RaltegravirIsentress and Isentress HD
Treatment of HIV-1 infection in combination with other antiretroviral agents, in treatment-naïve patients, treatment-experienced patients, and patients virologically suppressed on raltegravir 400 mg twice daily.
Decisions on record
- Meeting Nov 2017 Recommended Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection no PSD
- Meeting Jul 2017 Deferred Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
- Meeting Mar 2008 Recommended Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)
Access path
- TGA registered · Isentress and Isentress HD
TGA label narrower than the PBS population
- Mar 2008Recommended · restricted
vs placebo plus optimal background therapy; darunavir…
- Jul 2017Deferred
Comparator changed: placebo plus optimal background therapy; darunavir (secondary…
From the public summary
7.1 The PBAC was of a mind to recommend raltegravir 600 mg tablets be listed on the PBS for the treatment of HIV infection on a cost-minimisation basis compared with raltegravir 400 mg tablets, noting that raltegravir 600 mg tablets should be available only under special arrangements under Section 100 – Highly Specialised Drugs Program (Community Access).PSD · Jul 2017
7.2 The PBAC considered that the restriction for raltegravir 600 mg tablets should be aligned with that for raltegravir 400 mg tablets, and for other single agent integrase inhibitors listed on the PBS.PSD · Jul 2017
6.16 Given the claim of non-inferior efficacy and safety, a cost-minimisation approach was appropriate.PSD · Jul 2017
6.17 The equi-effective doses were estimated as raltegravir 1200 mg QD and raltegravir 400 mg BID, each as continuous therapy. These estimates were derived from the results of the randomised head-to-head Trial PN292. The PBAC considered these estimates are reasonable for treatment naïve and treatment-experienced patients.PSD · Jul 2017
6.9 The submission’s clinical claim is that: “once daily raltegravir 1200 mg, taken with Truvada® as backbone therapy, has non- inferior efficacy compared to raltegravir 400 mg BID, taken with Truvada® as backbone therapy, in the treatment of HIV-1 infection” (p.69 of the submission). The submission further claimed that its analysis of safety demonstrated raltegravir QD is well tolerated and has a safety profile comparable to raltegravir 400 mg BID.PSD · Jul 2017
6.10 The therapeutic conclusion regarding efficacy was supported in HIV-1 infected patients who are treatment-naïve and treated in combination with Truvada® as a backbone therapy which was derived from the results of a single, randomised, head- to-head, double-blind, non-inferiority trial over 48 weeks. The primary outcome was based upon an objective laboratory test of HIV RNA <40 copies/mL.PSD · Jul 2017
Cost-effectiveness
Cost-minimisation analysis; no ICER calculated as equi-effective doses were accepted.
The PBAC accepted cost-minimisation on the basis of equi-effective doses of raltegravir 1,200 mg once daily (two 600 mg tablets) and raltegravir 400 mg twice daily. PBAC · 2017
Decision context
PopulationHIV-1 infected patients (treatment-naïve, treatment-experienced, and patients virologically suppressed on raltegravir 400 mg twice daily) weighing >40 kg, treated in combination with other antiretroviral agents.
Submission history
| Decided | Outcome | Comparator | ICER | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2017 | Deferred | raltegravir 400 mg tablets twice daily | — | RCT · HIV RNA <40 |
| Mar 2008 | Recommended · restricted | placebo plus optimal background therapy; darunavir (secondary comparator) | $45k–75k | RCT · Surrogate |
Similar precedents
Regulatory · TGA
Label narrower than PBS population — PBAC restricts to patients weighing >40 kg; TGA label contains no weight restriction.