← The record

NemolizumabNemluvio

Recommended DermatologyAuthority Required 💬 consumer voice

Treatment of patients aged 12 years or older with chronic severe atopic dermatitis affecting the whole body, face, and/or hands who are inadequately controlled on topical therapies.

2
Submissions
1 resub
2025–26
On the record
—
ICER range
Cost-min
Cost basis

Decisions on record

2 decisions
  • Meeting Mar 2026 Recommended Atopic dermatitis
  • Meeting Jul 2025 Not recommended Severe atopic dermatitis affecting whole body, face, and/or hands

Access path

2 submissions · public record
  1. TGA registered · Nemluvio

    TGA label narrower than the PBS population

  2. Jul 2025
    Not recommended

    vs dupilumab

  3. ↻ resubmitted
    Mar 2026
    Recommended · restricted

    Evidence: Indirect treatment comparison (ITC) → RCT

  4. PBS listing · Authority Required
RecommendedDeferredNot recommended

From the public summary

Verbatim · PSD text · may span indications
PBAC outcome
7.1 The PBAC recommended the listing of nemolizumab (NEMO) for the treatment of patients with severe atopic dermatitis (AD) affecting the whole body, face, and/or hands. The PBAC, noting the additional data presented in the resubmission that included treatment with an extended NEMO induction period, considered the submission’s clinical claim of non-inferior effectiveness of NEMO to dupilumab (DUPI) was adequately supported.PSD · Mar 2026
7.2 The PBAC noted the sponsor hearing which highlighted safety benefits associated with NEMO, and the inputs received again from the Australasian College of Dermatologists (ACD), the Australasian Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergy (ASCIA) and a joint submission between Allergy & Anaphylaxis Australia, and the National Allergy Council, all of which supported the listing of NEMO on the PBS for AD.PSD · Mar 2026
Economic analysis
6.31 The resubmission presented a CMA comparing NEMO with DUPI for the treatment of patients aged 12 years or older with chronic severe AD.PSD · Mar 2026
6.32 The key components of the CMA are summarised in Table 12.PSD · Mar 2026
Clinical claim
6.27 The resubmission described NEMO as non-inferior in terms of effectiveness compared to DUPI. In the previous submission, the ITCs used to support the claim of non-inferior efficacy had several transitivity issues and indicated that NEMO may have inferior efficacy when compared to DUPI.PSD · Mar 2026
The data included from the ARCADIA LTE was single arm, open-label, and based on a subgroup determined post-hoc to consist of patients who did not respond at Week 16.PSD · Mar 2026
Consumer comments
6.3 The PBAC noted and welcomed the input from health care professionals (1) and organisations (3) via the Consumer Comments facility on the PBS website. The PBAC noted inputs received from the Australasian College of Dermatologists (ACD), Eczema Support Australia and a joint submission between Allergy & Anaphylaxis Australia, Australasian Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergy (ASCIA) and the National Allergy Council, which were all in support of …PSD · Jul 2025
6.4 All inputs stated that atopic dermatitis can impact an individual’s ability to participate in social, work, and educational activities. Itch is often cited as a major debilitating component of atopic dermatitis, resulting in broken painful skin and an increased risk of infection often results in social isolation with poor sleep and low self-esteem contributing to a poor quality of life.PSD · Jul 2025

Cost-effectiveness

Cost minimisation analysis; no ICER calculated by design

The submission presented a CMA comparing NEMO with DUPI for the treatment of chronic severe AD based on a claim of non-inferior effectiveness and safety compared to DUPI, but with fewer injection site reactions and incidences of conjunctivitis. PSD · 2025

Decision context

PopulationPatients aged 12 years or older with chronic severe atopic dermatitis affecting the whole body, face, and/or hands who are inadequately controlled on topical therapies (corticosteroid of medium to high potency or calcineurin inhibitor for at least 28 days).

Submission history

2 entries
DecidedOutcomeComparatorICEREvidence
Mar 2026 Recommended · restricted dupilumab — RCT · EASI-75
Jul 2025 Not recommended dupilumab — Indirect treatment comparison (ITC) · EASI-75 and IGA 0/1 at Week 16

Consumer voice

Jul 2025

Four health care professional and consumer organisations submitted input supporting nemolizumab listing. They emphasised that atopic dermatitis significantly impacts quality of life through severe itch, broken skin, infection risk, and mental health issues, and highlighted the need for alternative treatments with different mechanisms of action for patients who don't respond adequately to current t

Itch is often cited as a major debilitating component of atopic dermatitis, resulting in broken painful skin and an increased risk of infection often results in social isolation with poor sleep and low self-esteem contributing to a poor quality of life. Consumer comments · PSD
quality of lifetreatment burdenunmet needmental health impactaccess barriersside effects/safety profile

Similar precedents

By decision profile

Regulatory · TGA

Label narrower than PBS population — PBAC restricts to chronic severe atopic dermatitis with specific body site involvement and quantified severity thresholds despite prior topical therapy.