Darunavir + CobicistatPREZCOBIX
Recommended · restricted Infectious diseaseAuthority RequiredFirst-line line
Treatment of HIV-1 infection in combination with other antiretroviral agents in antiretroviral treatment-naïve patients and in treatment-experienced patients with no darunavir resistance-associated mutations.
1
Submissions
1 resub
2016–16
On the record
—
ICER range
Cost-min
Cost basis
Access path
- TGA registered · PREZCOBIX
TGA label narrower than the PBS population
- Mar 2016Recommended · restricted
vs For treatment-experienced: darunavir 800 mg + ritonavir 100…
- PBS listing · Authority Required
RecommendedDeferredNot recommended
From the public summary
PBAC outcome
7.1 The PBAC recommended the Section 100 Highly Specialised Drugs Program (HSD) listing of darunavir with cobicistat fixed dose combination for the treatment of HIV.PSD · Mar 2016
The PBAC recommended the special arrangements under the HSD Community Access Program, Authority Required (STREAMLINED).PSD · Mar 2016
Economic analysis
6.12 The submission presented a cost-minimisation analysis (CMA). Prices used in the cost minimisation have been updated to reflect the S100 HSD Community Access prices for HIV medicines. 6.13 The equi-effective doses were estimated as:PSD · Mar 2016
For treatment experienced patients: darunavir 800 mg (with cobicistat 150 mg in the FDC) once daily is equivalent to darunavir 800 mg (with ritonavir 100 mg taken concomitantly) once daily; and cobicistat 150 mg (in the FDC) once daily is equivalent to ritonavir 100 mg (with darunavir 800 mg) once daily.PSD · Mar 2016
Clinical claim
6.9 Based from the pharmacokinetic evidence presented in November 2015, the PBAC considered that the claim of non-inferior comparative effectiveness and safety against darunavir and cobicistat taken concomitantly was reasonable.PSD · Mar 2016
6.10 Based from the pharmacokinetic evidence presented above in November 2015, the PBAC considered that the claim of non-inferior comparative effectiveness and safety against darunavir and ritonavir taken concomitantly was reasonable.PSD · Mar 2016
Consumer comments
6.2 The PBAC noted and welcomed the input from organisations (2) via the Consumer Comments facility on the PBS website. The comments described benefits of treatment with darunavir/cobicistat including improvement in adherence, some savings on co-payment and possibility of fewer side-effects compared to ritonavir boosted darunavir.PSD · Nov 2015
Cost-effectiveness
Cost-minimisation analysis conducted; no ICER calculated
Cost-effectiveness accepted
Decision context
PopulationAdults with HIV-1 infection who are antiretroviral treatment-naïve or treatment-experienced with no darunavir resistance-associated mutations
Submission history
| Decided | Outcome | Comparator | ICER | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2016 | Recommended · restricted | For treatment-experienced: darunavir 800 mg + ritonavir 100 mg. For treatment-naïve: atazanavir 300 mg + ritonavir 100 m | — | Single-arm · Surrogate |
Clinical evidence
Similar precedents
Regulatory · TGA
Label narrower than PBS population — PBAC excludes treatment-experienced PI-naïve patients without genotype testing, a group included in TGA label.