Lapatinib DitosylateTykerb
Metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer in patients who have received prior therapy with an anthracycline and a taxane, and whose disease progresses despite treatment with trastuzumab or who meet trastuzumab-exemption criteria.
Decisions on record
- Meeting Mar 2021 Noted Metastatic breast cancer no PSD
- Meeting Nov 2015 Recommended Metastatic (Stage IV) HER2 positive breast cancer no PSD
- Meeting Jul 2007 Not recommended Metastatic HER2 positive breast cancer
Access path
- TGA registered · Tykerb
TGA label narrower than the PBS population
- Nov 2007Recommended
Comparator changed: mixed comparator of five different agents weighted by usage:…
- Nov 2007Not recommended
uncertain proportion of patients continuing trastuzumab despite progression in Australian clinical practice (critical…
Cost-effectiveness
ICER varied widely depending on assumed extent of substitution of lapatinib for continued trastuzumab treatment; range given is for 50% trastuzumab 'continuers' scenario. ICER was dominant (less costly and more effective) under assumption of 80% continuing trastuzumab use.
For example, a proportion of 50% trastuzumab 'continuers' results in a cost per QALY in the range $75,000 to $105,000. PBAC · 2007
Decision context
PopulationPatients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer who have received prior therapy with anthracycline and taxane, and whose disease progresses despite trastuzumab or who meet trastuzumab-exemption criteria (early recurrence within 12 months of adjuvant trastuzumab, or CNS metastases)
Why it was knocked back
- uncertain proportion of patients continuing trastuzumab despite progression in Australian clinical practice (critical to ICER calculation), small and potentially biased Australian Oncology Monitor sample (n=51), stability and representativeness of AOM data unclear, difficulty reconciling assumption that lapatinib stops at progression while trastuzumab continues, immature overall survival data (not statistically significantly different from capecitabine monotherapy), insufficient evidence that Government savings will be realised
Submission history
| Decided | Outcome | Comparator | ICER | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2007 | Recommended | mixed comparator of five different agents weighted by usage: capecitabine monotherapy, trastuzumab monotherapy, trastuzu | $75k–105k | RCT | Single-arm | Registry · OS | PFS |
| Nov 2007 | Not recommended | mixed comparator of five agents: capecitabine monotherapy, trastuzumab monotherapy, trastuzumab + vinorelbine, trastuzum | $75k–105k | RCT · TTP |
Similar precedents
Regulatory · TGA
Label narrower than PBS population — PBAC restricts to initial treatment and includes trastuzumab-exemption criteria; TGA label requires prior trastuzumab progression only.