PegcetacoplanEmpaveli
Treatment of patients aged 12 years and older with complement 3 glomerulopathy (C3G) or primary immune complex membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (IC-MPGN) to reduce proteinuria and stabilise or slow decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate.
Decisions on record
- Meeting Mar 2026 Not recommended Complement 3 glomerulopathy (C3G) or primary immune complex membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (IC-MPGN)
- Meeting Nov 2025 Recommended Bilateral geographic atrophy or dry AMD secondary to age-related macular degeneration with intact fovea in treated eye
- Meeting May 2025 Recommended Paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (treatment-naïve or C5 inhibitor treated)
- Meeting Mar 2024 Withdrawn Geographic atrophy secondary to age-related macular degeneration no PSD
- Meeting Jul 2022 Recommended Paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria with inadequate response or intolerance to C5 inhibitor treatment
- Meeting Mar 2022 Not recommended Paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria
Access path
- TGA registered · Empaveli
TGA label narrower than the PBS population
- Mar 2022Recommended · restricted
vs eculizumab and ravulizumab
- Jul 2022Recommended · restricted
Comparator changed: eculizumab and ravulizumab → ravulizumab
- May 2025Recommended · restricted
- Nov 2025Recommended · restricted
Comparator changed: ravulizumab → best supportive care
- Mar 2026Not recommended
Comparator changed: best supportive care → standard of care consisting of RAAS blockade…
From the public summary
7.1 The PBAC did not recommend listing pegcetacoplan for treatment of complement 3 glomerulopathy (C3G) or primary immune complex membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (IC-MPGN). The PBAC considered that there is a high clinical need for treatments for C3G or IC-MPGN, which are conditions that impact relatively young patients and cause decline in kidney function.PSD · Mar 2026
7.2 The PBAC considered that the primary reason for this outcome was the economic evaluation.PSD · Mar 2026
6.68 The submission presented an economic evaluation of pegcetacoplan compared to standard of care for the treatment of patients aged 12 years or older with C3G or primary IC-MPGN with native kidneys or disease recurrence following a kidney transplant. The economic evaluation was based on the VALIANT trial with additional modelled data. The economic evaluation was presented as a cost-effectiveness/cost- utility analysis.PSD · Mar 2026
6.69 Key components of the economic evaluation are summarised in Table 10.PSD · Mar 2026
Pegcetacoplan is likely to be superior in terms of efficacy compared to iptacopan. No clinical claim was made regarding comparative safety Source: Table 1-1, p15 of the submission Abbreviations: ACEI/ARB, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker; C3G, complement 3 glomerulopathy; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; IC-MPGN, immune-complex membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis; RAAS, renin- …PSD · Mar 2026
6.60 The submission described pegcetacoplan as superior in terms of efficacy compared to standard of care. The evaluation considered this claim was reasonable in terms of short-term reductions in proteinuria but was inadequately supported in terms of changes in eGFR decline and longer-term reductions in the risk of progression to end- stage kidney disease.PSD · Mar 2026
6.2 The PBAC noted and welcomed the input from health care professionals (6), health -care related organisations (3), consumer groups (1) and individuals (69) via the Office of Health Technology Assessment Consultation Hub.PSD · Nov 2025
6.3 The PBAC noted feedback from prospective consumers who would like to access the medicine to treat their own health condition which described the significant cost barriers associated with access to pegcetacoplan especially for those at advanced age.PSD · Nov 2025
Cost-effectiveness
ICER value not stated in the public text; economic model details are not disclosed in this PSD.
The ESC agreed with the evaluation that, while pegcetacoplan may slow the progression of GA lesion growth, it was highly uncertain how this will translate into a delay in loss of visual acuity for patients. PBAC · 2025
Decision context
PopulationPatients aged 12 years and older with C3G or primary IC-MPGN with native kidneys or disease recurrence following a kidney transplant, with eGFR ≥30 mL/min/1.73 m² and not undergoing dialysis, weighing at least 30 kg.
Submission history
| Decided | Outcome | Comparator | ICER | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2026 | Not recommended | standard of care consisting of RAAS blockade (ACEI/ARB), SGLT2i and lifestyle measures, with or without immunosuppressiv | — | RCT |
| Nov 2025 | Recommended · restricted | best supportive care | — | RCT · Surrogate |
| May 2025 | Recommended · restricted | ravulizumab | — | Cost-minimisation · Cost-minimisation |
| Jul 2022 | Recommended · restricted | ravulizumab | — | Cost-minimisation · Cost-minimisation |
| Mar 2022 | Recommended · restricted | eculizumab and ravulizumab | — | RCT · Other |
Clinical evidence
| Trial | Phase | N | Primary outcome | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GALE | Ph 3 | 792 | Incidence and severity of ocular and systemic adverse events | completed |
Consumer voice
Consumers and healthcare professionals highlighted the significant quality-of-life benefits of pegcetacoplan in slowing geographic atrophy progression and preserving eyesight, while emphasizing substantial financial barriers to private prescription access and concerns about PBS subsidisation limiting treatment to one eye only.
The PBAC acknowledged the lived experience of individual consumers using pegcetacoplan under private prescription, and the benefits associated with slowing progression of GA and preservation of existing eyesight, as these outcomes most directly contributed to maintenance of quality of life and independence. Consumer comments · PSD
Similar precedents
Regulatory · TGA
Label narrower than PBS population — PBAC restricts to non-subfoveal GA with fellow eye subfoveal involvement; TGA label lacks fellow eye requirement and specificity.
Listed in law
PBS listings commencing 1 Dec 2022 were made by these 4 determinations under the National Health Act 1953. A determination covers every listing that commenced that day, so this is the legal instrument in force for the date — not a document naming this medicine. Open it and check.
| Determination | Made | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB 111 of 2022 | 30 Nov 2022 | Repealed | PDF ↗ |
| PB 111 of 2022 | 30 Nov 2022 | Repealed | PDF ↗ |
| PB 112 of 2022 | 30 Nov 2022 | Repealed | PDF ↗ |
| PB 113 of 2022 | 30 Nov 2022 | Repealed | PDF ↗ |