← The record

Abiraterone Acetate And MethylprednisoloneYONSA MPRED

Recommended OncologyAuthority RequiredFirst-line line 💬 consumer voice

Metastatic castration-sensitive (hormone-sensitive) prostate cancer in combination with androgen deprivation therapy, for treatment initiation within 6 months of commencing ADT.

3
Submissions
2 resub
2022–23
On the record
ICER range
Cost-min
Cost basis
risk sharing

Decisions on record

3 decisions
  • Meeting Jul 2023 Recommended Metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer
  • Meeting Nov 2022 Recommended Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
  • Meeting Mar 2022 Not recommended Metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer

Access path

3 submissions · public record
  1. TGA registered · YONSA MPRED

    TGA label narrower than the PBS population

  2. Mar 2022
    Not recommended

    vs originator abiraterone acetate (OAA) 1000 mg once daily…

  3. ↻ resubmitted
    Nov 2022
    Recommended · restricted

    Comparator changed: originator abiraterone acetate (OAA) 1000 mg once daily with…

  4. Jul 2023
    Recommended

    Comparator changed: originator abiraterone acetate (OAA) 1000 mg once daily with…

  5. PBS listing · Authority Required
RecommendedDeferredNot recommended

From the public summary

Verbatim · PSD text · may span indications
PBAC outcome
7.1 The PBAC recommended the listing of the composite pack of abiraterone acetate and methylprednisolone (SAA+MPRED) tablets for the treatment of metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) on a CMA versus apalutamide.PSD · Jul 2023
7.2 The PBAC noted the input from the Medical Oncology Group of Australia (MOGA) which strongly supported the listing of SAA+MPRED on the PBS for the treatment of mHSPC.PSD · Jul 2023
Economic analysis
6.27 The submission presented a CMA to compare costs of treatment with SAA+MPRED to apalutamide (see Table 7).PSD · Jul 2023
6.28 Based on the established bioequivalence to OAA+P the submission proposed SAA 500 mg + MPRED 4 mg daily to be equi-effective to apalutamide 240 mg once daily.PSD · Jul 2023
Clinical claim
6.24 Based on i) indirectly comparable evidence presented for OAA+P + ADT and apalutamide + ADT via ADT as common comparator, and ii) assuming bioequivalence of OAA+P + ADT and SAA+MPRED + ADT, the submission described SAA+MPRED + ADT as non-inferior in terms of effectiveness compared with apalutamide + ADT and inferior in terms of safety. The ESC considered that these claims were reasonable. The results of ITCs showed that OAA+P + ADT vs.PSD · Jul 2023
6.25 The PBAC considered that the claim of non-inferior comparative effectiveness was reasonable. 17PSD · Jul 2023
Consumer comments
6.2 The PBAC noted and welcomed the input from The Medical Oncology Group of Australia (MOGA) via the Consumer Comments facility on the PBS website. The MOGA expressed its strong support for the abiraterone and methylprednisolone submission, categorising it as one of the therapies of “highest priority for PBS listing”.PSD · Jul 2023
Financial management – risk sharing
6.43 The submission stated that the Sponsor expects to join the same RSA as apalutamide for use beyond the annual subsidisation caps upon listing. For apalutamide, the PBAC considered that a RSA with a rebate for use beyond annual subsidisation caps, which were based on the estimated PBS/RPBS expenditure would be reasonable to mitigate the risk that patients would remain on apalutamide for longer than estimated from the TITAN trial and the risk that use …PSD · Jul 2023

Cost-effectiveness

Cost-minimisation analysis; no ICER calculated by design.

The ESC considered for the purpose of Section 101(3B) of the National Health Act 1953, that SAA+MPRED was an alternative therapy to apalutamide, enzalutamide and darolutamide for the treatment of mHSPC, and that SAA+MPRED does not provide a significant improvement in efficacy over these drugs. PSD · 2023
Cost-effectiveness accepted ×2

Decision context

PopulationPatients with newly diagnosed metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer in combination with androgen deprivation therapy, treatment initiated within 6 months of commencing ADT.

Risk sharingSponsor expects to join the same risk sharing arrangement (RSA) as apalutamide upon listing.

Submission history

3 entries
DecidedOutcomeComparatorICEREvidence
Jul 2023 Recommended apalutamide RCT · OS
Nov 2022 Recommended · restricted originator abiraterone acetate (OAA) 1000 mg once daily with prednisone 5 mg twice daily RCT · Surrogate
Mar 2022 Not recommended originator abiraterone acetate (OAA) 1000 mg once daily with concomitant prednisolone (PRED) 5 mg twice daily RCT · Surrogate

Clinical evidence

Trials cited in the PSDs · ClinicalTrials.gov
TrialPhaseNPrimary outcomeStatus
STAMPEDE Ph 2, PHASE3 11,992 Overall survival active not recruiting
PEACE-1 Ph 1, PHASE2 12 PSA response completed
STAAR Ph 2 53 Testosterone Levels completed
Study 301 (COU-AA-301) Ph 3 1,195 Overall Survival completed
Study 302 (COU-AA-302) Ph 3 1,088 Overall Survival completed

Consumer voice

Jul 2023

The Medical Oncology Group of Australia (MOGA) expressed strong support for abiraterone and methylprednisolone submission, categorising it as a therapy of highest priority for PBS listing, and presented an ESMO-MCBS score of 4 out of 5.

The MOGA expressed its strong support for the abiraterone and methylprednisolone submission, categorising it as one of the therapies of "highest priority for PBS listing". Consumer comments · PSD
unmet needclinical benefitpriority access

Similar precedents

By decision profile

Regulatory · TGA

Label narrower than PBS population — PBAC restricts to treatment initiation within 6 months of ADT commencement; TGA label has no timing requirement.