← The record

Odevixibat

Not recommended HepatologyRestrictedFirst-line line 💬 consumer voice

Treatment of cholestatic pruritus in Alagille syndrome (ALGS) in patients aged six months and older.

3
Submissions
1 resub
2024–26
On the record
$355k–455k
ICER range
1 sourced ICER · 2025
Redacted
Cost basis

Decisions on record

4 decisions
  • Meeting Mar 2026 Not recommended Alagille syndrome (ALGS)
  • Meeting Jul 2025 Recommended Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis no PSD
  • Meeting Mar 2025 Deferred Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC)
  • Meeting Jul 2024 Not recommended Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis

Access path

3 submissions · public record
  1. Jul 2024
    Not recommended

    vs standard of care including partial external biliary…

  2. ↻ resubmitted
    Mar 2025
    Recommended · restricted

    Comparator changed: standard of care including partial external biliary diversion and…

  3. Mar 2026
    Not recommended

    Comparator changed: standard of care (SoC) including partial external biliary diversion…

RecommendedDeferredNot recommended

From the public summary

Verbatim · PSD text · may span indications
PBAC outcome
7.1 The PBAC did not recommend odevixibat for the treatment of cholestatic pruritus in Alagille syndrome (ALGS) in patients aged six months and older. The PBAC considered that there is high unmet clinical need for this rare genetic condition, which has severe impacts on quality of life, including sleep, comfort, and wellbeing.PSD · Mar 2026
The PBAC considered the financial estimates need to be revised. The PBAC considered that a risk sharing arrangement (RSA) would be required.PSD · Mar 2026
Economic analysis
6.51 The type of economic evaluation presented was a cost-utility analysis, using quality- adjusted life years (QALYs) as the final health outcome. The key components of the 6.52PSD · Mar 2026
6.53 Table 13. The model structure was similar to the model submitted for the PBAC July- 2025 resubmission of odevixibat in PFIC, which the ESC previously considered unreliable for decision making because of both implausible structural assumptions and continuing uncertainty in data inputs (see Odevixibat PFIC PBAC July-2025 PSD, paragraphs 6.63 and 13.3).PSD · Mar 2026
Clinical claim
6.46 The submission described odevixibat as superior in terms of effectiveness compared to SoC. The evaluation considered that this claim was partially supported by direct evidence from ASSERT, i.e.:PSD · Mar 2026
• Odevixibat treatment led to a statistically significant decrease in the ObsRO pruritus scratching score over 24 weeks compared with placebo (LS mean difference - 0.88 [95% CI: -1.44, -0.33] p=0.0024).PSD · Mar 2026
Consumer comments
6.2 The PBAC noted and welcomed the input from individuals (1), health care professionals (4) and organisations (2) via the Consumer Comments facility on the PBS website associated with this resubmission. The PBAC also recalled that the July 2024 submission received input from individuals (35), health care professionals (4) and organisations (3). The comments described a range of benefits of treatment with odevixibat.PSD · Mar 2025
6.3 The PBAC noted the advice received from PFIC Network, PFIC and Related Disorders Australia, and Liver Foundation stating that PFIC often results in a “horrendous itch” that, in some cases may be incessant and lead to continuous scratching and bleeding, lack of sleep, anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and ultimately poor quality of life for patients, as well as their families.PSD · Mar 2025

Cost-effectiveness

1 sourced ICER · 2025

ICER value redacted/commercially sensitive; not stated in public summary document

ICER / price too highEconomic model disputedPrice cut / RSA needed

Decision context

PopulationPatients with cholestatic pruritus in Alagille syndrome (ALGS) aged six months or older, with elevated serum bile acids, experiencing itch with average pruritus score ≥2 on Prucision ObsRO Pruritus Scale.

Submission history

3 entries
DecidedOutcomeComparatorICEREvidence
Mar 2026 Not recommended standard of care (SoC) including biliary diversion surgery (SBD) and liver transplant (LT) — RCT
Mar 2025 Recommended · restricted standard of care (SoC) including partial external biliary diversion (PEBD) and liver transplantation (LT) $355k–455k RCT · Pruritus response and serum bile acid response
Jul 2024 Not recommended standard of care including partial external biliary diversion and liver transplantation — RCT · Surrogate

Clinical evidence

Trials cited in the PSDs · ClinicalTrials.gov
TrialPhaseNPrimary outcomeStatus
PEDFIC 1 Ph 3 62 Percentage of Participants With at Least a 70% Reduction in Fasting Serum Bile Acid (s-BA)… completed
PEDFIC 2 Ph 3 116 Change From Baseline in Serum Bile Acids completed

Consumer voice

Mar 2025

Consumer input from individuals, healthcare professionals, and patient organisations described significant benefits of odevixibat treatment including improved quality of life with reduced itch, improved sleep, reduced anxiety, and increased ability to attend school and work. Patient organisations emphasised that PFIC causes severe itch leading to poor quality of life, job losses, and inability to

2 months after the first dose, we almost forgot about the itching Consumer comments · PSD
quality of lifetreatment burdenunmet needside effectsaccess barrierssymptom relief

Similar precedents

By decision profile

Regulatory · TGA

Label narrower than PBS population — PBAC restricts to patients with elevated serum bile acids AND pruritus score ≥2; TGA label has no such biomarker/symptom requirements.

Listed in law

Federal Register of Legislation

PBS listings commencing 1 Jan 2026 were made by these 3 determinations under the National Health Act 1953. A determination covers every listing that commenced that day, so this is the legal instrument in force for the date — not a document naming this medicine. Open it and check.

DeterminationMadeStatus
PB 152 of 2025 23 Dec 2025 Repealed PDF ↗
PB 153 of 2025 23 Dec 2025 Repealed PDF ↗
PB 154 of 2025 23 Dec 2025 Repealed PDF ↗