← The record

Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccine, Recombinant Pre-Fusion F Protein

Recommended VaccinesRestrictedFirst-line line 💬 consumer voice

Prevention of lower respiratory tract illness (LRTI) caused by respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in infants from birth through 6 months of age by active immunisation of pregnant women.

1
Submissions
2024–24
On the record
ICER range
Cost basis

Access path

1 submission · public record
  1. May 2024
    Recommended

    vs standard medical management (no vaccine)

  2. PBS listing · Restricted
RecommendedDeferredNot recommended

From the public summary

Verbatim · PSD text · may span indications
PBAC outcome
7.1 The PBAC did not recommend recombinant syncytial pre-fusion F protein vaccine (RSVpreF) for the prevention of lower respiratory tract illness (LRTI) caused by respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in infants from birth through 6 months of age by active immunisation of pregnant women.PSD · Mar 2024
39 McRae, J.E., McHugh, L., King, C., Beard, F.H., Blyth, C.C., Danchin, M.H., Giles, M.L., Mohammed, H., Wood, N. and Macartney, K. (2023), Influenza and pertussis vaccine coverage in pregnancy in Australia, 2016–2021. Med J Aust, 218: 528- 541. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.51989PSD · Mar 2024
Economic analysis
6.47 The submission presented a cost-utility analysis based on the MATISSE clinical trial, measuring outcomes in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). This was consistent with the clinical claim of superior effectiveness. Key components of the economic evaluation are presented in Table 11. 21PSD · Mar 2024
Time horizon As the model estimates the QALY difference over a lifetime, the time horizon is technically a lifetime.PSD · Mar 2024
Clinical claim
6.42 The submission described RSVpreF as superior in terms of effectiveness compared to placebo. The ESC agreed with the commentary that this claim was adequately supported. In the key MATISSE trial, administration of RSVpreF to pregnant women resulted in a reduction in RSV-positive MA-LRTI in infants up to 180 days after birth, corresponding to a VE of 51.3% (97.58% CI:29.4%, 66.8%), which met the statistical criterion for success for the primary …PSD · Mar 2024
Hospitalisations due to RSV were also reduced in the RSVpreF group up to 180 days after birth, giving a VE of 56.8% (99.17% CI:10.1%, 80.7%). The key areas of uncertainty include a lack of evidence for the efficacy of the vaccine in infants born prematurely, and those resulting from multiple pregnancies and non-healthy pregnancies.PSD · Mar 2024
Consumer comments
6.3 The comments from the Immunisation Foundation of Australia described a range of benefits of the proposed vaccine stating that protecting infants from RSV would provide a healthier start to life and reduce paediatric hospital burden.PSD · Mar 2024
6.4 The Lung Foundation Australia stated that listing RSVpreF on the NIP would provide clinicians and patients with access to an effective vaccine, reduce the risk of disease, disability and death associated with RSV, and reduce costs to health system, particularly among children and immunocompromised individuals. The input stated that based on a survey of over 800 consumers, on average, Australian consumers were “very worried” about RSV.PSD · Mar 2024

Cost-effectiveness

ICER value not stated in the public text provided; economic analysis was conducted but the specific ICER appears to be in a section of the document not included in the excerpt.

Decision context

PopulationPregnant women between 24 and 36 weeks of gestation (updated ATAGI advice: 28 to 36 weeks) to prevent RSV-associated lower respiratory tract illness in infants aged 0 to 6 months.

Submission history

1 entries
DecidedOutcomeComparatorICEREvidence
May 2024 Recommended standard medical management (no vaccine) RCT

Consumer voice

May 2024

Three consumer organisations provided input via the PBS website Consumer Comments facility. The PBAC noted and welcomed this input.

The PBAC noted and welcomed the input from organisations (3) via the Consumer Comments facility on the PBS website. Consumer comments · PSD

Similar precedents

By decision profile