← The record

EliglustatCerdelga

Not recommended MetabolicRestrictedFirst-line line

Treatment of Gaucher disease type 1 (GD1) in adult patients aged ≥18 years with at least one GD1-related disease manifestation (skeletal disease, haematological complications, or gastrointestinal complications due to enlarged liver or spleen).

1
Submissions
2015–15
On the record
ICER range
Cost-min
Cost basis

Decision on record

1 decision
  • Meeting Jul 2015 Not recommended Gaucher Disease

Access path

1 submission · public record
  1. TGA registered · Cerdelga

    TGA label narrower than the PBS population

  2. Jul 2015
    Not recommended

    vs enzyme replacement therapy (imiglucerase or…

RecommendedDeferredNot recommended

From the public summary

Verbatim · PSD text · may span indications
PBAC outcome
7.1 The PBAC rejected the request to list eliglustat on the PBS for the treatment of Gaucher Disease type 1 on the basis that the results of the direct randomised trial (ENCORE) suggested inferiority, and that clinically important inferiority could not be excluded with confidence. 13PSD · Jul 2015
7.2 The PBAC accepted that the nominated comparators, imiglucerase and velaglucerase-alfa, were appropriate.PSD · Jul 2015
Economic analysis
6.27 A cost-minimisation analysis against imiglucerase (as a representative for ERT) was presented by the submission.PSD · Jul 2015
6.28 The equi-effective doses were estimated as ERT (imiglucerase or velaglucerase-alfa)PSD · Jul 2015
Clinical claim
6.24 The submission described eliglustat as non-inferior in terms of comparative effectiveness and non-inferior in terms of comparative safety over imiglucerase.PSD · Jul 2015
These claims were not adequately supported as:  The definition of a “stable” response in ENCORE was broader and more relaxed compared to Kishnani et al 2009 and the non-inferiority margin of 25% assumed that eliglustat is 10% worse than imiglucerase, which may not be reasonable for a non-inferiority claim as no reasonable justification for a MCID was provided in either the submission or the PSCR.PSD · Jul 2015

Cost-effectiveness

Cost-minimisation analysis; no ICER calculated as this was a cost-minimisation comparison against ERT.

Decision context

PopulationAdults aged ≥18 years with confirmed diagnosis of Gaucher disease type 1 and at least one GD1-related disease manifestation (splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, anaemia, thrombocytopenia, or skeletal disease) who are CYP2D6 poor, intermediate or extensive metabolisers.

Submission history

1 entries
DecidedOutcomeComparatorICEREvidence
Jul 2015 Not recommended enzyme replacement therapy (imiglucerase or velaglucerase-alfa) RCT · Maintenance of response in composite outcome (haemoglobin level, platelet count, spleen volume and liver volume)

Clinical evidence

Trials cited in the PSDs · ClinicalTrials.gov
TrialPhaseNPrimary outcomeStatus
ENCORE Ph 3 160 Percentage of Participants Who Remained Stable for 52 Weeks During the Primary Analysis Pe… completed

Similar precedents

By decision profile

Regulatory · TGA

Label narrower than PBS population — PBAC restricts to patients with documented GD1-related manifestations and specific CYP2D6 metaboliser status; TGA label applies to all adult GD1 patients.