← The record

PalovaroteneSohonos

Recommended Rare diseaseAuthority RequiredFirst-line line 💬 consumer voice

Chronic treatment of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) to reduce the formation of heterotopic ossification, and flare-up treatment of FOP in patients aged ≥8 years (females) or ≥10 years (males).

1
Submissions
2024–24
On the record
Redacted
ICER range
commercial-in-confidence
Redacted
Cost basis

Decision on record

1 decision
  • Meeting Nov 2024 Recommended Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva

Access path

1 submission · public record
  1. TGA registered · Sohonos

    TGA label narrower than the PBS population

  2. Nov 2024
    Recommended

    vs standard of care (SoC) comprising symptomatic treatment of…

  3. PBS listing · Authority Required
RecommendedDeferredNot recommended

From the public summary

Verbatim · PSD text · may span indications
PBAC outcome
7.1 The PBAC recommended the listing of palovarotene for the treatment of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP). The PBAC recognised the high and urgent clinical need for treatments for FOP, which is an ultra-rare disease with very substantial impacts on quality of life for patients and their carers.PSD · Nov 2024
The PBAC also advised the clinical trial data and uncertain economic modelling meant the rule of rescue claim that palovarotene provided a worthwhile clinical 34PSD · Nov 2024
Economic analysis
6.57 The submission presented a stepped economic evaluation based on the MOVE study.PSD · Nov 2024
The type of economic evaluation presented was a cost-utility analysis.PSD · Nov 2024
Clinical claim
6.52 The submission described palovarotene (in combination with SoC) as having superior efficacy and inferior safety compared to SoC.PSD · Nov 2024
6.53 The therapeutic conclusion of efficacy is supported by lower annualised HO in the PBS relevant subgroup. This was consistent with the view of the TGA ACM, which concluded that the results of the post-hoc comparison of annualised new HO demonstrated meaningful benefit. The ESC agreed with the commentary that the magnitude of this benefit was highly uncertain as:PSD · Nov 2024
Consumer comments
6.2 The PBAC noted and welcomed the input from 2 organisations (FOP Australia and International FOP Association) via the Consumer Comments facility on the PBS website. The PBAC noted that the comments from FOP Australia reflected input from 12 individuals including people living with FOP, their friends and family members. The comments described the experience of living with FOP, and the challenges and priorities for people with FOP and their families.PSD · Nov 2024
The bone growth of FOP leads to a wide range of complications, including death. 2. Anything that can reduce or delay any amount of bone growth is of huge value to patients, including those at advanced stages, as even tiny amounts of bone can be extremely functionally significant. 8PSD · Nov 2024

Cost-effectiveness

The document does not provide an explicit numeric ICER value. The economic model section appears to be redacted or omitted from the provided text.

Decision context

PopulationPatients with FOP aged ≥8 years (females) or ≥10 years (males), confirmed by genetic testing for pathogenic ACVR1 gene mutation.

Submission history

1 entries
DecidedOutcomeComparatorICEREvidence
Nov 2024 Recommended standard of care (SoC) comprising symptomatic treatment of flare-ups RCT · Annualised change in new HO volume

Clinical evidence

Trials cited in the PSDs · ClinicalTrials.gov
TrialPhaseNPrimary outcomeStatus
MOVE Ph 3 107 Annualized New Heterotopic Ossification (HO) completed

Consumer voice

Nov 2024

Two organisations (FOP Australia and International FOP Association) provided input reflecting experiences of 12 individuals with FOP and their families. The comments emphasised living with unpredictable bone growth causing progressive loss of independence, and the value of any intervention that reduces or delays bone growth, even minimally.

Living with FOP means living with the constant threat of unpredictable bone growth, causing progressive and painful loss of independence and mobility. Consumer comments · PSD
unmet needdisease burdenprogressive disabilityquality of lifetreatment benefitfunctional impairment

Similar precedents

By decision profile

Regulatory · TGA

Label narrower than PBS population — PBAC restricts to first-line use and requires genetic confirmation of ACVR1 mutation; TGA label lacks these requirements.