← The record

Risedronate SodiumActonel

Recommended EndocrinologyRestrictedFirst-line line 💬 consumer voice

Primary prevention of fractures in patients with osteoporosis aged less than 70 years with a BMD T-score of -2.5 or less, without a history of minimal trauma fracture.

8
Submissions
7 resub
2006–23
On the record
$15k–45k
ICER range
3 sourced ICERs · 2006–2008
Cost basis

Decisions on record

7 decisions
  • Meeting Mar 2011 Recommended Osteoporosis no PSD
  • Meeting Jul 2010 Not recommended Treatment of osteoporosis; Treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis; Preservation of bone mineral density in patients on long term corticosteroid therapy.
  • Meeting Mar 2009 Recommended Anti-resorptive agent no PSD
  • Meeting Jul 2008 Recommended Osteoporosis
  • Meeting Mar 2008 Recommended Osteoporosis no PSD
  • Meeting Sep 2002 Recommended Treatment for osteoporosis (once weekly presentation) no PSD
  • Meeting Dec 2001 Recommended Re-submission requests listing in patients who have already sustained a fracture. Original submission proposed listing as prevention before fracture had occurred. no PSD

Access path

8 submissions · public record
  1. TGA registered · Actonel

    TGA label narrower than the PBS population

  2. Jul 2006
    Not recommended

    uncertain benefit in non-vertebral fracture and hip fracture in target subgroup (aged 75+ years, BMD ≤-3.0, no…

  3. Jul 2006
    Not recommended

    uncertain benefit in non-vertebral fracture and hip fracture in the clinically relevant subgroup (patients without…

  4. ↻ resubmitted
    Mar 2007
    Recommended · restricted

    Comparator changed: placebo or 'watchful waiting' (patient monitoring and standard…

  5. Jul 2008
    Recommended · restricted

    Comparator changed: alendronate → placebo

  6. Jul 2010
    Recommended

    Comparator changed: placebo → alendronate

  7. Jul 2010
    Noted

    Comparator changed: placebo → alendronate

  8. Mar 2013
    Recommended · restricted

    Comparator changed: alendronate sodium → alendronate

  9. Mar 2023
    Not recommended

    Comparator changed: alendronate → placebo or 'watchful waiting' (patient monitoring and…

RecommendedDeferredNot recommended

From the public summary

Verbatim · PSD text · may span indications
PBAC outcome
7.1 The PBAC deferred making a recommendation to amend the current age restriction 34PSD · Mar 2023
7.2 The PBAC noted that while input from specialist medical organisations including the Australian and New Zealand Bone and Mineral Society, the Endocrine Society of Australia, and the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists supported amending the lower age restriction of the current risedronate listing they did not support the total removal of an age restriction (see paragraph 6.2).PSD · Mar 2023
Economic analysis
6.49 The economic evaluation was based on early initiation of treatment with risedronate EC in eligible patients aged less than 70 years, versus delayed treatment with standard of care therapies (predominantly denosumab) in patients who fracture or reach the age of 70 years.PSD · Mar 2023
Treatment effect estimates for standard of care were based on estimated treatment effects for alendronate, denosumab, risedronate and zoledronic acid. Individual treatment effects were derived from published results of an indirect comparison of alendronate (FIT-CFA) and denosumab (FREEDOM) placebo-controlled trials in subgroups with BMD T-scores <-2.5 who are without fracture (denosumab PSD, March 2012 PBAC meeting).PSD · Mar 2023
Clinical claim
6.38 The submission described risedronate EC as superior in terms of efficacy and non- inferior in terms of safety compared to placebo.PSD · Mar 2023
6.39 The clinical evidence included in the submission was based on the risedronate 5 mg daily immediate release formulation only, however, the supportive data suggests non- inferiority in terms of efficacy between the risedronate EC once weekly and risedronate 5 mg immediate release formulations which is consistent with prior PBAC considerations of various risedronate formulations.PSD · Mar 2023
Consumer comments
• The ANZBMS advised it was open to expanded PBS criteria for risedronate for patients aged 50 years and over at increased risk of fracture, however was not supportive of expanding the listing to patients aged under 50 years, due to the lack of clear evidence of benefit and risk of adverse events.PSD · Mar 2023
• The ESA advised it was of the view that removing the age restriction entirely would create a risk of inappropriate use of risedronate in premenopausal women or younger individuals without specialist consideration, which may lead to adverse outcomes. Instead, ESA was supportive of amending the age restriction, such as subsidising therapy in patients over the age of 50 with low BMD T-scores and at risk of fracture.PSD · Mar 2023

Cost-effectiveness

3 sourced ICERs · 2006–2008

Document appears truncated; economic model details not fully available in provided text.

The PBAC considered the estimated financial saving to the PBS were highly uncertain due to assumptions regarding utilisation, distribution of scripts across formulations, potential for switching between monotherapy/combination therapy, patient co-payments and the uncertain overall weighted price of risedronate. PBAC · 2013
ICER uncertain ×2ICER / price too highEconomic model disputed ×2Surrogate endpointCost-effectiveness accepted

Decision context

PopulationPatients aged less than 70 years with osteoporosis (BMD T-score of -2.5 or less) without a history of minimal trauma fracture

Submission history

8 entries
DecidedOutcomeComparatorICEREvidence
Mar 2023 Not recommended placebo or 'watchful waiting' (patient monitoring and standard management with calcium and vitamin D) RCT · Fracture prevention
Mar 2013 Recommended · restricted alendronate Meta-analysis · Fracture risk reduction
Jul 2010 Recommended alendronate RCT, registry, cost-minimisation · OS, PFS, DFS, ORR, QoL, Surrogate
Jul 2010 Noted alendronate sodium Meta-analysis
Jul 2008 Recommended · restricted placebo $15k–45k RCT · null
Mar 2007 Recommended · restricted alendronate RCT, Meta-analysis · OS | PFS | DFS | ORR | QoL | Surrogate
Jul 2006 Not recommended placebo or 'watchful waiting' (patient monitoring and standard management with calcium and vitamin D) $15k–45k RCT
Jul 2006 Not recommended placebo or 'watchful waiting' (patient monitoring and standard management with calcium and vitamin D) $15k–45k RCT · fracture_incidence

Consumer voice

Mar 2023

Specialist medical organisations and a consumer organisation provided input on expanded PBS criteria for risedronate. While most medical bodies supported amendments to age restrictions with caution about premenopausal women, Healthy Bones Australia advocated for broader access to reduce fracture burden.

The ANZBMS advised it was open to expanded PBS criteria for risedronate for patients aged 50 years and over at increased risk of fracture, however was not supportive of expanding the listing to patients aged under 50 years, due to the lack of clear evidence of benefit and risk of adverse events. Consumer comments · PSD
access barrierssafety concernsunmet needtreatment eligibilitypublic health burden

Similar precedents

By decision profile

Regulatory · TGA

Label narrower than PBS population — PBAC restricts to age <70 years, BMD T-score ≤-2.5, and no prior minimal trauma fracture; TGA label is broader.