← The record

VemurafenibZelboraf

Recommended OncologyAuthority RequiredFirst-line line

Treatment of BRAF V600 mutation-positive patients with unresectable (stage IIIC) or metastatic (stage IV) melanoma with WHO performance status ≤2.

3
Submissions
1 resub
2012–13
On the record
$75k–200k
ICER range
3 sourced ICERs · 2012–2013
ICER stated
Cost basis
risk sharing

Decisions on record

2 decisions
  • Meeting Apr 2017 Recommended Unresectable Stage III or Stage IV malignant melanoma no PSD
  • Meeting Jul 2012 Deferred Melanoma

Access path

3 submissions · public record
  1. TGA registered · Zelboraf

    TGA label narrower than the PBS population

  2. Jul 2012
    Deferred

    vs dacarbazine

  3. Jul 2012
    Deferred
  4. Mar 2013
    Recommended

    ICER dropped $200,000 → $105,000 (-48%)

  5. PBS listing · Authority Required
RecommendedDeferredNot recommended

Cost-effectiveness

3 sourced ICERs · 2012–2013

Base case ICER range of $75,000–$105,000 per QALY (without non-health care costs). With rebate and non-health care costs included, ICER was $45,000–$75,000, but PBAC noted inclusion of non-health care costs in base case was inconsistent with PBAC guidelines.

The PBAC noted that the inclusion of non-health care cost in the base case analysis rather than supplementary analysis was inconsistent with the PBAC guidelines. PBAC · 2013
Economic model disputed

Decision context

PopulationPreviously untreated patients with unresectable stage IIIC or stage IV (metastatic) melanoma positive for BRAF V600 mutation, with WHO performance status ≤2.

Risk sharingRisk share arrangement proposed to reduce estimated net cost to PBS; arrangement intended to verify anticipated overall survival benefits and manage risk of continued therapy beyond disease progression.

Why it was knocked back

  • ICER unacceptably high and uncertain ($75,000–$105,000 per QALY without non-health care costs); uncertainty regarding BRAF test accuracy and false positives reducing cost-effectiveness; limited evidence for non-V600E mutations (27% of eligible population); modelled overall survival gain likely overestimated compared to trial results; unresolved discrepancies in utilisation and cost estimates across BRAF inhibitor submissions; need for clarification on MBS/PBS costs of BRAF testing.

Submission history

3 entries
DecidedOutcomeComparatorICEREvidence
Mar 2013 Recommended dacarbazine (DTIC) $75k–105k RCT · OS
Jul 2012 Deferred dacarbazine $105k–200k RCT · OS, PFS
Jul 2012 Deferred dacarbazine $105k–200k RCT · OS

Clinical evidence

Trials cited in the PSDs · ClinicalTrials.gov
TrialPhaseNPrimary outcomeStatus
BRIM 3 Ph 3 675 Overall Survival completed

Codependent tests

MSAC
ServiceBiomarkerMSAC outcomeYear
BRAF V600 Genetic Testing in melanoma BRAF V600 mutation (V600E or V600K) supported with conditions 2012
BRAF V600 mutation testing in melanoma BRAF V600 mutation status deferred 2013
BRAF mutation test for metastatic melanoma BRAF V600 mutation supported 2018

Similar precedents

By decision profile

Regulatory · TGA

Label narrower than PBS population — PBAC restricts to WHO performance status ≤2 and first-line treatment; TGA label has no performance status or line-of-therapy restrictions.