← The record

Nebivolol HydrochlorideAPO-NEBIVOLOL

Recommended CardiovascularAuthority Required

Moderate to severe heart failure in patients stabilised on conventional therapy which must include an ACE inhibitor or Angiotensin II receptor antagonist (if tolerated).

2
Submissions
2009–09
On the record
ICER range
Cost-min
Cost basis

Decision on record

1 decision
  • Meeting Nov 2009 Recommended Heart failure

Access path

2 submissions · public record
  1. TGA registered · APO-NEBIVOLOL

    TGA label narrower than the PBS population

  2. Nov 2009
    Recommended · restricted

    Comparator changed: carvedilol, bisoprolol and metoprolol → carvedilol, bisoprolol…

  3. Nov 2009
    Recommended · restricted

    Comparator changed: carvedilol, bisoprolol and metoprolol → carvedilol, bisoprolol…

  4. PBS listing · Authority Required
RecommendedDeferredNot recommended

Cost-effectiveness

Cost-minimisation analysis; no incremental cost-effectiveness ratio calculated.

The PBAC accepted that nebivolol is no worse in terms of efficacy and safety than its pharmacological analogues carvedilol, bisoprolol and metoprolol. PBAC · 2009
Cost-effectiveness accepted

Decision context

PopulationAdults with moderate to severe heart failure stabilised on conventional therapy (including an ACE inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor antagonist if tolerated); based on the TGA indication, patients aged 70 years and older, though evidence exists for efficacy in younger patients.

Submission history

2 entries
DecidedOutcomeComparatorICEREvidence
Nov 2009 Recommended · restricted carvedilol, bisoprolol and metoprolol RCT · other
Nov 2009 Recommended · restricted carvedilol, bisoprolol, metoprolol RCT

Similar precedents

By decision profile

Regulatory · TGA

Label narrower than PBS population — PBAC restricts to patients stabilised on ACE inhibitor or ARB and specifies later-line positioning; TGA label has no such requirements.