← The record

Levodopa With CarbidopaAPO-LEVODOPA/CARBIDOPA

Recommended NeurologyRestrictedMaintenance therapy line 💬 consumer voice

Advanced Parkinson's disease with severe disabling motor fluctuations not adequately controlled by oral therapy.

3
Submissions
1 resub
2008–16
On the record
$45k–75k
ICER range
2 sourced ICERs · 2008–2010
Not modelled
Cost basis

Decisions on record

2 decisions
  • Meeting Nov 2010 Recommended Parkinson disease
  • Meeting Mar 2008 Not recommended Parkinson’s disease

Access path

3 submissions · public record
  1. TGA registered · APO-LEVODOPA/CARBIDOPA

    TGA label narrower than the PBS population

  2. Mar 2008
    Not recommended

    unacceptably high and uncertain incremental cost effectiveness ratio, small trial populations with treatment…

  3. ↻ resubmitted
    Nov 2010
    Recommended · restricted

    Comparator changed: standard medical management (mix of suboptimal oral medication…

  4. Nov 2016
    Recommended

    Evidence: RCT → Other

  5. PBS listing · Restricted
RecommendedDeferredNot recommended

From the public summary

Verbatim · PSD text · may span indications
PBAC outcome
6.1 The PBAC recommended the removal of the current wording ‘a positive clinical response to Duodopa® administered via a temporary nasoduodenal tube should be confirmed before a permanent percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube is inserted’ from the Note section under the restriction of levodopa with carbidopa on the basis that this is a clinical practice decision.PSD · Nov 2016
6.2 The PBAC noted the update to the PI for Duodopa® and considered that the nasojejunal test phase may be exempted under the discretion of a physician. In this situation, it is appropriate to initiate the treatment directly with placement of the PEG-J.PSD · Nov 2016

Cost-effectiveness

2 sourced ICERs · 2008–2010

Minor submission with no economic comparison.

The PBAC therefore rejected the submission on the basis of the unacceptably high and uncertain incremental cost effectiveness ratio for levodopa with carbidopa gel compared to standard medical management. PBAC · 2008
ICER uncertain ×2ICER / price too highEconomic model disputedCost-effectiveness accepted

Decision context

PopulationPatients with advanced Parkinson's disease with severe disabling motor fluctuations not adequately controlled by oral therapy, commenced on treatment in a hospital-based movement disorder clinic, with adequate cognitive function to manage administration with a portable continuous infusion pump.

Submission history

3 entries
DecidedOutcomeComparatorICEREvidence
Nov 2016 Recommended Other
Nov 2010 Recommended · restricted oral therapy, apomorphine and deep brain stimulation $45k–75k RCT
Mar 2008 Not recommended standard medical management (mix of suboptimal oral medication including oral levodopa and carbidopa, and continuous sub $45k–75k RCT · Other

Consumer voice

Nov 2016

No consumer comments were received for this item.

The PBAC noted that no consumer comments were received for this item. Consumer comments · PSD

Similar precedents

By decision profile

Regulatory · TGA

Label narrower than PBS population — PBAC restricts to hospital-initiated therapy, adequate cognition, and portable pump management; TGA label has no such requirements.