← The record

FulvestrantFulvestrant Accord

Noted OncologyAuthority RequiredFirst-line and Second-line line 💬 consumer voice

First-line and second-line endocrine-based treatment of non-premenopausal patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer.

1
Submissions
2020–20
On the record
ICER range
Cost basis

Decisions on record

2 decisions
  • Meeting Nov 2022 Noted Breast cancer no PSD
  • Meeting Jul 2020 Recommended Breast cancer

Access path

1 submission · public record
  1. TGA registered · Fulvestrant Accord

    TGA label narrower than the PBS population

  2. Jul 2020
    Recommended

    vs anastrozole (first-line); everolimus + exemestane…

  3. PBS listing · Authority Required
RecommendedDeferredNot recommended

From the public summary

Verbatim · PSD text · may span indications
PBAC outcome
The PBAC recommended the listing of fulvestrant for the treatment of patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) unresectable advanced or metastatic breast cancer (ABC). The PBAC was satisfied that first line treatment with fulvestrant provides, for some patients, an improvement in efficacy over NSAIs. The PBAC also considered, on balance, fulvestrant 37PSD · Jul 2020
The PBAC recalled that it, along with the BCNA and MOGA Breast Cancer Expert Group, had requested that the sponsor provide a submission for fulvestrant. The PBAC considered that the main clinical need for fulvestrant monotherapy was:  In the first-line setting: older or frail patients who wish to avoid CDK4/6 inhibitors or who are intolerant to CDK4/6 inhibitors, or patients who progressed on NSAIs in the adjuvant setting, and  In the second-line and …PSD · Jul 2020
Economic analysis
The submission presented a cost-effectiveness model comparing fulvestrant to anastrozole as first-line treatment for HR+ HER2- ABC, based on the FALCON and FIRST trials. This is consistent with the clinical claim of superior efficacy and non-inferior 24PSD · Jul 2020
Table 13 summarises the key components of the economic evaluation for first-line therapy.PSD · Jul 2020
Clinical claim
In HR+, HER2- ABC, fulvestrant has superior efficacy in terms of OS and non-inferior safety compared with non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors. Second-line:PSD · Jul 2020
In HR+, HER2- ABC, fulvestrant is non-inferior in terms of OS and has superior safety compared with everolimus in combination with exemestane HR+, hormone receptor positive; HER2-, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative; ABC, advanced breast cancer; ORR, overall response rate; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression free survival Source: Table 1.1, p14 of the submission, p143 of submissionPSD · Jul 2020
Consumer comments
The PBAC noted the advice received from Breast Cancer Network Australia (BCNA) in support of PBS listing of fulvestrant. BCNA reported that while the combination use with CDK4/6 inhibitors is currently the main area of need, having fulvestrant available through the PBS as a monotherapy and for other combination therapies would also be a welcome outcome.PSD · Jul 2020
One consumer comment was also received from a medical oncologist, who noted that fulvestrant is used regularly overseas, and is associated with better quality of life than chemotherapy. Without PBS access to fulvestrant, patients may be treated with chemotherapy earlier in their treatment.PSD · Jul 2020

Cost-effectiveness

The submission presented a cost-effectiveness analysis for first-line treatment and a cost-minimisation analysis for second-line treatment. Specific ICER values are not stated in the PSD.

Decision context

PopulationNon-premenopausal patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) unresectable locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer.

Submission history

1 entries
DecidedOutcomeComparatorICEREvidence
Jul 2020 Recommended anastrozole (first-line); everolimus + exemestane (second-line) RCT · OS

Clinical evidence

Trials cited in the PSDs · ClinicalTrials.gov
TrialPhaseNPrimary outcomeStatus
FALCON Ph 3 462 Comparison of Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Patients Treated With Fulvestrant With Th… completed

Consumer voice

Jul 2020

Breast Cancer Network Australia supports PBS listing of fulvestrant for combination use with CDK4/6 inhibitors and as monotherapy, noting that line-agnostic listing would enable broader use. A medical oncologist commented that fulvestrant is used regularly overseas and is associated with better quality of life than chemotherapy.

BCNA reported that while the combination use with CDK4/6 inhibitors is currently the main area of need, having fulvestrant available through the PBS as a monotherapy and for other combination therapies would also be a welcome outcome. Consumer comments · PSD
quality of lifeunmet needaccess barrierstreatment options

Similar precedents

By decision profile

Regulatory · TGA

Label narrower than PBS population — PBAC restricts to HER2-negative and non-premenopausal patients; TGA label does not specify HER2 status or explicitly exclude premenopausal patients.