← The record

EnzalutamideXtandi

Recommended OncologyAuthority RequiredFirst-line line 💬 consumer voice

Treatment of non-metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (m0HSPC) with high-risk biochemical recurrence (PSA doubling time ≤9 months) in combination with androgen deprivation therapy.

8
Submissions
4 resub
2014–26
On the record
$25k–75k
ICER range
4 sourced ICERs · 2017–2024
Redacted
Cost basis
risk sharing

Decisions on record

9 decisions
  • Meeting Mar 2026 Recommended Non-metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (nmHSPC) with biochemical recurrence at high-risk for metastasis
  • Meeting Nov 2024 Not recommended Non-metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer with high-risk biochemical recurrence
  • Meeting Mar 2023 Recommended Prostate cancer; metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC)
  • Meeting Mar 2022 Recommended Prostate cancer
  • Meeting Jul 2021 Not recommended Castration resistant prostate cancer
  • Meeting Jul 2017 Deferred Prostate cancer
  • Meeting Mar 2017 Deferred Prostate cancer
  • Meeting Nov 2015 Not recommended Metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer
1 earlier decision
  • Jul 2014 Recommended Xtandi® Astellas Pharma Australia Pty Ltd New listing (Major submission) Prostate cancer Authority required (Streamlined) listing for the treatment of patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer who have previously received docetaxel and who meet certain criteria. On the basis of i

Access path

8 submissions · public record
  1. TGA registered · Xtandi

    TGA label narrower than the PBS population

  2. Jul 2014
    Recommended · restricted

    vs abiraterone

  3. Nov 2015
    Not recommended

    Comparator changed: abiraterone → watchful waiting, abiraterone, and docetaxel

  4. Mar 2017
    Deferred

    Comparator changed: watchful waiting, abiraterone, and docetaxel → watchful waiting…

  5. Jul 2017
    Deferred

    Comparator changed: watchful waiting (active surveillance) → watchful waiting…

  6. Mar 2022
    Recommended · restricted

    Comparator changed: watchful waiting (post-docetaxel treatment continuation) →…

  7. Mar 2023
    Recommended · restricted

    Comparator changed: darolutamide → ADT alone

  8. Nov 2024
    Not recommended

    ICER dropped $75,000 → $35,000 (-53%)

  9. ↻ resubmitted
    Mar 2026
    Recommended · restricted

    Comparator changed: ADT alone (Leuprorelin + Placebo in EMBARK trial) → ADT (leuprorelin…

  10. PBS listing · Authority Required
RecommendedDeferredNot recommended

From the public summary

Verbatim · PSD text · may span indications
PBAC outcome
7.1 The PBAC recommended the PBS listing of enzalutamide, in combination with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), for the treatment of patients who have non- metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (m0HSPC) with high-risk biochemical recurrence (BCR). The PBAC considered that enzalutamide plus ADT was superior compared to the nominated comparator of ADT in terms of metastases free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS).PSD · Mar 2026
7.2 The PBAC acknowledged the input received from individuals, health care professionals and organisations in support of the resubmission, noting that the input highlighted the survival benefit associated with early treatment of prostate cancer. The PBAC also noted that enzalutamide plus ADT was the recommended treatment for m0HSPC in the NCCN and ESMO clinical guidelines.PSD · Mar 2026
Economic analysis
6.30 The resubmission presented an updated modelled economic evaluation comparing enzalutamide with ADT to ADT. At the November 2024 PBAC meeting, concerns were raised about structural uncertainties in the modelling approach, which manufactured a large treatment benefit and survival gain for enzalutamide with ADT over ADT.PSD · Mar 2026
OFFICIAL Public Summary Document - March 2026 PBAC Meeting Table 9: Key components of the economic evaluation Component November 2024 submission March 2026 resubmission Justification/comments Type of analysis Cost-utility Unchanged - Outcomes LYs, QALYs Unchanged - Time horizon 30 years vs median follow up 60.7 20 years vs median follow In EMBARK, the mean age at months in EMBARK.PSD · Mar 2026
Clinical claim
Table 1: Key components of the clinical issue addressed by the resubmission Component Description Population Non-metastatic hormone sensitive carcinoma of the prostate (m0HSPC) Intervention Enzalutamide with ADTaPSD · Mar 2026
safety profile compared to ADT. Blue shading indicates data previously seen by the PBAC. Source: Table 1.1.2, p48 of the resubmission.PSD · Mar 2026
Consumer comments
6.3 MOGA also expressed its strong support for the enzalutamide submission, categorising it as one of the therapies of “high priority for PBS listing” on the basis of the EMBARK trial. The PBAC noted that the MOGA presented a European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) for enzalutamide with or without ADT, which was limited to 3 (out of a maximum of 5, where 5 and 4 represent the grades with substantial …PSD · Nov 2024
6.4 The submission was based on one head-to-head randomised trial, EMBARK, comparing enzalutamide plus ADT and enzalutamide monotherapy to placebo plus ADT in patients with m0HSPC and high-risk BCR after prostatectomy or radiotherapy or both who were not candidates for salvage radiotherapy. ADT treatment was leuprorelin (also known as leuprolide acetate) administered as an intramuscular or subcutaneous injection.PSD · Nov 2024

Cost-effectiveness

4 sourced ICERs · 2017–2024

ICER values are redacted in the public document; economic model details are present but specific ICER figures are not stated in the publicly available text.

The PBAC deferred a recommendation on the proposal for an extended PBS listing for enzalutamide for the treatment of metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) prior to docetaxel, on the basis that the proposal to achieve a cost-effective listing was unacceptable. PBAC · 2017
ICER uncertainICER / price too highEconomic model disputed ×2Surrogate endpoint

Decision context

PopulationAdult patients with non-metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer with high-risk biochemical recurrence (PSA doubling time ≤9 months) who have undergone radical prostatectomy and/or radiation therapy, treated with enzalutamide in combination with androgen deprivation therapy.

Risk sharingRisk-sharing arrangement (RSA) proposed, which combines m0HSPC with the currently existing mHSPC restriction.

Submission history

8 entries
DecidedOutcomeComparatorICEREvidence
Mar 2026 Recommended · restricted ADT (leuprorelin + placebo) — RCT · MFS
Nov 2024 Not recommended ADT alone (Leuprorelin + Placebo in EMBARK trial) $25k–35k RCT · PFS
Mar 2023 Recommended · restricted ADT alone $55k–75k RCT · OS
Mar 2022 Recommended · restricted darolutamide — Meta-analysis · MFS
Jul 2017 Deferred watchful waiting (post-docetaxel treatment continuation) $45k–75k RCT · OS
Mar 2017 Deferred watchful waiting (active surveillance) $45k–75k RCT · PFS
Nov 2015 Not recommended watchful waiting, abiraterone, and docetaxel — RCT · OS
Jul 2014 Recommended · restricted abiraterone — RCT · OS

Clinical evidence

Trials cited in the PSDs · ClinicalTrials.gov
TrialPhaseNPrimary outcomeStatus
ARCHES Ph 3 1,150 Radiographic Progression-Free Survival (rPFS) Based on Independent Central Review (ICR) of… completed
ENZAMET Ph 3 1,125 Overall Survival Time active not recruiting
AFFIRM Ph 3 1,199 Overall Survival completed
PREVAIL Ph 3 1,717 Overall Survival completed
PROSPER Ph 3 1,401 Metastasis Free Survival (MFS) completed

Consumer voice

Mar 2023

The Medical Oncology Group of Australia expressed strong support for enzalutamide listing, categorising it as a therapy of highest priority for PBS listing based on the ARCHES and ENZEMET trials, and presented an ESMO-MCBS score of 4 out of 5.

strong support for the enzalutamide submission, categorising it as one of the therapies of "highest priority for PBS listing" Consumer comments · PSD
unmet needclinical benefitPBS access

Similar precedents

By decision profile

Regulatory · TGA

Label narrower than PBS population — PBAC restricts to m0HSPC with PSADT ≤9 months after failed primary treatment, excluding salvage radiotherapy candidates; TGA label lacks these clinical criteria.

Listed in law

Federal Register of Legislation

PBS listings commencing 1 Sep 2021 were made by these 6 determinations under the National Health Act 1953. A determination covers every listing that commenced that day, so this is the legal instrument in force for the date — not a document naming this medicine. Open it and check.

DeterminationMadeStatus
PB 87 of 2021 27 Aug 2021 Repealed PDF ↗
PB 87 of 2021 27 Aug 2021 Repealed PDF ↗
PB 88 of 2021 27 Aug 2021 Repealed PDF ↗
PB 89 of 2021 27 Aug 2021 Repealed PDF ↗
PB 89 of 2021 27 Aug 2021 Repealed PDF ↗
PB 96 of 2021 27 Aug 2021 Repealed PDF ↗