← The record

Alirocumab

Noted CardiovascularAuthority Required 💬 consumer voice

Treatment of familial heterozygous hypercholesterolaemia (he-FH) and non-familial hypercholesterolaemia (non-FH), and prevention of cardiovascular events.

4
Submissions
3 resub
2017–23
On the record
ICER range
Cost-min
Cost basis
risk sharing

Decisions on record

6 decisions
  • Meeting Mar 2025 Noted Familial and non-familial hypercholesterolaemia no PSD
  • Meeting Mar 2023 Recommended Familial heterozygous hypercholesterolaemia (he-FH) and non-familial hypercholesterolaemia (non-FH)
  • Meeting Nov 2022 Withdrawn Hypercholesterolaemia no PSD
  • Meeting Mar 2020 Recommended Hypercholesterolaemia
  • Meeting Mar 2019 Recommended Hypercholesterolaemia
  • Meeting Nov 2017 Not recommended Familial hypercholesterolaemia and clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

Access path

4 submissions · public record
  1. Nov 2017
    Not recommended

    Inadequate clinical evidence of cardiovascular outcomes (primary endpoints are LDL-c reduction only; ODYSSEY OUTCOMES…

  2. ↻ resubmitted
    Mar 2019
    Recommended · restricted

    Comparator changed: ezetimibe and placebo → evolocumab (for he-FH); placebo (for non-FH…

  3. Mar 2020
    Recommended · restricted

    Comparator changed: evolocumab (for he-FH); placebo (for non-FH and diabetes mellitus…

  4. Mar 2023
    Recommended

    Comparator changed: evolocumab → alirocumab 150 mg in 1 mL pre-filled pen

  5. PBS listing · Authority Required
RecommendedDeferredNot recommended

From the public summary

Verbatim · PSD text · may span indications
PBAC outcome
6.1 The PBAC recommended the listing of alirocumab AI under the same circumstances as alirocumab PFP. 5PSD · Mar 2023
6.2 The PBAC noted the sponsor’s view that the appropriate main comparator for alirocumab is two pens of alirocumab 150 mg in 1 mL PFP devices. The PBAC agreed that alirocumab PFP was an appropriate comparator and also considered that evolocumab was also a relevant comparator.PSD · Mar 2023
Economic analysis
5.7 The submission presented a cost-minimisation analysis of alirocumab AI compared with alirocumab PFP for the respective indications at the published dispensed price per maximum quantity (DPMQ) (Table 3). It was assumed that there would be no differences in setting of care, utilisation adherence, persistence, effectiveness, safety or use of other healthcare resources between these strengths or devices of alirocumab.PSD · Mar 2023
Table 3: Cost-minimisation analysis presented by the submission Treatment regimen Published DPMQ (23 October 2022) (Initial and continuing 1 x 300 mg/2 mL device (proposed) 2 x 150 mg/1 mL devices (current) treatment) 300 mg SC Q4W $498.31 $498.31PSD · Mar 2023
Clinical claim
5.3 The submission claimed non-inferior comparative effectiveness and safety of alirocumab AI compared with alirocumab PFP.PSD · Mar 2023
5.4 The TGA Delegate confirmed that alirocumab AI is bioequivalent to the registered alirocumab PFP. The Delegate noted that alirocumab AI may provide a benefit for the patient by providing an option to administer a single injection for a monthly dose of 300 mg of alirocumab. The Delegate noted the human factor data suggests a comparable useability between the two devices.PSD · Mar 2023
Consumer comments
5.2 The PBAC noted and welcomed input from health care professionals (5) via the Consumer Comments facility on the PBS website. The comments described a range of benefits associated with alirocumab AI, including fewer side effects due to decreased injection frequency and easier and more convenient administration compared to alirocumab PFP. 3PSD · Mar 2023
Financial management – risk sharing
6.96 The resubmission stated that the sponsor was willing to undertake a risk sharing arrangement, but did not provide any details regarding the arrangement. For more detail on PBAC’s view, see section 7 PBAC outcome.PSD · Mar 2019

Cost-effectiveness

Cost-minimisation analysis; no ICER calculated as submission demonstrated equi-effectiveness at the same cost.

ICER uncertainICER / price too highCost-effectiveness accepted ×2

Decision context

PopulationPatients with familial heterozygous hypercholesterolaemia (he-FH) and non-familial hypercholesterolaemia (non-FH) with high or very high cardiovascular risk and hypercholesterolaemia not adequately controlled with their lipid-modifying therapy.

Risk sharingExisting Deed of Agreement in place for alirocumab; AI form will be subject to the same Deed arrangements.

Submission history

4 entries
DecidedOutcomeComparatorICEREvidence
Mar 2023 Recommended alirocumab 150 mg in 1 mL pre-filled pen Single-arm · Bioequivalence
Mar 2020 Recommended · restricted evolocumab Cost-minimisation · Cost-minimisation
Mar 2019 Recommended · restricted evolocumab (for he-FH); placebo (for non-FH and diabetes mellitus, post ACS) RCT · LDL reduction; cardiovascular outcomes (ODYSSEY OUTCOMES)
Nov 2017 Not recommended ezetimibe and placebo Meta-analysis · LDL-C

Consumer voice

Mar 2023

Healthcare professionals provided input describing benefits of alirocumab AI including fewer side effects due to decreased injection frequency and easier, more convenient administration compared to alirocumab PFP.

The comments described a range of benefits associated with alirocumab AI, including fewer side effects due to decreased injection frequency and easier and more convenient administration compared to alirocumab PFP. Consumer comments · PSD
side effectstreatment burdenconvenience

Similar precedents

By decision profile

Regulatory · TGA

Label narrower than PBS population — PBAC restricts to patients with high/very high cardiovascular risk and inadequate control despite current lipid-modifying therapy.