EnzalutamideXtandi
Treatment of non-metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (m0HSPC) with high-risk biochemical recurrence (PSA doubling time ≤9 months) in combination with androgen deprivation therapy.
Decisions on record
- Meeting Mar 2026 Recommended Non-metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (nmHSPC) with biochemical recurrence at high-risk for metastasis
- Meeting Nov 2024 Not recommended Non-metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer with high-risk biochemical recurrence
- Meeting Mar 2023 Recommended Prostate cancer; metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC)
- Meeting Mar 2022 Recommended Prostate cancer
- Meeting Jul 2021 Not recommended Castration resistant prostate cancer
- Meeting Jul 2017 Deferred Prostate cancer
- Meeting Mar 2017 Deferred Prostate cancer
- Meeting Nov 2015 Not recommended Metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer
1 earlier decision
- Jul 2014 Recommended Xtandi® Astellas Pharma Australia Pty Ltd New listing (Major submission) Prostate cancer Authority required (Streamlined) listing for the treatment of patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer who have previously received docetaxel and who meet certain criteria. On the basis of i
Access path
- TGA registered · Xtandi
TGA label narrower than the PBS population
- Jul 2014Recommended · restricted
vs abiraterone
- Nov 2015Not recommended
Comparator changed: abiraterone → watchful waiting, abiraterone, and docetaxel
- Mar 2017Deferred
Comparator changed: watchful waiting, abiraterone, and docetaxel → watchful waiting…
- Jul 2017Deferred
Comparator changed: watchful waiting (active surveillance) → watchful waiting…
- Mar 2022Recommended · restricted
Comparator changed: watchful waiting (post-docetaxel treatment continuation) →…
- Mar 2023Recommended · restricted
Comparator changed: darolutamide → ADT alone
- Nov 2024Not recommended
ICER dropped $75,000 → $35,000 (-53%)
- ↻ resubmittedMar 2026Recommended · restricted
Comparator changed: ADT alone (Leuprorelin + Placebo in EMBARK trial) → ADT (leuprorelin…
- PBS listing · Authority Required
From the public summary
7.1 The PBAC recommended the PBS listing of enzalutamide, in combination with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), for the treatment of patients who have non- metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (m0HSPC) with high-risk biochemical recurrence (BCR). The PBAC considered that enzalutamide plus ADT was superior compared to the nominated comparator of ADT in terms of metastases free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS).PSD · Mar 2026
7.2 The PBAC acknowledged the input received from individuals, health care professionals and organisations in support of the resubmission, noting that the input highlighted the survival benefit associated with early treatment of prostate cancer. The PBAC also noted that enzalutamide plus ADT was the recommended treatment for m0HSPC in the NCCN and ESMO clinical guidelines.PSD · Mar 2026
6.30 The resubmission presented an updated modelled economic evaluation comparing enzalutamide with ADT to ADT. At the November 2024 PBAC meeting, concerns were raised about structural uncertainties in the modelling approach, which manufactured a large treatment benefit and survival gain for enzalutamide with ADT over ADT.PSD · Mar 2026
OFFICIAL Public Summary Document - March 2026 PBAC Meeting Table 9: Key components of the economic evaluation Component November 2024 submission March 2026 resubmission Justification/comments Type of analysis Cost-utility Unchanged - Outcomes LYs, QALYs Unchanged - Time horizon 30 years vs median follow up 60.7 20 years vs median follow In EMBARK, the mean age at months in EMBARK.PSD · Mar 2026
Table 1: Key components of the clinical issue addressed by the resubmission Component Description Population Non-metastatic hormone sensitive carcinoma of the prostate (m0HSPC) Intervention Enzalutamide with ADTaPSD · Mar 2026
safety profile compared to ADT. Blue shading indicates data previously seen by the PBAC. Source: Table 1.1.2, p48 of the resubmission.PSD · Mar 2026
6.3 MOGA also expressed its strong support for the enzalutamide submission, categorising it as one of the therapies of “high priority for PBS listing” on the basis of the EMBARK trial. The PBAC noted that the MOGA presented a European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) for enzalutamide with or without ADT, which was limited to 3 (out of a maximum of 5, where 5 and 4 represent the grades with substantial …PSD · Nov 2024
6.4 The submission was based on one head-to-head randomised trial, EMBARK, comparing enzalutamide plus ADT and enzalutamide monotherapy to placebo plus ADT in patients with m0HSPC and high-risk BCR after prostatectomy or radiotherapy or both who were not candidates for salvage radiotherapy. ADT treatment was leuprorelin (also known as leuprolide acetate) administered as an intramuscular or subcutaneous injection.PSD · Nov 2024
Cost-effectiveness
ICER values are redacted in the public document; economic model details are present but specific ICER figures are not stated in the publicly available text.
The PBAC deferred a recommendation on the proposal for an extended PBS listing for enzalutamide for the treatment of metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) prior to docetaxel, on the basis that the proposal to achieve a cost-effective listing was unacceptable. PBAC · 2017
Decision context
PopulationAdult patients with non-metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer with high-risk biochemical recurrence (PSA doubling time ≤9 months) who have undergone radical prostatectomy and/or radiation therapy, treated with enzalutamide in combination with androgen deprivation therapy.
Risk sharingRisk-sharing arrangement (RSA) proposed, which combines m0HSPC with the currently existing mHSPC restriction.
Submission history
| Decided | Outcome | Comparator | ICER | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2026 | Recommended · restricted | ADT (leuprorelin + placebo) | — | RCT · MFS |
| Nov 2024 | Not recommended | ADT alone (Leuprorelin + Placebo in EMBARK trial) | $25k–35k | RCT · PFS |
| Mar 2023 | Recommended · restricted | ADT alone | $55k–75k | RCT · OS |
| Mar 2022 | Recommended · restricted | darolutamide | — | Meta-analysis · MFS |
| Jul 2017 | Deferred | watchful waiting (post-docetaxel treatment continuation) | $45k–75k | RCT · OS |
| Mar 2017 | Deferred | watchful waiting (active surveillance) | $45k–75k | RCT · PFS |
| Nov 2015 | Not recommended | watchful waiting, abiraterone, and docetaxel | — | RCT · OS |
| Jul 2014 | Recommended · restricted | abiraterone | — | RCT · OS |
Clinical evidence
| Trial | Phase | N | Primary outcome | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARCHES | Ph 3 | 1,150 | Radiographic Progression-Free Survival (rPFS) Based on Independent Central Review (ICR) of… | completed |
| ENZAMET | Ph 3 | 1,125 | Overall Survival Time | active not recruiting |
| AFFIRM | Ph 3 | 1,199 | Overall Survival | completed |
| PREVAIL | Ph 3 | 1,717 | Overall Survival | completed |
| PROSPER | Ph 3 | 1,401 | Metastasis Free Survival (MFS) | completed |
Consumer voice
The Medical Oncology Group of Australia expressed strong support for enzalutamide listing, categorising it as a therapy of highest priority for PBS listing based on the ARCHES and ENZEMET trials, and presented an ESMO-MCBS score of 4 out of 5.
strong support for the enzalutamide submission, categorising it as one of the therapies of "highest priority for PBS listing" Consumer comments · PSD
Similar precedents
Regulatory · TGA
Label narrower than PBS population — PBAC restricts to m0HSPC with PSADT ≤9 months after failed primary treatment, excluding salvage radiotherapy candidates; TGA label lacks these clinical criteria.
Listed in law
PBS listings commencing 1 Sep 2021 were made by these 6 determinations under the National Health Act 1953. A determination covers every listing that commenced that day, so this is the legal instrument in force for the date — not a document naming this medicine. Open it and check.
| Determination | Made | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB 87 of 2021 | 27 Aug 2021 | Repealed | PDF ↗ |
| PB 87 of 2021 | 27 Aug 2021 | Repealed | PDF ↗ |
| PB 88 of 2021 | 27 Aug 2021 | Repealed | PDF ↗ |
| PB 89 of 2021 | 27 Aug 2021 | Repealed | PDF ↗ |
| PB 89 of 2021 | 27 Aug 2021 | Repealed | PDF ↗ |
| PB 96 of 2021 | 27 Aug 2021 | Repealed | PDF ↗ |