← The record

BimatoprostBimatoprost Sandoz

Noted OphthalmologyUnrestrictedFirst-line line

For the reduction of elevated intraocular pressure, or open angle glaucoma, as first line therapy or monotherapy or as adjunctive therapy to topical beta-blockers.

1
Submissions
2020–20
On the record
ICER range
Cost-min
Cost basis

Decisions on record

5 decisions
  • Meeting Jul 2022 Noted Elevated intraocular pressure or open angle glaucoma no PSD
  • Meeting Jul 2020 Recommended Reduction of elevated intraocular pressure or open angle glaucoma, as first-line therapy or monotherapy or as adjunctive therapy to topical beta-blockers.
  • Meeting Mar 2014 Recommended Ganfort PF® Allergan Australia Pty Ltd Glaucoma To request listing of a new preservative free formulation as a restricted benefit within the general and optometrist schedules for the treatment of glaucoma. In making this recommendation, the PBAC noted it could only recommend listing of bimatoprost + no PSD
  • Meeting Nov 2013 Recommended 0.03% eye drops, preservative free, 30 x 0.4 mL unit doses Lumigan® PF Allergan Pty Ltd Minor submission Glaucoma Unrestricted benefit listing within the General Schedule and Optometrist Schedule of a preservative free, unit dose presentation of bimatoprost eye drops In making this recommendation, t no PSD
  • Meeting Sep 2002 Recommended An eye drop for glaucoma no PSD

Access path

1 submission · public record
  1. TGA registered · Bimatoprost Sandoz

    TGA label equal than the PBS population

  2. Jul 2020
    Recommended

    vs latanoprost (lowest priced alternative agent)

  3. PBS listing · Unrestricted
RecommendedDeferredNot recommended

From the public summary

Verbatim · PSD text · may span indications
PBAC outcome
6.1 The PBAC recommended the listing of a new form of bimatoprost 300 microgram per mL eye drops (Vizo-PF Bimatoprost) in a preservative-free multi-dose bottle as an unrestricted benefit on a cost minimisation basis against the lowest priced alternative agent (latanoprost).PSD · Jul 2020
6.2 Vizo-PF Bimatoprost is considered bioequivalent to the PBS-listed Lumigan PF by the TGA. While the minor submission nominated Lumigan PF as the main comparator, the 6PSD · Jul 2020
Economic analysis
5.7 The minor submission presented a cost-minimisation analysis of Vizo-PF Bimatoprost compared with Lumigan PF. The equi-effective doses were estimated as Vizo-PF Bimatoprost one drop per eye per day and Lumigan PF one drop per eye (one ampoule) per day.PSD · Jul 2020
5.8 The proposed ex-manufacturer price (AEMP) for one 3 mL bottle of Vizo-PF Bimatoprost is $'''''''''' (cost per treatment per pack $'''''''''''' x 28 (total number of treatment both eyes per pack)). The proposed price of Vizo-PF Bimatoprost, as requested by the Sponsor, and the price of the comparator are presented in Table 2.PSD · Jul 2020
Clinical claim
5.3 The TGA considered that Vizo-PF Bimatoprost is bioequivalent to Lumigan PF. Vizo-PF Bimatoprost and Lumigan PF are both preservative-free, with the only difference being Vizo-PF Bimatoprost comes in a multi-dose bottle compared to single dose ampoules for Lumigan PF.PSD · Jul 2020
5.4 The submission claimed Vizo-PF Bimatoprost is non-inferior and equivalent to eye drops containing bimatoprost with preservative (Lumigan) in its ability to reduce intraocular pressure, with a similar safety profile. The submission did not define Lumigan (with preservative) as a relevant comparator, nor did it present evidence to support this claim, but provided a reference to a published study.1PSD · Jul 2020

Cost-effectiveness

Cost-minimisation analysis; no ICER calculated. All pricing and financial data are redacted (marked with quotation marks in the document).

Cost-effectiveness accepted

Decision context

PopulationPatients requiring treatment for elevated intraocular pressure or open angle glaucoma, suitable for first-line therapy, monotherapy, or adjunctive therapy to topical beta-blockers.

Submission history

1 entries
DecidedOutcomeComparatorICEREvidence
Jul 2020 Recommended latanoprost (lowest priced alternative agent) Cost-minimisation · Cost-minimisation

Similar precedents

By decision profile

Regulatory · TGA

Label equal than PBS population — Both texts specify identical indications: elevated intraocular pressure or open angle glaucoma as first-line, monotherapy, or adjunctive therapy.