← The record

SelinexorXPOVIO

Recommended OncologyAuthority RequiredSecond-line line 💬 consumer voice

Relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in adult patients who have received at least one prior therapy, in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone.

6
Submissions
4 resub
2021–22
On the record
ICER range
Cost-min
Cost basis

Decisions on record

6 decisions
  • Meeting Nov 2022 Recommended Relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma
  • Meeting Mar 2022 Recommended Triple class refractory/penta-refractory multiple myeloma
  • Meeting Mar 2022 Not recommended Relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma
  • Meeting Jul 2021 Not recommended Relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma
  • Meeting Jul 2021 Not recommended Triple class refractory/penta-refractory multiple myeloma
  • Meeting Jul 2021 Not recommended Relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Access path

6 submissions · public record
  1. TGA registered · XPOVIO

    TGA label narrower than the PBS population

  2. Jul 2021
    Not recommended

    High risk of bias in pivotal trial (single-arm, non-randomised, unblinded assessment), non-comparable patient…

  3. Jul 2021
    Not recommended

    Comparator changed: rituximab-gemcitabine-oxaliplatin (RGemOx) → bortezomib plus…

  4. Jul 2021
    Not recommended

    uncertain comparative effectiveness, high risk of bias in evidence base, naïve comparisons using non-applicable…

  5. ↻ resubmitted
    Mar 2022
    Recommended · restricted

    Comparator changed: salvage chemotherapy (DCEP: dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide…

  6. Mar 2022
    Not recommended

    Claim of non-inferior effectiveness compared to carfilzomib + dexamethasone not adequately supported by data, immature…

  7. ↻ resubmitted
    Nov 2022
    Recommended

    Comparator changed: carfilzomib + dexamethasone (Cd) → carfilzomib + dexamethasone

  8. PBS listing · Authority Required
RecommendedDeferredNot recommended

From the public summary

Verbatim · PSD text · may span indications
PBAC outcome
7.1 The PBAC recommended the listing of selinexor, for use in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone (SBd), for the treatment of patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who have received at least one prior therapy. The PBAC noted that MM is heterogeneous disease and that there is a clinical need for multiple treatment options, including different drug classes.PSD · Nov 2022
7.2 The PBAC recommended the listing of selinexor as part of SBd, on the basis that it should be available only under special arrangements under Section 100, through the Highly Specialised Drugs program.PSD · Nov 2022
Economic analysis
6.38 The resubmission presented an updated CMA comparing SBd and Cd, that was a more conservative CMA compared with that provided in the March 2022 resubmission. The key revisions included once weekly and twice weekly carfilzomib doses, inclusion of bortezomib administration costs, exclusion of carfilzomib administration costs (conservative assumption which reduces the proposed price of selinexor; see paragraph 6.44) and inclusion of concomitant therapies …PSD · Nov 2022
6.39 The key components and assumptions of the CMA are presented in Table 18.PSD · Nov 2022
Clinical claim
significant benefit for SBd compared with Bd (para 7.1, data remained immature. The resubmission selinexor (RRMM) PSD, March 2022 PBAC meeting). maintained that the claim of non-inferiority between SBd and Cd was supported by the data presented.PSD · Nov 2022
• The PBAC considered that the CMA was not The resubmission presented a CMA based on the informative given that the clinical claim was not clinical claim of non-inferiority between SBd and supported (para 7.13, March 2022 PBAC PSD). Cd. The resubmission revised the CMA to addressPSD · Nov 2022
Consumer comments
6.2 The PBAC noted and welcomed the input from individuals (64) and organisations (3) via the Consumer Comments facility on the PBS website. It was noted that several medicines are available, but not all work for each patient, and eventually these must be discontinued because they are no longer effective or because of side-effects.PSD · Nov 2022
6.3 The PBAC noted the advice received from (i) Myeloma Australia, (ii) the Leukaemia Foundation, and (iii) Myeloma Australia's Medical and Scientific Advisory Group (MSAG), which described an ongoing need for new treatment options and supported the proposed listing for SBd. Myeloma Australia noted that the new class of drug in an effective combination would make significant impact on patients.PSD · Nov 2022

Cost-effectiveness

Cost-minimisation approach (CMA) used; no ICER calculated by design.

As non-inferiority was not demonstrated the PBAC considered the cost minimisation analysis (CMA) between SBd and Cd was not informative. PBAC · 2022
ICER uncertainICER / price too highEconomic model disputedPrice cut / RSA needed

Decision context

PopulationAdult patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma who have received at least one prior therapy, treated with selinexor in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone.

Submission history

6 entries
DecidedOutcomeComparatorICEREvidence
Nov 2022 Recommended carfilzomib + dexamethasone RCT · PFS
Mar 2022 Recommended · restricted dexamethasone + cyclophosphamide + etoposide + cisplatin (DCEP) RCT · OS
Mar 2022 Not recommended carfilzomib + dexamethasone (Cd) RCT · PFS
Jul 2021 Not recommended rituximab-gemcitabine-oxaliplatin (RGemOx) Single-arm · ORR
Jul 2021 Not recommended bortezomib plus dexamethasone (Bd) RCT · PFS
Jul 2021 Not recommended salvage chemotherapy (DCEP: dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin) Single-arm · OS

Clinical evidence

Trials cited in the PSDs · ClinicalTrials.gov
TrialPhaseNPrimary outcomeStatus
STORM Ph 2 202 Part 2: Percentage of Participants With Overall Response Rate (ORR) Per International Myel… completed

Consumer voice

Nov 2022

64 individuals and 3 organisations (Myeloma Australia, Leukaemia Foundation, and Myeloma Australia's MSAG) supported the proposed listing of selinexor, emphasising the need for additional treatment options, quality of life benefits, and the convenience of oral administration.

several medicines are available, but not all work for each patient, and eventually these must be discontinued because they are no longer effective or because of side-effects Consumer comments · PSD
unmet needquality of lifetreatment burdenadditional treatment optionsside effectsaccess to new therapies

Similar precedents

By decision profile

Regulatory · TGA

Label narrower than PBS population — PBAC restricted to second-line RRMM with bortezomib+dexamethasone combination; TGA label includes broader populations and alternative Sd combination.