← The record

Topotecan

Recommended OncologyUnrestrictedLater-line line 💬 consumer voice

Treatment of metastatic carcinoma of the ovary after failure of first-line or subsequent therapy; small cell lung carcinoma after failure of first-line chemotherapy; and in combination with cisplatin for treatment of patients with histologically confirmed Stage IC-B, recurrent, or persistent carcinoma of the cervix not amenable to curative treatment with surgery and/or radiation therapy.

3
Submissions
2010–20
On the record
$15k–45k
ICER range
2 sourced ICERs · 2010
Cost-min
Cost basis

Decisions on record

2 decisions
  • Meeting Jul 2020 Recommended Metastatic ovarian cancer
  • Meeting Jul 2010 Not recommended Anti-cancer drug

Access path

3 submissions · public record
  1. Jul 2010
    Not recommended

    uncertain clinical benefit, high and uncertain incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, poorly defined restriction…

  2. Jul 2010
    Not recommended

    uncertain clinical benefit, high and uncertain incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, poorly defined trial population…

  3. ↻ resubmitted
    Jul 2020
    Recommended · restricted

    Comparator changed: best supportive care → Hycamtin (topotecan)

  4. PBS listing · Unrestricted
RecommendedDeferredNot recommended

From the public summary

Verbatim · PSD text · may span indications
PBAC outcome
6.1 The PBAC recommended the listing of a new form of topotecan, solution concentrate for I.V. infusion 4 mg in 4 mL (as hydrochloride), as an unrestricted benefit, on the basis that it should be available only under special arrangements under Section 100 (Efficient Funding of Chemotherapy).PSD · Jul 2020
6.2 The PBAC noted that the TGA considered the new form of topotecan to be bioequivalent to the currently listed form of topotecan, Hycamtin.PSD · Jul 2020
Consumer comments
5.2 The PBAC noted and welcomed the input from organisations (2) via the Consumer Comments facility on the PBS website. Lung Foundation Australia described a range of benefits of listing a Topotecan Accord including a greater certainty of supply due to an alternative supplier as well as offering an effective alternative treatment for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) on the PBS.PSD · Jul 2020
5.3 The Medical Oncology Group of Australia (MOGA) also expressed its strong support for the Topotecan Accord submission, categorising it as one of the therapies of “highest priority for PBS listing” on the basis of improvements in overall survival and quality of life. The PBAC noted that the MOGA presented a European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) for Topotecan 2PSD · Jul 2020

Cost-effectiveness

2 sourced ICERs · 2010

Cost-minimisation analysis; no ICER calculated as Topotecan Accord is bioequivalent to Hycamtin with no expected improvement in efficacy or reduction in toxicity.

The PBAC noted that the results of the sensitivity analyses indicate that the model is most sensitive to variation in the assumptions used for calculating the utility values and the subgroup analyses assessing the effect of male gender and the presence of liver metastases. PBAC · 2010
ICER uncertainEconomic model disputedNo head-to-head trialIndirect comparison

Decision context

PopulationPatients with advanced metastatic ovarian cancer who have failed prior therapy including a platinum compound; also indicated for small cell lung cancer and cervical cancer as per TGA registration.

Submission history

3 entries
DecidedOutcomeComparatorICEREvidence
Jul 2020 Recommended · restricted Hycamtin (topotecan) Cost-minimisation · Cost-minimisation
Jul 2010 Not recommended best supportive care $15k–45k RCT, Indirect comparison · OS
Jul 2010 Not recommended best supportive care $15k–45k RCT · OS

Consumer voice

Jul 2020

Lung Foundation Australia and the Medical Oncology Group of Australia both supported listing of Topotecan Accord, citing benefits including supply certainty, effective treatment for small cell lung cancer, improvements in overall survival and quality of life.

Lung Foundation Australia described a range of benefits of listing a Topotecan Accord including a greater certainty of supply due to an alternative supplier as well as offering an effective alternative treatment for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) on the PBS. Consumer comments · PSD
unmet needtreatment efficacyquality of lifesupply certaintysurvival benefit

Similar precedents

By decision profile

Regulatory · TGA

Label narrower than PBS population — PBAC specifies later-line treatment and platinum-failure requirement; TGA label permits first-line failure onwards without explicit platinum-prior criterion.