← The record

Fluticasone Propionate With Formoterol Fumarate DihydrateFlutiform

Not recommended RespiratoryAuthority RequiredSecond-line line 💬 consumer voice

Regular maintenance treatment of asthma where the use of a combination product (an inhaled corticosteroid and a long-acting β2-agonist) is appropriate, in patients aged 12 years and over.

1
Submissions
1 resub
2018–18
On the record
ICER range
Not modelled
Cost basis

Access path

1 submission · public record
  1. TGA registered · Flutiform

    TGA label equal than the PBS population

  2. Nov 2018
    Not recommended

    PBAC reaffirmed its March 2018 recommendation to increase restriction level to Authority Required (STREAMLINED) for all…

RecommendedDeferredNot recommended

From the public summary

Verbatim · PSD text · may span indications
PBAC outcome
5.1 The PBAC did not recommend amending the current Authority Required (STREAMLINED) listing of fluticasone/formoterol to a Restricted Benefit listing. The PBAC reaffirmed its March 2018 recommendation to increase the restriction level to Authority Required (STREAMLINED) for all ICS/LABA FDC inhalers to encourage prescribers to consider first line treatment with ICS alone in asthma management.PSD · Nov 2018
5.2 The PBAC recalled that the March 2018 recommendation was made following its consideration of the findings of the Evaluation Report of the 2014 Asthma in Children Review. The PBAC did not accept the minor submissions claim that fluticasone/formoterol should not be covered by PBAC decisions from the Asthma in Children Review as it is not TGA or PBS-indicated for use in children below 12 years of age.PSD · Nov 2018
Consumer comments
4.6 The minor submission argued that fluticasone/formoterol was not included in the Terms of Reference for the Asthma in Children Review, as it is not TGA nor PBS- indicated for use in children below 12 years of age and hence should not be covered by the subsequent DUSC review or PBAC decisions that directly arise from the review.PSD · Nov 2018
4.7 The minor submission and pre-PBAC response argued the PBS listings should be separated into adult/adolescent (≥ 12 years) and children’s PBS items (4 to 12 years) where necessary and change the restriction level for items that are indicated for use in children only. The PBAC noted that term ‘children’ was used in relation to patients aged 0 to 18 years of age in the Asthma in Children Review.PSD · Nov 2018

Cost-effectiveness

Minor submission with no economic evaluation required; no ICER calculated.

Decision context

PopulationPatients aged 12 years and over with asthma not adequately controlled with maintenance ICS and inhaled short-acting β2-agonist used on an 'as required' basis.

Why it was knocked back

  • PBAC reaffirmed its March 2018 recommendation to increase restriction level to Authority Required (STREAMLINED) for all ICS/LABA FDC inhalers to encourage first-line treatment with ICS alone; sponsor's argument that fluticasone/formoterol should not be covered by Asthma in Children Review decisions was not accepted.

Submission history

1 entries
DecidedOutcomeComparatorICEREvidence
Nov 2018 Not recommended Cost-minimisation

Consumer voice

Nov 2018

No consumer comments were received for this item.

The PBAC noted that no consumer comments were received for this item. Consumer comments · PSD

Similar precedents

By decision profile

Regulatory · TGA

Label equal than PBS population — Both specify identical populations: asthma aged 12+, inadequately controlled on maintenance ICS plus SABA, requiring combination therapy.