← The record

Darunavir With Cobicistat With Emtricitabine And Tenofovir AlafenamideSYMTUZA

Recommended · restricted Infectious diseaseAuthority RequiredFirst-line line

Treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in adults and adolescents ≥40 kg, for both treatment-naïve patients and treatment-experienced patients with virological or clinical failure.

1
Submissions
2019–19
On the record
ICER range
Cost-min
Cost basis

Access path

1 submission · public record
  1. TGA registered · SYMTUZA

    TGA label narrower than the PBS population

  2. Nov 2019
    Recommended · restricted

    vs Prezcobix (darunavir/cobicistat) with a mixed comparator of…

  3. PBS listing · Authority Required
RecommendedDeferredNot recommended

From the public summary

Verbatim · PSD text · may span indications
PBAC outcome
7.1 The PBAC recommended the Authority Required (STREAMLINED) listing of the combination drug darunavir with cobicistat with emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide (DRV/c/FTC/TAF, Symtuza) for the treatment of HIV infection, on the 15PSD · Nov 2019
7.2 The PBAC’s recommendation for listing was based on, among other matters, it’s assessment that the cost-effectiveness of Symtuza would be acceptable if it were cost- minimised against the following:  Prezcobix (DRV/c ); with  A mixed comparator of Truvada (FTC/TDF) and Descovy (FTC/TAF) at a relative weighting of 94:6, the latter accounting for a small patient population (6% of the total population) who are ineligible to receive a TDF-based regimen …PSD · Nov 2019
Economic analysis
6.23 Table 8 presents a summary of the submission’s approach to the cost minimisation analysis (CMA). 11PSD · Nov 2019
Based on evidence presented in Section 2, effectiveness is assumed to be non-inferior effectiveness Therapeutic claim: safety Based on evidence presented in Section 2, safety is assumed to be non-inferior Direct comparison of Symtuza and CAR in EMERALD or Prezcobix +Truvada in AMBER and Evidence base Mills 2015 trials Symtuza (800mg darunavir/150mg cobicistat/ 200mg emtricitabine and 10mg Tenofovir alafenamide) =  1 x Prezcobix (DRV/c 800mg/150mg) …PSD · Nov 2019
Clinical claim
boosted darunavir (DRV/c or DRV+r) co-administered with FTC/tenofovir (TAF or TDF) regimens Source: Table 1.1, p13 of the submission.PSD · Nov 2019
6.18 The submission claimed that the efficacy of Symtuza is non-inferior to boosted darunavir co-administered with FTC/tenofovir (both TDF and TAF), as assessed by the clinically relevant outcomes of viral rebound, virologic response and change in CD4+ cell count. Additionally, Symtuza is bioequivalent to concomitant administration of its components, and therefore is non-inferior in efficacy and safety.PSD · Nov 2019

Cost-effectiveness

Cost-minimisation analysis conducted; no ICER calculated as this is a cost-minimisation comparison of equi-effective regimens

Cost-effectiveness accepted

Decision context

PopulationAdults and adolescents ≥40 kg with HIV infection, including treatment-naïve patients and treatment-experienced patients who have experienced virological or clinical failure after at least one antiretroviral regimen

Submission history

1 entries
DecidedOutcomeComparatorICEREvidence
Nov 2019 Recommended · restricted Prezcobix (darunavir/cobicistat) with a mixed comparator of Truvada (emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) and De RCT · Virological suppression

Similar precedents

By decision profile

Regulatory · TGA

Label narrower than PBS population — PBAC restricts to patients ≥40 kg and specifies treatment-naïve or treatment-experienced with prior virological/clinical failure; TGA label unrestricted.