← The record

AmivantamabRYBREVANT

Recommended OncologyAuthority RequiredLater-line line 💬 consumer voice

Treatment of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutated (EGFRm) locally advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) where the condition has progressed on or after osimertinib, in combination with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy.

2
Submissions
1 resub
2024–26
On the record
$75k–255k
ICER range
2 sourced ICERs · 2024–2026
Redacted
Cost basis
risk sharing

Decisions on record

2 decisions
  • Meeting Mar 2026 Recommended Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutation, locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with EGFR mutation with disease progression after osimertinib
  • Meeting Nov 2024 Recommended Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation

Access path

2 submissions · public record
  1. TGA registered · RYBREVANT

    TGA label narrower than the PBS population

  2. Nov 2024
    Recommended

    vs platinum-based chemotherapy (carboplatin and pemetrexed)

  3. Mar 2026
    Recommended · restricted

    ICER rose $95,000 → $255,000 (+168%)

  4. PBS listing · Authority Required
RecommendedDeferredNot recommended

From the public summary

Verbatim · PSD text · may span indications
PBAC outcome
7.1 The PBAC recommended the listing of amivantamab, in combination with platinum- based doublet chemotherapy (PDC), for the treatment of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutated (EGFRm) locally advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), where the condition has progressed on or after osimertinib, on the basis that it should be available only under special arrangements under Section 100 - Efficient Funding of Chemotherapy …PSD · Mar 2026
OFFICIAL Public Summary Document - March 2026 PBAC Meeting considered the estimated number of eligible patients presented in the submission was reasonable, but uptake was substantially overestimated.PSD · Mar 2026
Economic analysis
6.41 The submission presented a modelled cost utility analysis (CUA) using a three-state partitioned survival model over a seven-year time horizon, comparing AmiCP with CP.PSD · Mar 2026
Additionally, the same model was used to generate an ICER for AmiCP vs ABCP. The base case ICER in the submission was calculated as a weighted ICER applying aPSD · Mar 2026
Clinical claim
6.36 The submission claimed AmiCP is superior in terms of effectiveness compared with CP.PSD · Mar 2026
The ESC considered this claim is adequately supported based on the statistically significant difference in PFS (HR=0.48; 95% CI: 0.36, 0.64; p<0.0001), OS (HR=0.73; 95% CI: 0.54, 0.99; p=0.0386), ORR (OR=3.1; 95% CI: 2.00, 4.80; p<0.0001) and icPFS (HR=0.65; 95% CI: 0.49, 0.84; nominal p=0.0012) for AmiCP compared to CP presented in the MARIPOSA-2 trial.PSD · Mar 2026
Consumer comments
6.3 The PBAC noted the advice received from the Rare Cancers Australia, Lung Foundation Australia and the International Cancer Advocacy Network’s Exon 20 Group supported the PBS listing of amivantamab for the treatment of patients with EGFR ex20ins mutation positive locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC.PSD · Nov 2024
6.4 The organisations noted that patients with EGFR ex20ins mutation positive NSCLC currently face particularly low survival rates and have limited treatment options, creating a significant burden for patients and their carers and relatives.PSD · Nov 2024

Cost-effectiveness

2 sourced ICERs · 2024–2026

ICER value redacted; document states 'redacted content' in economic sections

Decision context

PopulationAdult patients with EGFRm locally advanced/metastatic (Stage IIIB-IV) NSCLC whose disease has progressed on or after osimertinib monotherapy in the advanced/metastatic setting, with WHO performance status ≤2

Risk sharingSpecial pricing arrangement applies; effective approved ex-manufacturer price (AEMP) per 350 mg vial is redacted

Submission history

2 entries
DecidedOutcomeComparatorICEREvidence
Mar 2026 Recommended · restricted platinum-based doublet chemotherapy (PDC) and atezolizumab + bevacizumab + carboplatin + paclitaxel (ABCP) $155k–255k RCT · PFS
Nov 2024 Recommended platinum-based chemotherapy (carboplatin and pemetrexed) $75k–95k RCT · PFS

Clinical evidence

Trials cited in the PSDs · ClinicalTrials.gov
TrialPhaseNPrimary outcomeStatus
PAPILLON Ph 3 308 Progression-Free Survival (PFS) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors … active not recruiting

Consumer voice

Nov 2024

Consumer input from patients, healthcare professionals and advocacy organisations supported PBS listing of amivantamab for EGFR ex20ins mutation positive NSCLC, noting limited treatment options, low survival rates, clinically meaningful benefit from increased PFS, manageable side effects, and substantial financial pressures faced by patients.

patients with EGFR ex20ins mutation positive NSCLC currently face particularly low survival rates and have limited treatment options, creating a significant burden for patients and their carers and relatives. Consumer comments · PSD
unmet needsurvival benefittreatment optionsside effectsout-of-pocket costtreatment burden on family

Similar precedents

By decision profile

Regulatory · TGA

Label narrower than PBS population — PBAC restricts to WHO performance status ≤2; TGA label lacks this performance status requirement.

Listed in law

Federal Register of Legislation

PBS listings commencing 1 May 2025 were made by these 3 determinations under the National Health Act 1953. A determination covers every listing that commenced that day, so this is the legal instrument in force for the date — not a document naming this medicine. Open it and check.

DeterminationMadeStatus
PB 40 of 2025 28 Apr 2025 Repealed PDF ↗
PB 41 of 2025 28 Apr 2025 Repealed PDF ↗
PB 42 of 2025 28 Apr 2025 Repealed PDF ↗