organ transplant rejection prophylaxis
Immunology · 2015–2015
No submission for this condition has carried consumer input, including the one made since the comments facility came into use.
Every decision
| Medicine | Meeting | Outcome | Consumer input |
|---|---|---|---|
| everolimus Prophylaxis of organ rejection in adult patients at mild to moderate immunological risk receiving an allogeneic renal, cardiac, or hepatic transplant. | Nov 2015 | Not recommended | none received |
What the PBS pays
$23M in government benefit over 2024–25, across 24,537 services.
This is spend on the medicines considered for this condition, not spend on the disease. A medicine used for several conditions is counted in full under each, so figures across conditions add to more than national PBS expenditure.
| Medicine | Government benefit |
|---|---|
| everolimus | $23M |
Registered, not subsidised
Medicines on the ARTG for this condition with no PBAC record at all. Registration and subsidy are separate decisions: a medicine can be legally available in Australia and never have been put to the committee.
| Medicine | On the ARTG since | Registrations |
|---|---|---|
| azathioprineAPO-AZATHIOPRINE azathioprine 25 mg tablet blister pack | 1991 | 26 |
The ARTG export holds current registrations only, so the year is the earliest entry still on the register rather than a first-registration date. The condition here comes from the registered label, which is usually broader than the population a sponsor asks to have subsidised.
Conditions are classified by a language model from the indication text of each submission, so an individual label here can be wrong. Consumer input is read from the document's own consumer comments section: 0 of 1 decisions since 2014 carried some. Silence means no comment reached the committee through that facility, not that nobody was affected. More on how this was built.