← The record

Lapatinib DitosylateTykerb

Noted OncologyAuthority RequiredLater-line line

Metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer in patients who have received prior therapy with an anthracycline and a taxane, and whose disease progresses despite treatment with trastuzumab or who meet trastuzumab-exemption criteria.

2
Submissions
2 resub
2007–07
On the record
$75k–105k
ICER range
2 sourced ICERs · 2007
ICER stated
Cost basis

Decisions on record

3 decisions
  • Meeting Mar 2021 Noted Metastatic breast cancer no PSD
  • Meeting Nov 2015 Recommended Metastatic (Stage IV) HER2 positive breast cancer no PSD
  • Meeting Jul 2007 Not recommended Metastatic HER2 positive breast cancer

Access path

2 submissions · public record
  1. TGA registered · Tykerb

    TGA label narrower than the PBS population

  2. Nov 2007
    Recommended

    Comparator changed: mixed comparator of five different agents weighted by usage:…

  3. Nov 2007
    Not recommended

    uncertain proportion of patients continuing trastuzumab despite progression in Australian clinical practice (critical…

RecommendedDeferredNot recommended

Cost-effectiveness

2 sourced ICERs · 2007

ICER varied widely depending on assumed extent of substitution of lapatinib for continued trastuzumab treatment; range given is for 50% trastuzumab 'continuers' scenario. ICER was dominant (less costly and more effective) under assumption of 80% continuing trastuzumab use.

For example, a proportion of 50% trastuzumab 'continuers' results in a cost per QALY in the range $75,000 to $105,000. PBAC · 2007
ICER uncertainEconomic model disputed

Decision context

PopulationPatients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer who have received prior therapy with anthracycline and taxane, and whose disease progresses despite trastuzumab or who meet trastuzumab-exemption criteria (early recurrence within 12 months of adjuvant trastuzumab, or CNS metastases)

Why it was knocked back

  • uncertain proportion of patients continuing trastuzumab despite progression in Australian clinical practice (critical to ICER calculation), small and potentially biased Australian Oncology Monitor sample (n=51), stability and representativeness of AOM data unclear, difficulty reconciling assumption that lapatinib stops at progression while trastuzumab continues, immature overall survival data (not statistically significantly different from capecitabine monotherapy), insufficient evidence that Government savings will be realised

Submission history

2 entries
DecidedOutcomeComparatorICEREvidence
Nov 2007 Recommended mixed comparator of five different agents weighted by usage: capecitabine monotherapy, trastuzumab monotherapy, trastuzu $75k–105k RCT | Single-arm | Registry · OS | PFS
Nov 2007 Not recommended mixed comparator of five agents: capecitabine monotherapy, trastuzumab monotherapy, trastuzumab + vinorelbine, trastuzum $75k–105k RCT · TTP

Similar precedents

By decision profile

Regulatory · TGA

Label narrower than PBS population — PBAC restricts to initial treatment and includes trastuzumab-exemption criteria; TGA label requires prior trastuzumab progression only.