← The record

Ertugliflozin

Recommended · restricted EndocrinologyAuthority RequiredSecond-line line

Type 2 diabetes mellitus in patients inadequately controlled with metformin or a sulfonylurea, for dual oral therapy with metformin or a sulfonylurea (15 mg strength) or as fixed-dose combination products with metformin.

2
Submissions
1 resub
2018–18
On the record
ICER range
Not modelled
Cost basis

Access path

2 submissions · public record
  1. Mar 2018
    Recommended · restricted

    vs dapagliflozin and empagliflozin (other SGLT2 inhibitors)…

  2. Jul 2018
    Recommended · restricted

    Comparator changed: dapagliflozin and empagliflozin (other SGLT2 inhibitors); for the…

  3. PBS listing · Authority Required
RecommendedDeferredNot recommended

From the public summary

Verbatim · PSD text · may span indications
PBAC outcome
6.1 The PBAC recommended the Authority Required (STREAMLINED) listing of the 15 mg dose strength ertugliflozin for dual oral therapy with metformin or a sulfonylurea, and the 7.5 mg ertugliflozin with 500 mg metformin and 7.5 mg ertugliflozin with 1 g 6PSD · Jul 2018
6.2 Following receipt of a positive TGA Delegate’s Overview, and clinical justification for accepting the higher strength of ertugliflozin, the PBAC advised of its recommendation whilst noting that there remained a limited clinical need for the higher strength products.PSD · Jul 2018
Economic analysis
6.38 The equi-effective doses were estimated as ertugliflozin 5 mg or 15 mg, once daily and dapagliflozin 10 mg or empagliflozin 10 mg or 25 mg, once daily. Estimates of equi-effectiveness were trial based. Equi-effectiveness of the comparators was derived from Therapeutic Relativity Sheets.PSD · Mar 2018
6.39 Results of the cost-minimisation analysis for ertugliflozin are presented in Table 10. 15PSD · Mar 2018
Clinical claim
6.31 The submission described ertugliflozin 5 mg and 15 mg as non-inferior in terms of effectiveness compared with dapagliflozin 10 mg or empagliflozin 10 mg or 25 mg, when used in dual oral combination with metformin for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes. The submission described ertugliflozin 5 mg and 15 mg as non-inferior in terms of safety compared to dapagliflozin or empagliflozin, when 14PSD · Mar 2018
6.32 The PBAC considered that the evidence provided in the submission did not support the clinical need for the 15 mg ertugliflozin or 7.5 mg ertugliflozin with 500 mg/1 g metformin fixed dose combinations for listing, especially given the doubt as to the non-inferior safety profile compared to their respective comparators.PSD · Mar 2018

Cost-effectiveness

This was a minor resubmission for higher strength formulations; no economic evaluation or ICER was modelled or presented.

The submission requested listing for ertugliflozin on a cost-minimisation basis to the two comparators, dapagliflozin and empagliflozin; the requested listing for ertugliflozin with metformin FDC is on a cost-minimisation basis to the individual components. PSD · 2018

Decision context

PopulationAdults with Type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled (HbA1c >7%) with metformin or a sulfonylurea, treated with ertugliflozin 15 mg in dual therapy with metformin or sulfonylurea, or with ertugliflozin 7.5 mg/metformin fixed-dose combination products.

Submission history

2 entries
DecidedOutcomeComparatorICEREvidence
Jul 2018 Recommended · restricted dapagliflozin, empagliflozin RCT · HbA1c reduction
Mar 2018 Recommended · restricted dapagliflozin and empagliflozin (other SGLT2 inhibitors); for the FDC, individual components Meta-analysis · HbA1c

Similar precedents

By decision profile

Regulatory · TGA

Label narrower than PBS population — PBAC restricts to dual therapy with metformin/sulfonylurea and inadequate control (HbA1c >7%), versus TGA's monotherapy or combination option.