← The record

Levodopa With Carbidopa And EntacaponeCARLEVENT

Noted NeurologyAuthority RequiredLater-line line 💬 consumer voice

Advanced idiopathic Parkinson's disease with severe motor fluctuations despite optimised alternative pharmacological treatment.

2
Submissions
1 resub
2024–24
On the record
ICER range
Cost-min
Cost basis
risk sharing

Decisions on record

5 decisions
  • Meeting Nov 2024 Noted Advanced Parkinson disease
  • Meeting Jul 2024 Recommended Advanced idiopathic Parkinson disease with severe motor fluctuations
  • Meeting Mar 2024 Not recommended Advanced idiopathic Parkinson disease with severe motor fluctuations
  • Meeting Mar 2010 Recommended Parkinson disease no PSD
  • Meeting Nov 2008 Recommended Parkinson disease no PSD

Access path

2 submissions · public record
  1. TGA registered · CARLEVENT

    TGA label narrower than the PBS population

  2. Mar 2024
    Not recommended

    vs levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG)

  3. ↻ resubmitted
    Nov 2024
    Noted

    Comparator changed: levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) → levodopa, carbidopa…

  4. PBS listing · Authority Required
RecommendedDeferredNot recommended

From the public summary

Verbatim · PSD text · may span indications
PBAC outcome
5.1 The PBAC recommended the S100 HSD and general schedule listing of levodopa with entacapone and carbidopa intestinal gel (LECIG) for the treatment of advanced idiopathic Parkinson disease with severe motor fluctuations despite optimised alternative pharmacological treatment.PSD · Jul 2024
5.2 With respect to the restriction, the PBAC recommended the PBS indication should be consistent with the LCIG PBS listing and state ‘Advanced Parkinson disease.’ In addition, the PBAC considered that it was appropriate for the clinical criteria to state ‘Patient must have severe disabling motor fluctuations not adequately controlled by at least one of: (i) oral therapy; (ii) intestinal gel formulation containing levodopa’.PSD · Jul 2024
Economic analysis
4.9 In March 2024, the PBAC noted the cost-minimisation approach (CMA) proposed by the submission was based on steady state dose-adjusted plasma levodopa concentrations observed in the LSM-003 study and assumed one cartridge of LECIG per day was equivalent to one cassette of LCIG per day (i.e. 1:1).PSD · Jul 2024
The mean dose does not Mean levodopa dose per March 2024 accurately account for all patients day from the LSM-003, Submission’s 1.00 cartridge 1.00 cassette requiring at least one cartridge of ELEGANCE, GLORIA, base case LECIG and a proportion requiring DUOGLOBE studies. a partial second cartridge per day.a This appropriately represented the Assuming 50% of patients proportion of patients using only used one LECIG cartridge one cartridge.PSD · Jul 2024
Clinical claim
4.8 In March 2024, the PBAC considered the clinical evidence that was presented in the submission (to support the clinical claim of non-inferior effectiveness of LECIG relative to LCIG) to have significant limitations, but on balance agreed with ESC and concluded that the clinical claim was likely reasonable (paragraph 7.7, levodopa with carbidopa and entacapone PSD, March 2024 PBAC Meeting).PSD · Jul 2024
Consumer comments
4.7 The PBAC noted that in Study LSM-003 patients received LECIG morning doses corresponding to 80% (n = 5) or 90% (n = 6) of their individual morning dose of LCIG, 80% of the LCIG maintenance dose, and 80% of extra doses (Senek 2017).PSD · Jul 2024
Financial management – risk sharing
4.17 The resubmission noted that LCIG is currently under a Risk Sharing Arrangement with annual financial caps. The resubmission anticipated that LECIG would be included in the same Risk Sharing Arrangement as LCIG with no increase in the financial caps required.PSD · Jul 2024
For more detail on PBAC’s view, see section 5 PBAC outcome. 12PSD · Jul 2024

Cost-effectiveness

Cost-minimisation analysis proposed; no numeric ICER calculated or stated

ICER uncertainEconomic model disputed

Decision context

PopulationAdults with advanced idiopathic Parkinson's disease and severe motor fluctuations not adequately controlled by at least one of: oral therapy or intestinal gel formulation containing levodopa

Risk sharingLECIG proposed to be included in the same risk-sharing arrangement as LCIG to mitigate financial risk to PBS of utilisation beyond base-case estimates

Submission history

2 entries
DecidedOutcomeComparatorICEREvidence
Nov 2024 Noted levodopa, carbidopa monohydrate intestinal gel (LCIG) Single-arm · Surrogate
Mar 2024 Not recommended levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) Single-arm · Non-inferiority in efficacy and safety compared to LCIG

Consumer voice

Nov 2024

Two individuals provided consumer input that focused on the impact of advanced Parkinson's Disease and highlighted the benefits of dose administration across an extended period over oral therapy requiring regular dosing.

the input focused on a treatment other than LECIG, but was useful in emphasising the impact of advanced Parkinson's Disease on people with the condition Consumer comments · PSD
treatment burdenunmet needquality of lifedosing convenience

Similar precedents

By decision profile

Regulatory · TGA

Label narrower than PBS population — PBAC restricts to treatment-naive failure and requires adequate cognitive function; specifies portable pump administration.