← The record

MecaserminIncrelex

Recommended EndocrinologyAuthority RequiredInitial treatment line 💬 consumer voice

Long-term treatment of growth failure in children and adolescents from 2 to 18 years with severe primary insulin-like growth factor 1 deficiency (Primary IGFD).

2
Submissions
1 resub
2021–22
On the record
Redacted
ICER range
commercial-in-confidence
Redacted
Cost basis
risk sharing

Decisions on record

2 decisions
  • Meeting Mar 2022 Recommended Primary insulin-like growth factor 1 deficiency
  • Meeting Nov 2021 Not recommended Primary insulin-like growth factor 1 deficiency (Primary IGFD)

Access path

2 submissions · public record
  1. TGA registered · Increlex

    TGA label narrower than the PBS population

  2. Nov 2021
    Not recommended

    vs no treatment

  3. ↻ resubmitted
    Mar 2022
    Recommended · restricted
  4. PBS listing · Authority Required
RecommendedDeferredNot recommended

From the public summary

Verbatim · PSD text · may span indications
PBAC outcome
5.1 The PBAC recommended the listing of mecasermin on the basis that it be available on a Section 100 Growth Hormone (GH) Program listing for the long-term treatment of growth failure in children and adolescents from 2 to 18 years with severe primary insulin-like growth factor 1 deficiency (Primary IGFD).PSD · Mar 2022
5.2 The PBAC considered that mecasermin would address an unmet clinical need, as there are no other reimbursed or TGA registered options for this patient population.PSD · Mar 2022
Economic analysis
4.5 In November 2021, the PBAC considered that the ICER was unacceptably high and uncertain, and that a price reduction would be requiredPSD · Mar 2022
4.6 The resubmission requested the same price as the November 2021 submission and stated that a price reduction was not feasible. 7PSD · Mar 2022
Clinical claim
Source: Table 1-2, p17 and Section 2, p90 of the submission.PSD · Nov 2021
The submission described mecasermin as superior in terms of effectiveness compared with no treatment, based on changes in height over time and near-adult height.PSD · Nov 2021
Consumer comments
The PBAC noted and welcomed the input from a health care professional. The input described a range of benefits of long term treatment with mecasermin including improved growth and potentially improved neurodevelopmental function including motor as well as social function.PSD · Nov 2021
Financial management – risk sharing
4.11 The resubmission (p19) proposed annual caps on PBS expenditure and stated that the sponsor would rebate % of the overall expenditure above the capped amount. The PBAC considered that adjustment to the estimates was required (see paragraph 4.9). For more detail on PBAC’s view, see section 5 PBAC outcome.PSD · Mar 2022

Cost-effectiveness

ICER not stated in resubmission. At November 2021 meeting, PBAC considered ICER unacceptably high and uncertain; price reduction was required but resubmission stated price reduction was not feasible.

In November 2021, the PBAC considered that the ICER was unacceptably high and uncertain, and that a price reduction would be required PBAC · 2022
ICER uncertainICER / price too highPrice cut / RSA needed

Decision context

PopulationChildren and adolescents from 2 to 18 years (up to 19th birthday) with severe primary insulin-like growth factor 1 deficiency (IGFD), defined as basal IGF-1 level below the 2.5th percentile adjusted for age and gender; with short stature at least 3 standard deviations below norm; with slow growth (baseline height velocity less than 25th percentile for bone age); without growth hormone deficiency; with bone age less than 13.5 years in girls or 15.5 years in boys; without secondary causes of IGFD; and without epiphyseal closure.

Risk sharingRisk sharing arrangement proposed whereby a percentage rebate would apply above a cap threshold to provide certainty of overall PBS expenditure.

Submission history

2 entries
DecidedOutcomeComparatorICEREvidence
Mar 2022 Recommended · restricted no treatment RCT · Height
Nov 2021 Not recommended no treatment RCT · Height velocity

Consumer voice

Mar 2022

No consumer comments were received for this item.

The PBAC noted that no consumer comments were received for this item. Consumer comments · PSD

Similar precedents

By decision profile

Regulatory · TGA

Label narrower than PBS population — PBAC adds specific biochemical, auxological, and bone age criteria not stated in the TGA label.