Trastuzumab DeruxtecanEnhertu
Treatment of adult patients with hormone receptor positive (HR-positive) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low or HER2-ultralow unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer who have received at least one prior line of endocrine therapy in the metastatic setting and are no longer suitable for further endocrine therapy.
Decisions on record
- Meeting Mar 2026 Not recommended Breast cancer, hormone receptor positive (HR-positive) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low or HER2-ultralow metastatic breast cancer
- Meeting Nov 2025 Not recommended Metastatic HER2-positive gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer following trastuzumab therapy no PSD
- Meeting May 2025 Deferred Metastatic HER2-positive gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer post-trastuzumab
- Meeting Mar 2024 Recommended HER2-low unresectable or metastatic breast cancer
- Meeting Nov 2023 Not recommended HER2-low unresectable locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer
- Meeting Jul 2023 Recommended Breast Cancer no PSD
- Meeting Mar 2023 Recommended Breast Cancer; HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer no PSD
- Meeting Dec 2022 Deferred HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer in patients who have progressed following prior HER2-directed therapy or relapsed during/within 6 months of adjuvant HER2-directed therapy no PSD
1 earlier decision
- Jul 2022 Not recommended Breast cancer, HER2 positive metastatic with progression on prior HER2-directed therapy
Access path
- TGA registered · Enhertu
TGA label narrower than the PBS population
- Jul 2022Recommended · restricted
vs trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1)
- Nov 2023Not recommended
Comparator changed: trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) → For HR positive/HER2 low: physician's…
- ↻ resubmittedMar 2024Recommended · restricted
ICER dropped $95,000 → $75,000 (-21%)
- Nov 2025Not recommended
ICER rose $75,000 → $135,000 (+80%)
- Mar 2026Not recommended
Comparator changed: Standard of care chemotherapy (paclitaxel, irinotecan, docetaxel, or…
From the public summary
6.1 The PBAC did not recommend trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) for the treatment of adult patients with hormone receptor positive (HR-positive) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low or HER2-ultralow unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer (mBC) who have received at least one prior line of endocrine therapy (ET) in the metastatic setting and are no longer suitable for further ET.PSD · Mar 2026
6.2 The PBAC considered that the primary reason for this outcome was the economic evaluation.PSD · Mar 2026
5.52 The submission presented a modelled economic evaluation based on the key DB-06 trial, which compared T-DXd with ICC for the treatment of patients with HR-positive, HER2-low or HER2-ultralow mBC who have received at least one prior line of ET in the metastatic setting and are no longer considered suitable for ET.PSD · Mar 2026
5.53 The key components of the economic evaluation are summarised Table 11.PSD · Mar 2026
5.45 The submission described T-DXd as superior in terms of effectiveness compared with chemotherapy and inferior but with a manageable safety profile compared with chemotherapy. The Sub-Committees noted that T-DXd demonstrated a modest increase in effectiveness in terms of PFS, unclear OS benefit, no clear QoL benefit, and a clear increase in associated harms, including life-threatening adverse events.PSD · Mar 2026
5.46 The Sub-Committees agreed with the evaluation that the therapeutic conclusion presented in the submission was partially supported by the evidence from the key DB- 06 trial.PSD · Mar 2026
6.2 The PBAC noted and welcomed the input from health care professionals (1) and organisations (3) via the Consumer Comments facility on the PBS website. The comments from Rare Cancers Australia and the Pancare foundation highlighted the poor prognosis for HER2+ G/GOJ adenocarcinoma and the benefits of increased choice of treatment for the population.PSD · May 2025
Consumer input also noted the potential for significant side effects from T-DXd, and the health professional described the importance of educating clinicians regarding monitoring and early intervention for pneumonitis.PSD · May 2025
Cost-effectiveness
ICER values are redacted (commercially sensitive content marked 'redacted content' in the document)
The pre-PBAC response proposed a vial price of $ which resulted in an ICER of $55,000 to < $75,000 per QALY gained. PSD · 2024
Decision context
PopulationAdult patients with HR-positive HER2-low (IHC 1+ or IHC 2+/ISH-negative) or HER2-ultralow (IHC 0 with membrane staining) unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer who have received at least one prior line of endocrine therapy in the metastatic setting and are no longer suitable for further endocrine therapy
Submission history
| Decided | Outcome | Comparator | ICER | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2026 | Not recommended | investigator's choice of chemotherapy (ICC) consisting of capecitabine, paclitaxel and nab-paclitaxel | — | RCT · PFS |
| Nov 2025 | Not recommended | Standard of care chemotherapy (paclitaxel, irinotecan, docetaxel, or FOLFIRI) | $115k–135k | RCT · OS |
| Mar 2024 | Recommended · restricted | Treatment of physician's choice (TPC) comprising capecitabine, gemcitabine, eribulin, nab-paclitaxel, or paclitaxel | $55k–75k | RCT · OS |
| Nov 2023 | Not recommended | For HR positive/HER2 low: physician's choice of chemotherapy (capecitabine, gemcitabine, eribulin, paclitaxel, nab-pacli | $75k–95k | RCT · OS |
| Jul 2022 | Recommended · restricted | trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) | — | RCT · PFS |
Codependent tests
| Service | Biomarker | MSAC outcome | Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| HER2 ISH testing for trastuzumab-deruxtecan eligibility in metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma | HER2 gene amplification | supported with conditions | 2025 |
Consumer voice
Health care professionals and organisations highlighted the poor prognosis of HER2+ G/GOJ adenocarcinoma and emphasised the benefits of T-DXd treatment, including improved response rates and overall survival compared to chemotherapy, along with potential for reduced financial burden and equitable access if PBS listed. Consumer input also noted potential for significant side effects and the importa
the poor prognosis for HER2+ G/GOJ adenocarcinoma and the benefits of increased choice of treatment for the population Consumer comments · PSD
Similar precedents
Regulatory · TGA
Label narrower than PBS population — PBAC restricts to second-line and WHO performance status ≤1; TGA label has no performance status restriction or line-of-therapy limitation.
Listed in law
PBS listings commencing 1 Nov 2023 were made by these 3 determinations under the National Health Act 1953. A determination covers every listing that commenced that day, so this is the legal instrument in force for the date — not a document naming this medicine. Open it and check.
| Determination | Made | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB 105 of 2023 | 30 Oct 2023 | Repealed | PDF ↗ |
| PB 105 of 2023 | 30 Oct 2023 | Repealed | PDF ↗ |
| PB 106 of 2023 | 30 Oct 2023 | Repealed | PDF ↗ |