script.reportAU
Respiratory

Umeclidinium bromide and vilanterol trifenatate

Brand: Anoro Ellipta

PBAC's latest decision on Umeclidinium bromide and vilanterol trifenatate: Not recommended (2014). Considered for Treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in adults where symptoms persist despite regular bronchodilator treatment with a long acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) and/or long acting beta2 agonist (LABA), or in patients stabilised on a combination of LAMA and LABA in separate devices.

PBAC outcome
Not recommended
Restricted
ICER (AUD/QALY)
Cost-min
cost-minimisation analysis
Submissions
1
first 2014
Submissions
1
2014 → 2014

Eligible population

Adult patients with COPD where symptoms persist despite regular bronchodilator treatment with LAMA and/or LABA, or patients stabilised on combination LAMA and LABA in separate devices

Therapy area
Respiratory
Line of therapy
Later-line
Evidence base
RCT
Primary endpoint
Surrogate
Pivotal trial size
1,364 patients
Key trials
DB2113360, DB2113361, DB2113373, DB2113374, INTRUST1, INTRUST2, SHINE, ENLIGHTEN
Comparator
tiotropium plus indacaterol
Economic model
Cost-minimisation
ICER note
Cost-minimisation analysis; no ICER calculated by design

Why PBAC said no

Reasons cited in the latest PSD: Absence of individual components (umeclidinium and vilanterol) on PBS is problematic for stepwise treatment; risks of inappropriate early combination therapy transition and potential double-dosing of LABAs; no superiority demonstrated over comparator on clinically relevant outcomes; concerns regarding safety profile with higher adverse event and serious adverse event rates in some trials; safety risks from potential prescribing errors and incorrect dosing of FDC products

Similar precedents

Open on full dashboard →