← The record

Dorzolamide With TimololCosdor

Recommended OphthalmologyRestricted

Treatment of elevated intraocular pressure in patients with ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma when concomitant therapy is appropriate.

1
Submissions
2022–22
On the record
ICER range
Not modelled
Cost basis

Decision on record

1 decision
  • Meeting Mar 2022 Recommended Elevated intra-ocular pressure

Access path

1 submission · public record
  1. TGA registered · Cosdor

    TGA label narrower than the PBS population

  2. Mar 2022
    Recommended

    vs Cosopt

  3. PBS listing · Restricted
RecommendedDeferredNot recommended

From the public summary

Verbatim · PSD text · may span indications
PBAC outcome
6.1 The PBAC recommended the listing of a new ophthalmic eye drops solution in a preservative-free (PF) multi-dose bottle, Vizo-PF Dorzolatim, under the same circumstances as the currently listed brands of dorzolamide + timolol eye drops (Cosopt and Cosdor), for the treatment of elevated intraocular pressure in patients with ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma when concomitant therapy is appropriate.PSD · Mar 2022
6.3 The PBAC noted that the TGA stated that Vizo-PF Dorzolatim is bioequivalent to both the preservative-containing and PF forms of Cosopt. The PBAC advised, under section 101(4AACD) of the National Health Act 1953, that the Vizo-PF Dorzolatim, Cosopt and Cosdor brands of dorzolamide + timolol eye drops should be considered equivalent for the purposes of substitution (i.e. ‘a’-flagged in the Schedule).PSD · Mar 2022
Consumer comments
5.2 The PBAC noted that this item received no consumer comment. Pricing considerationPSD · Mar 2022

Cost-effectiveness

This is a Committee Secretariat submission for a bioequivalent formulation (preservative-free multi-dose bottle). No economic evaluation was conducted; the submission estimated no financial implications to PBS/RPBS.

The PBAC advised that because Vizo-PF Dorzolatim is not expected to provide a substantial and clinically relevant improvement in efficacy, or reduction of toxicity, over Cosopt and Cosdor, or not expected to address a high and urgent unmet clinical need given the presence of alternative therapies, the criteria prescribed by the National Health (Pharmaceuticals and Vaccines – Cost Recovery) Regulations 2009 for Pricing Pathway A were not met. PBAC · 2022

Decision context

PopulationPatients with elevated intraocular pressure due to ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma whose condition is inadequately controlled with monotherapy.

Submission history

1 entries
DecidedOutcomeComparatorICEREvidence
Mar 2022 Recommended Cosopt Cost-minimisation · Cost-minimisation

Similar precedents

By decision profile

Regulatory · TGA

Label narrower than PBS population — PBAC restricts to patients with inadequate monotherapy control, versus TGA's broader label allowing concomitant therapy without prior monotherapy requirement.