← The record

Mirikizumab

Noted GastroenterologyRestrictedLater-line line 💬 consumer voice

Treatment of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis in adult patients who have had an inadequate response with, lost response to, or were intolerant to conventional therapy.

1
Submissions
2023–23
On the record
ICER range
Cost-min
Cost basis

Decisions on record

2 decisions
  • Meeting Jul 2025 Noted Ulcerative colitis no PSD
  • Meeting Jul 2023 Recommended Moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (MSUC)

Access path

1 submission · public record
  1. Jul 2023
    Recommended · restricted

    vs vedolizumab

  2. PBS listing · Restricted
RecommendedDeferredNot recommended

From the public summary

Verbatim · PSD text · may span indications
PBAC outcome
The PBAC recommended the Section 100 (Highly Specialised Drugs Program) and General Schedule listings of mirikizumab (MIRI) for the treatment of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (MSUC). The Section 100 recommendation was for listing the vial for intravenous (IV) infusion for initial treatment, and the General Schedule listing was for the pre-filled pen for subcutaneous (SC) injection for maintenance therapy.PSD · Jul 2023
The PBAC’s recommendation for listing was based on, among other matters, its assessment the cost effectiveness of MIRI would be acceptable if it were cost minimised to the least costly alternative therapy of adalimumab (ADA), golimumab (GOL), infliximab (IFX), ozanimod (OZA), tofacitinib (TOF), ustekinumab (UST), upadacitinib (UPA) and vedolizumab (VDZ).PSD · Jul 2023
Economic analysis
The submission presented a cost-minimisation approach comparing MIRI with VDZ (IV formulation only), assuming equivalent total costs over the first two years (104 weeks), and accounting for IV infusion administration costs. Given VDZ is subject to a Special Pricing Arrangement and the effective AEMP was unknown to the sponsor, the results presented in the submission used the published AEMP.PSD · Jul 2023
The proposed equi-effective doses were based on the recommended doses:PSD · Jul 2023
Clinical claim
Near market comparator: MIRI is clinically non-inferior in terms of efficacy and comparable in terms of safety versus UST. Source: Table 1, p31 of the submission.PSD · Jul 2023
ADA=adalimumab, IV=Intravenous, MIRI=mirikizumab, MSUC=moderate to severe ulcerative colitis, SC=Subcutaneous, UST=ustekinumab, VDZ=vedolizumab. * The submission nominated VDZ IV as the main comparator, but patients can switch to VDZ 108 mg SC injection every 2 weeks from Week 6 after the first two IV infusions (Week 0 and 2). ^ UST IV 260 mg for weight ≤ 55 kg; UST IV 390 mg for weight > 55 kg to ≤ 85 kg; UST IV 520 mg for weight > 85 kg.PSD · Jul 2023

Cost-effectiveness

Cost-minimisation analysis undertaken; no ICER calculated by design.

The submission presented a cost-minimisation approach comparing MIRI with VDZ (IV formulation only), assuming equivalent total costs over the first two years (104 weeks), and accounting for IV infusion administration costs. PSD · 2023

Decision context

PopulationAdult patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis who have had an inadequate response with, lost response to, or were intolerant to conventional therapy.

Submission history

1 entries
DecidedOutcomeComparatorICEREvidence
Jul 2023 Recommended · restricted vedolizumab RCT · Clinical remission, clinical response

Consumer voice

Jul 2023

A healthcare professional noted that despite available therapies for MSUC, a significant proportion of patients do not respond and require surgery, highlighting the need for more effective medical therapy options through the PBS. The comment identified MIRI's high safety profile and convenient subcutaneous maintenance dosing as key benefits.

a significant proportion of patients do not respond to therapies available and require surgery Consumer comments · PSD
unmet needtreatment burdenaccess barrierssafety profileconvenience

Similar precedents

By decision profile

Regulatory · TGA

Label narrower than PBS population — PBAC restricts to conventional therapy failure only; TGA label includes biologic and JAK inhibitor failures.