← The record

Fluticasone Furoate / Umeclidinium / Vilanterol

Recommended RespiratoryAuthority RequiredLater-line line 💬 consumer voice

Maintenance treatment of severe asthma in adults who are not adequately controlled with a combination of inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting beta2 agonist.

3
Submissions
1 resub
2017–21
On the record
ICER range
Cost-min
Cost basis

Decision on record

1 decision
  • Meeting Nov 2021 Recommended Severe asthma

Access path

3 submissions · public record
  1. Dec 2017
    Recommended · restricted

    vs fluticasone propionate 500 mcg/salmeterol 50 mcg FDC twice…

  2. Mar 2019
    Recommended · restricted

    Comparator changed: fluticasone propionate 500 mcg/salmeterol 50 mcg FDC twice daily plus…

  3. Nov 2021
    Recommended · restricted

    Comparator changed: dual therapy LAMA/LABA (UMEC 62.5mcg / VI 25mcg) → mometasone…

  4. PBS listing · Authority Required
RecommendedDeferredNot recommended

From the public summary

Verbatim · PSD text · may span indications
PBAC outcome
The PBAC recommended the Authority Required (STREAMLINED) listing of fluticasone furoate (FF) with vilanterol (VI) and umeclidinium (UMEC) fixed dose combination (FDC) for maintenance therapy of severe asthma. The recommended listing was for one strength: FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 mcg.PSD · Nov 2021
The PBAC considered the claim of non-inferior effectiveness and safety to the FDC of mometasone furoate (MF) 136 mcg, with indacaterol (IND) 114 mcg and glycopyrronium (GLY) 46 mcg was reasonable. However, the PBAC considered for purposes of satisfying Section 101(3B) of the National Health Act 1953, any high dose inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) with long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA) + tiotropium (TIO) combination are relevant alternative therapies.PSD · Nov 2021
Economic analysis
The submission presented a cost-minimisation analysis comparing FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 and MF/IND/GLY 136/114/46, the main comparator, and versus high dose ICS/LABA + TIO. The analysis assumed no additional costs or cost-offsets. The PBAC considered this was appropriate.PSD · Nov 2021
The submission proposed the following equi-effective doses based on the trial evidence presented:  FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 one actuation daily = MF/IND/GLY 136/114/46 one actuation daily.PSD · Nov 2021
Clinical claim
FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 has similar or comparable safety compared with MF/IND/GLY 136/114/46 as well as high dose ICS/LABA Source: Table 1, p16 of the submission.PSD · Nov 2021
ACQ-7: Asthma Control Questionnaire; AE: adverse event; AQLQ: Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire; FDC: fixed dose combination; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in one second; FF: fluticasone furoate; GLY: glycopyrronium; ICS: inhaled corticosteroid; IND: indacaterol; LABA: long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonist; LAMA: long-acting muscarinic receptor antagonist; MF: mometasone furoate; SAE: serious adverse event; TIO: tiotropium; UMEC: umeclidinium VI: …PSD · Nov 2021
Consumer comments
The PBAC noted and welcomed the input from health care professionals (1) and organisations (2) via the Consumer Comments facility on the PBS website. The comments described a range of benefits of treatment with FF/UMEC/VI including that single inhaler triple therapy provides a treatment option for ICS/LAMA/LABA therapy that is likely less costly and more convenient than mixing device types.PSD · Nov 2021
Financial management – risk sharing
The pre-PBAC response proposed a risk sharing arrangement (RSA) as a mechanism to reduce the perceived risk of inappropriate prescribing to the PBS budget instead of an Authority Required (telephone/online) listing. For more detail on PBAC’s view, see section 7 PBAC outcome.PSD · Nov 2021

Cost-effectiveness

Cost-minimisation analysis; no ICER calculated by design.

The submission presented a cost-minimisation analysis comparing FF/UMEC/VI 200/62.5/25 and MF/IND/GLY 136/114/46, the main comparator, and versus high dose ICS/LABA + TIO. The analysis assumed no additional costs or cost-offsets. The PBAC considered this was appropriate. PBAC · 2021
Surrogate endpointCost-effectiveness accepted

Decision context

PopulationAdults aged 18 years or over with severe asthma who remain uncontrolled on inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting beta2 agonist therapy despite correct inhaler technique and good adherence, and who have experienced at least one severe exacerbation requiring systemic corticosteroids in the previous 12 months.

Submission history

3 entries
DecidedOutcomeComparatorICEREvidence
Nov 2021 Recommended · restricted mometasone furoate/indacaterol/glycopyrronium (MF/IND/GLY) 136/114/46 mcg and high dose ICS/LABA + tiotropium RCT · Trough FEV1
Mar 2019 Recommended · restricted dual therapy LAMA/LABA (UMEC 62.5mcg / VI 25mcg) RCT · Annual rate of exacerbations
Dec 2017 Recommended · restricted fluticasone propionate 500 mcg/salmeterol 50 mcg FDC twice daily plus tiotropium 18 mcg once daily; LAMA/LABA FDC combin RCT · PFS

Clinical evidence

Trials cited in the PSDs · ClinicalTrials.gov
TrialPhaseNPrimary outcomeStatus
ILLUMINATE Ph 3 523 Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second Area Under the Curve (FEV1 AUC) 0-12 completed
DB2116134 Ph 3 717 Change From Baseline (BL) in 0 to 24 Hour Weighted Mean Serial Forced Expiratory Volume in… completed

Consumer voice

Nov 2021

Healthcare professionals and organisations noted benefits of single inhaler triple therapy (FF/UMEC/VI) as a more convenient and potentially less costly option compared to mixed devices, while expressing concerns about the complexity and time-consuming nature of the PBS authority process for asthma compared to COPD.

single inhaler triple therapy provides a treatment option for ICS/LAMA/LABA therapy that is likely less costly and more convenient than mixing device types Consumer comments · PSD
treatment conveniencecost efficiencyaccess barriersadministrative burden

Similar precedents

By decision profile

Regulatory · TGA

Label narrower than PBS population — PBAC restricts to severe asthma with recent exacerbation requiring systemic corticosteroids; TGA label covers all inadequately controlled asthma on ICS/LABA.