← The record

TeriflunomideAPO-TERIFLUNOMIDE

Not recommended NeurologyAuthority Required 💬 consumer voice

Treatment of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).

4
Submissions
2 resub
2012–16
On the record
ICER range
Cost-min
Cost basis
risk sharing

Decisions on record

3 decisions
  • Meeting Nov 2016 Not recommended Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS)
  • Meeting Jul 2013 Recommended Multiple sclerosis
  • Meeting Nov 2012 Not recommended Multiple sclerosis

Access path

4 submissions · public record
  1. TGA registered · APO-TERIFLUNOMIDE

    TGA label narrower than the PBS population

  2. 2012
    Recommended

    vs interferon beta-1a and interferon beta-1b

  3. Nov 2012
    Not recommended

    insufficient evidence of non-inferiority in comparative effectiveness, increased relapse rate in teriflunomide group vs…

  4. ↻ resubmitted
    Jul 2013
    Recommended · restricted
  5. Nov 2016
    Not recommended

    market for oral therapies for RRMS had not yet stabilised; utilisation of other oral therapies (fingolimod and DMF) was…

RecommendedDeferredNot recommended

From the public summary

Verbatim · PSD text · may span indications
PBAC outcome
6.1 The PBAC decided not to recommend amending the listing of teriflunomide to Authority Required (STREAMLINED), as it considered that the market for oral therapies for RRMS had not yet stabilised.PSD · Nov 2016
6.2 The PBAC noted the input from the DUSC secretariat with regards to the utilisation of all RRMS therapies, and noted that the utilisation of the other oral therapies, 4PSD · Nov 2016

Cost-effectiveness

Cost-minimisation basis; no ICER calculated.

The PBAC has previously accepted IFN β-1a and IFN β-1b as appropriate comparators. PBAC · 2016
Surrogate endpointCost-effectiveness accepted

Decision context

PopulationPatients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).

Risk sharingRisk Share Arrangement (RSA) with annual Commonwealth expenditure cap in place for teriflunomide.

Why it was knocked back

  • market for oral therapies for RRMS had not yet stabilised; utilisation of other oral therapies (fingolimod and DMF) was higher and the market for oral treatments was still growing

Submission history

4 entries
DecidedOutcomeComparatorICEREvidence
Nov 2016 Not recommended interferon β-1a and interferon β-1b Cost-minimisation · Cost-minimisation
Jul 2013 Recommended · restricted interferon beta-1a and interferon beta-1b RCT · ARR
Nov 2012 Not recommended interferon beta-1a and interferon beta-1b RCT · ARR
2012 Recommended interferon beta-1a and interferon beta-1b RCT, indirect comparison · OS, PFS, DFS, ORR, QoL, Surrogate

Clinical evidence

Trials cited in the PSDs · ClinicalTrials.gov
TrialPhaseNPrimary outcomeStatus
TENERE Ph 3 324 Core Treatment Period: Overview of Failures completed
TEMSO Ph 3 1,088 Annualized Relapse Rate [ARR]: Poisson Regression Estimates completed
TOWER Ph 3 1,169 Core Treatment Period: Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR): Poisson Regression Estimate completed

Consumer voice

Nov 2016

No consumer comments were received for this item.

The PBAC noted that no consumer comments were received for this item. Consumer comments · PSD

Similar precedents

By decision profile

Regulatory · TGA

Label narrower than PBS population — PBAC restricted subsidy to RRMS only, excluding progressive relapsing forms covered by the broader TGA label.