Salbutamol SulfateAsmol CFC-Free
patients who are unable to achieve coordinated use of other metered dose inhalers containing salbutamol or patients at risk of an acute asthma episode
Decision on record
- Meeting Mar 2010 Not recommended Asthma
Access path
- TGA registered · Asmol CFC-Free
TGA label narrower than the PBS population
- Mar 2010Not recommended
Uncertain clinical benefit (Space Chamber not used in clinical trials; small trial with 18 subjects not powered for…
Cost-effectiveness
Cost comparison analysis presented (three scenarios with cost-savings reported), but no formal ICER calculated. Analysis based on assumption of equivalent clinical effectiveness.
Decision context
Populationpatients who are unable to achieve coordinated use of other metered dose inhalers containing salbutamol or patients at risk of an acute asthma episode
Why it was knocked back
- Uncertain clinical benefit (Space Chamber not used in clinical trials; small trial with 18 subjects not powered for non-inferiority; Cochrane review relates to acute asthma not chronic asthma; no safety data specific to Space Chamber), uncertain cost-effectiveness (cost-saving claim unlikely to eventuate in practice; patients achieving desired health outcome with autohaler unlikely to switch; restrictive prescribing assumptions unrealistic), uncertain utilisation, policy concerns regarding PBS mechanism for spacer subsidy, brand-specific restriction issues, lack of evidence of clinical need for PBS subsidy, failure to demonstrate health benefit to patients or society
Submission history
| Decided | Outcome | Comparator | ICER | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2010 | Not recommended | Airomir Autohaler (breath-actuated device) and salbutamol nebules/nebuliser solution | — | RCT, Cost-minimisation |
Similar precedents
Regulatory · TGA
Label narrower than PBS population — PBAC restricts to patients unable to coordinate MDI use or at risk of acute asthma; TGA label covers all asthma/COPD bronchospasm relief.