← The record

Trandolapril With VerapamilTarka

Not recommended CardiovascularRestricted

the treatment of hypertension. Treatment should not be initiated with this fixed dose combination.

1
Submissions
2005–05
On the record
ICER range
Cost-min
Cost basis

Decision on record

1 decision
  • Meeting Nov 2007 Not recommended Anti-hypertensive no PSD

Access path

1 submission · public record
  1. TGA registered · Tarka

    TGA label equal than the PBS population

  2. Nov 2005
    Not recommended

    Lack of clinical need in patients with hypertension for the combination, concerns about inappropriate substitution for…

RecommendedDeferredNot recommended

Cost-effectiveness

Cost-minimisation approach adopted; no ICER calculated as only drug costs were included in the preliminary economic evaluation.

Decision context

Populationpatients with hypertension who are not being treated with this fixed dose combination

Why it was knocked back

  • Lack of clinical need in patients with hypertension for the combination, concerns about inappropriate substitution for ACE inhibitor with thiazide combinations, unconvincing evidence of superiority over individual components in the requested doses, verapamil not a drug of choice in hypertension treatment, unclear clinical need given small number of patients on concomitant therapy, potential for use beyond requested restriction (hypertension and angina) without evidence of additive effect

Submission history

1 entries
DecidedOutcomeComparatorICEREvidence
Nov 2005 Not recommended trandolapril and verapamil SR used concomitantly; trandolapril and verapamil SR used individually RCT, Meta-analysis · OS | PFS | DFS | ORR | QoL | Surrogate | Cost-minimisation | Other | null

Similar precedents

By decision profile

Regulatory · TGA

Label equal than PBS population — Both texts specify treatment of hypertension with the same contraindication on initiating therapy; PBAC adds clarification but does not narrow the population.