Alefacept
Treatment of severe chronic plaque psoriasis in adult patients with PASI score ≥15 who are refractory, intolerant or contraindicated to currently available therapies.
Decision on record
- Meeting Jul 2004 Not recommended Used for the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis no PSD
Access path
- Nov 2005Not recommended
unacceptable and uncertain cost-effectiveness, base-case ICER numerically higher than best-case scenario from previous…
- Nov 2005Not recommended
unacceptable and uncertain cost-effectiveness, base-case incremental cost per extra QALY gained numerically higher than…
Cost-effectiveness
The PBAC recalled that it had judged the base-case incremental cost per extra QALY gained in the previous submission, to be unacceptably high. PBAC · 2005
Decision context
PopulationAdult patients with severe chronic plaque psoriasis (PASI score ≥15) who are refractory, intolerant or contraindicated to at least two of the following: phototherapy, cyclosporin, or methotrexate.
Why it was knocked back
- unacceptable and uncertain cost-effectiveness, base-case incremental cost per extra QALY gained numerically higher than best-case scenario in previous submission, model made series of favourable assumptions about alefacept, omitted re-initiation of treatment option
Submission history
| Decided | Outcome | Comparator | ICER | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2005 | Not recommended | placebo | $45k–75k | RCT · PASI-50 |
| Nov 2005 | Not recommended | placebo | $45k–75k | RCT · PASI-50 |
Similar precedents
Regulatory · TGA
Label narrower than PBS population — PBAC restricts to severe psoriasis (PASI ≥15) with prior treatment failure/intolerance/contraindication; TGA label includes moderate-to-severe without these requirements.