Dolutegravir/RilpivirineJuluca
Treatment of virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients. The fixed dose combination is indicated for use in virologically suppressed patients switching from current antiretroviral therapy.
Decision on record
- Meeting Jul 2018 Recommended Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
Access path
- TGA registered · Juluca
TGA label narrower than the PBS population
- Jul 2018Recommended · restricted
vs dolutegravir 50mg plus rilpivirine 25mg taken concomitantly…
- PBS listing · Restricted
From the public summary
7.1 The PBAC recommended the listing of the combination drug dolutegravir with rilpivirine (Juluca®) on the basis that it should be available only under special arrangements under section 100 (Highly Specialised Drugs Program – Community Access) and only in the circumstances: Authority Required (STREAMLINED) for treatment of virologically suppressed human immune deficiency virus (HIV) infected patients.PSD · Jul 2018
7.2 For reason’s explained further below, the PBAC’s recommendation for listing was based on, among other matters, its assessment that the cost‐effectiveness of Juluca would be acceptable if it were cost‐minimised against a mixed comparator of Eviplera® (TDF/FTC/RPV)/Stribild® (TDF/FTC/EVG/c) and Odefsey® (TAF/FTC/RPV)/Genvoya® (TAF/FTC/EVG/c), the latter accounting for the small patient population (6% of the total population) ineligible to receive a TDF …PSD · Jul 2018
6.23 The submission conducted a cost‐minimisation analysis against the primary comparator of dolutegravir 50mg + rilpivirine 25mg taken concomitantly, and the secondary comparator of a basket of antiretrovirals.PSD · Jul 2018
6.24 For the primary comparator, the submission estimated that one FDC tablet of dolutegravir 50mg/rilpivirine 25mg was equivalent to one tablet each of dolutegravir 50mg (Tivicay®) + rilpivirine 25mg (Edurant®).PSD · Jul 2018
6.18 The submission described Juluca as bioequivalent to DTG+RPV. The TGA has accepted this claim.PSD · Jul 2018
6.19 The submission also described Juluca as non‐inferior compared to a basket of comparators representative of the current treatment switch landscape in Australian HIV patients. The evaluation considered this claim (assumed to be in regards to comparative effectiveness and comparative safety) was reasonable; however, noted that the SWORD 1&2 trials indicated non‐inferiority to current‐antiretroviral therapy, including multiple comparators that the …PSD · Jul 2018
Cost-effectiveness
Cost-minimisation analysis conducted; no ICER calculated as this was a cost-minimisation comparison against individual components
Decision context
PopulationVirologically suppressed HIV-infected patients who are stable and virologically suppressed on previous HIV treatment regimen for at least 6 months prior to treatment initiation
Submission history
| Decided | Outcome | Comparator | ICER | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2018 | Recommended · restricted | dolutegravir 50mg plus rilpivirine 25mg taken concomitantly (DTG+RPV) | — | RCT · Virological success (HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL) |
Similar precedents
Regulatory · TGA
Label narrower than PBS population — PBAC restricts to patients stable and virologically suppressed for ≥6 months prior; TGA label lacks this temporal stability requirement.