script.reportAU
Endocrinology

Sibutramine hydrochloride

Brand: Reductil / Ectiva

PBAC's latest decision on Sibutramine hydrochloride: Not recommended (2008). Considered for Management of type 2 diabetics with obesity and abnormalities in high density lipoproteins (HDL) and triglycerides.

PBAC outcome
Not recommended
2008
ICER (AUD/QALY)
$75k/QALY
$15k/QALY–$75k/QALY · across 3 submissions
Submissions
3
first 2006
Submissions
3
2006 → 2008

Eligible population

Type 2 diabetic adults between 18 and 65 years of age with obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m²), who are normotensive or have adequately controlled hypertension (<145/90 mmHg), have not adequately responded to weight-reducing regimen alone, and have either triglycerides >150 mg/dL or HDL <50 mg/dL (females) or <40 mg/dL (males).

Therapy area
Endocrinology
Line of therapy
Not applicable
Evidence base
Meta-analysis
Primary endpoint
Weight loss
Pivotal trial size
167 patients
Key trials
SB3051, SB5075, SB5078, SB6085, SB6087
Comparator
lifestyle modification (reduced calorie diet and/or exercise)
Economic model
CUA
Budget impact
$10M
Eligible patients/year
10,000
ICER note
ICER range dependent on UKPDS mortality factor assumption: $15,000–$45,000 when UKPDS mortality rate is halved (base case); $45,000–$75,000 when UKPDS mortality factor assumed zero.
ICER basis
Range aggregates 3 submissions (2006–2008) — not a single base case.

Why PBAC said no

Reasons cited in the latest PSD: no direct data on cardiovascular outcomes, weight loss may be counterbalanced by effects on blood pressure and pulse rate in terms of cardiovascular risk, lack of data on sustainability of weight loss over time, economic modelling hampered by limitations in predicting long term weight changes, fourfold increase in risk of tachycardia with sibutramine

Submission history

Similar precedents

Open on full dashboard →