← The record

Perfluorohexyloctane

Recommended OphthalmologyAuthority RequiredNot applicable line

Treatment of severe dry eye syndrome in patients who are sensitive to preservatives in multi-dose eye drops.

1
Submissions
2018–18
On the record
ICER range
Cost-min
Cost basis

Decision on record

1 decision
  • Meeting Mar 2018 Recommended Severe dry eye syndrome

Access path

1 submission · public record
  1. Mar 2018
    Recommended · restricted

    vs soy lecithin

  2. PBS listing · Authority Required
RecommendedDeferredNot recommended

From the public summary

Verbatim · PSD text · may span indications
PBAC outcome
7.1 The PBAC recommended a General Schedule and an Optometric Schedule Authority Required (STREAMLINED) listing of perfluorohexyloctane for the treatment of severe dry-eye syndrome in patients who are sensitive to preservatives in multi-dose eye drops.PSD · Mar 2018
7.2 The PBAC noted that the submission did not specify the maximum quantity or number of repeats for the proposed restriction. The PBAC considered that the maximum quantity should be consistent with other multi-dose preservative-free ocular lubricants on the PBS with a maximum quantity of 1 and the number of repeats should be limited to 5.PSD · Mar 2018
Economic analysis
6.5 The submission did not specify a particular economic analysis, it presented a cost comparison across a number of PBS listed preservative-free ocular lubricants and perfluorohexyloctane (Table 1) with a proposed AEMP of $'''''''''''.PSD · Mar 2018
6.6 The submission stated that due to the nature of packaging of preservative-free ocular lubricant solutions, the majority of PBS listed items are available in single use containers to prevent contamination. The Sponsor stated that single use containers may contain an excess ocular lubricant solution, and are associated with unnecessary wastage and higher treatment costs. 3PSD · Mar 2018
Consumer comments
6.2 The PBAC noted that there was no consumer comment for this submission.PSD · Mar 2018

Cost-effectiveness

Minor submission with cost comparison only; no formal ICER calculated. Economic analysis presented cost comparison across PBS-listed preservative-free ocular lubricants.

The PBAC considered that there was a level of uncertainty in the financial estimates from patients switching between different lubricants, it considered that the cost implications would be minimal. PBAC · 2018
ICER uncertainCost-effectiveness accepted

Decision context

PopulationPatients with severe dry eye syndrome who are sensitive to preservatives in multi-dose eye drops.

Submission history

1 entries
DecidedOutcomeComparatorICEREvidence
Mar 2018 Recommended · restricted soy lecithin Single-arm · Other

Similar precedents

By decision profile