← The record

Darunavir + CobicistatPREZCOBIX

Recommended · restricted Infectious diseaseAuthority RequiredFirst-line line

Treatment of HIV-1 infection in combination with other antiretroviral agents in antiretroviral treatment-naïve patients and in treatment-experienced patients with no darunavir resistance-associated mutations.

1
Submissions
1 resub
2016–16
On the record
ICER range
Cost-min
Cost basis

Access path

1 submission · public record
  1. TGA registered · PREZCOBIX

    TGA label narrower than the PBS population

  2. Mar 2016
    Recommended · restricted

    vs For treatment-experienced: darunavir 800 mg + ritonavir 100…

  3. PBS listing · Authority Required
RecommendedDeferredNot recommended

From the public summary

Verbatim · PSD text · may span indications
PBAC outcome
7.1 The PBAC recommended the Section 100 Highly Specialised Drugs Program (HSD) listing of darunavir with cobicistat fixed dose combination for the treatment of HIV.PSD · Mar 2016
The PBAC recommended the special arrangements under the HSD Community Access Program, Authority Required (STREAMLINED).PSD · Mar 2016
Economic analysis
6.12 The submission presented a cost-minimisation analysis (CMA). Prices used in the cost minimisation have been updated to reflect the S100 HSD Community Access prices for HIV medicines. 6.13 The equi-effective doses were estimated as:PSD · Mar 2016
For treatment experienced patients:  darunavir 800 mg (with cobicistat 150 mg in the FDC) once daily is equivalent to darunavir 800 mg (with ritonavir 100 mg taken concomitantly) once daily; and  cobicistat 150 mg (in the FDC) once daily is equivalent to ritonavir 100 mg (with darunavir 800 mg) once daily.PSD · Mar 2016
Clinical claim
6.9 Based from the pharmacokinetic evidence presented in November 2015, the PBAC considered that the claim of non-inferior comparative effectiveness and safety against darunavir and cobicistat taken concomitantly was reasonable.PSD · Mar 2016
6.10 Based from the pharmacokinetic evidence presented above in November 2015, the PBAC considered that the claim of non-inferior comparative effectiveness and safety against darunavir and ritonavir taken concomitantly was reasonable.PSD · Mar 2016
Consumer comments
6.2 The PBAC noted and welcomed the input from organisations (2) via the Consumer Comments facility on the PBS website. The comments described benefits of treatment with darunavir/cobicistat including improvement in adherence, some savings on co-payment and possibility of fewer side-effects compared to ritonavir boosted darunavir.PSD · Nov 2015

Cost-effectiveness

Cost-minimisation analysis conducted; no ICER calculated

Cost-effectiveness accepted

Decision context

PopulationAdults with HIV-1 infection who are antiretroviral treatment-naïve or treatment-experienced with no darunavir resistance-associated mutations

Submission history

1 entries
DecidedOutcomeComparatorICEREvidence
Mar 2016 Recommended · restricted For treatment-experienced: darunavir 800 mg + ritonavir 100 mg. For treatment-naïve: atazanavir 300 mg + ritonavir 100 m Single-arm · Surrogate

Clinical evidence

Trials cited in the PSDs · ClinicalTrials.gov
TrialPhaseNPrimary outcomeStatus
ODIN Ph 3 590 Virological Response at Week 48 (Number of Participants With Plasma Viral Load Less Than 5… completed
FLAMINGO Ph 3 488 Percentage of Participants With Plasma Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 (HIV-1) Ribonucleic … completed

Similar precedents

By decision profile

Regulatory · TGA

Label narrower than PBS population — PBAC excludes treatment-experienced PI-naïve patients without genotype testing, a group included in TGA label.