator changed: exemestane → sunitinib

  16. Nov 2015
    Not recommended

    Decision deferred pending completion of Post-Market Review of PBS Authorities; PBAC declined to recommend changes until…

  17. ↻ resubmitted
    Dec 2017
    Recommended

    Evidence: Cost-minimisation → RCT

  18. PBS listing · Authority Required
RecommendedDeferredNot recommended

From the public summary

Verbatim · PSD text · may span indications
PBAC outcome
7.1 The PBAC deferred its decision about whether to extend the listing of everolimus to include the treatment of refractory seizures associated with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), to allow for negotiations to establish the appropriate restriction, and a price for treatment that could be considered cost-effective.PSD · Dec 2017
7.2 The PBAC agreed with the ESC that it might be appropriate to consider a whole-of- disease approach to PBS subsidy of everolimus for TSC, given the ability to block the disease pathway, rather than individual consideration of disease presentations as more evidence becomes available, noting that the evidence presented in the submission was solely focused on the management of refractory epilepsy.PSD · Dec 2017
Economic analysis
6.22 The submission presented a modelled economic evaluation comparing EVR with best supportive care for refractory seizures associated with TSC. The costs and outcomes calculated for EVR in the model reflected the medication and administration costs and outcomes in HT EVR arm of EXIST-3.PSD · Dec 2017
Table 8: Summary of model structure and rationale Component Summary Time horizon 5 years in the model base case versus 18 weeks in trial Outcomes QALYs Methods used to generate results Cohort expected value analysis A simple Markov model with four health states based on reduction in seizure frequency from baseline: “Seizure free (100%)”, “Responder (≥50% to <100%)”, “Partial responder (≥25% to <50%)” and “Discontinued (<25%)”; death was not modelled.PSD · Dec 2017
Clinical claim
6.10 The re-submission described everolimus as non-inferior to sunitinib in terms of clinical effectiveness for the treatment of patients with advanced pNET, with a different, but manageable, safety profile. 6.11 The PBAC accepted the re-submission’s clinical claim.PSD · Mar 2014
6.7 The re-submission did not alter its November 2011 claim that everolimus has superior efficacy and inferior safety in mRCC compared with placebo.PSD · Mar 2014
Consumer comments
6.2 The PBAC noted and welcomed the input from individuals (2), and organisations (1) via the Consumer Comments facility on the PBS website. The comments described a range of benefits of treatment with everolimus including reduced seizure frequency and severity, improved quality of life for patients and their families, and reduced carer burden.PSD · Dec 2017
Financial management – risk sharing
6.34 The submission proposed a special pricing arrangement for the proposed listing that included an effective price cheaper than the current PBS listing for TSC (i.e., SEGAs, visceral tumours) on a cost/mg basis. It was anticipated that there would also need to be a Deed of Agreement for the proposed indication of refractory seizures associated with TSC and the Sponsor is willing to discuss the content with the PBAC.PSD · Dec 2017

Cost-effectiveness

11 sourced ICERs · 2009–2014

The actual ICER values are not stated in the public text; effective prices are redacted (shown as '''''''''''''').

The minor submission estimated there to be no financial implications to the PBS as the majority of the eligible patients would continue to receive everolimus Certican® in the general category. PSD · 2015
ICER uncertain ×6ICER / price too highEconomic model disputed ×2Price cut / RSA neededImmature survival data ×2Surrogate endpoint ×3Cost-effectiveness accepted ×2

Decision context

PopulationPatients aged 2 years and older with refractory epilepsy associated with tuberous sclerosis complex, defined as a minimum of two partial-onset seizures per week, with failure to control with at least two anti-epileptic drugs, receiving at least one concomitant anti-epileptic drug, and not candidates for curative surgery.

Submission history

16 entries
DecidedOutcomeComparatorICEREvidence
Dec 2017 Recommended best supportive care (placebo) RCT · ≥50% reduction seizure frequency
Nov 2015 Not recommended Cost-minimisation · Cost-minimisation
Mar 2014 Recommended · restricted sunitinib RCT · PFS
Mar 2014 Recommended · restricted best supportive care $45k–105k RCT · PFS
Jul 2013 Recommended exemestane $45k–75k RCT · OS
Apr 2013 Recommended · restricted best supportive care $15k–45k RCT · SEGA response rate
Mar 2013 Not recommended aromatase inhibitor (letrozole, anastrozole, or exemestane) $45k–75k RCT · PFS
Nov 2012 Not recommended best supportive care RCT · PFS
Nov 2012 Not recommended best supportive care (including symptomatic treatment with somatostatin analogues) RCT · PFS
Nov 2012 Not recommended best supportive care $15k–45k RCT
2012 Not recommended best supportive care $15k–45k RCT · SEGA response rate
Nov 2011 Not recommended best supportive care $45k–75k RCT · PFS
Nov 2011 Not recommended best supportive care $45k–75k RCT · PFS
Jul 2010 Not recommended placebo for best supportive care $45k–75k RCT · PFS
Jul 2010 Not recommended placebo for best supportive care $45k–105k RCT · PFS
Nov 2009 Not recommended placebo / best supportive care $45k–200k RCT · PFS

Clinical evidence

Trials cited in the PSDs · ClinicalTrials.gov
TrialPhaseNPrimary outcomeStatus
RADIANT-3 Ph 3 410 Time to Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based as Per Investigator Using Kaplan-Meier Metho… completed
BOLERO-2 Ph 3 724 Progression-free Survival (PFS) Based on Local Radiology Review of Tumor Assessments. completed
EXIST-3 Ph 3 366 Core Phase: European Medicine Agency (EMA): Seizure Frequency Response Rate completed
RECORD-1 Ph 3 416 Progressive Free Survival (PFS) in Patients Who Receive RAD001 Plus Best Supportive Care(B… completed

Consumer voice

Dec 2017

Consumer input from 2 individuals and 1 organisation described benefits of everolimus treatment including reduced seizure frequency and severity, improved quality of life for patients and families, and reduced carer burden.

The comments described a range of benefits of treatment with everolimus including reduced seizure frequency and severity, improved quality of life for patients and their families, and reduced carer burden. Consumer comments · PSD
seizure reductionquality of lifetreatment benefitcarer burdenfamily impact

Similar precedents

By decision profile

Regulatory · TGA

Label narrower than PBS population — PBAC restricts to patients who failed ≥2 prior antiepileptic drugs, are ineligible for surgery, and have ≥2 seizures weekly.