← The record

Meningococcal (Groups A, C, W-135 And Y) Oligosaccharide Crm197 Conjugate Vaccine

Recommended VaccinesUnrestrictedNot applicable line 💬 consumer voice

Prevention of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) caused by Neisseria meningitidis serogroups A, C, W-135 and Y in adolescents aged 14-19 years as part of school-based or catch-up immunisation programs.

3
Submissions
1 resub
2018–23
On the record
ICER range
Cost-min
Cost basis

Access path

3 submissions · public record
  1. Jul 2018
    Recommended · restricted

    vs no vaccine (placebo); near-market comparators: MenACWY-TT…

  2. Aug 2018
    Recommended · restricted
  3. Nov 2023
    Recommended

    Comparator changed: no vaccine (placebo); near-market comparators: MenACWY-TT (Nimenrix)…

  4. PBS listing · Unrestricted
RecommendedDeferredNot recommended

From the public summary

Verbatim · PSD text · may span indications
PBAC outcome
6.1 The PBAC recommended the listing of meningococcal serogroup A, C, W-135 and Y oligosaccharides conjugated individually to Corynebacterium diphtheriae CRM197 protein (MenACWY-CRM) vaccine (Menveo® solution for injection) as a designated vaccine on the National Health (Immunisation Program — Designated Vaccines) Determination 2014 (No.PSD · Nov 2023
6.2 The PBAC considered that nomination of Menveo solution and powder for reconstitution and secondary comparator Nimenrix were appropriate.PSD · Nov 2023
Economic analysis
5.10 As a Committee Secretariat submission, the economic analysis has not been independently evaluated.PSD · Nov 2023
5.11 The submission applied the assumption of equivalence between Menveo solution for injection and Menveo solution and powder for reconstitution, with an equi-effective dose of 0.5 mL solution for injection = 0.5 mL solution and powder for reconstitution.PSD · Nov 2023
Clinical claim
5.7 The submission claimed non-inferior comparative effectiveness and non-inferior comparative safety of Menveo solution for injection compared with Menveo solution and powder for reconstitution.PSD · Nov 2023
5.8 The submission also claimed non-inferior comparative effectiveness and non-inferior comparative safety of Menveo solution for injection compared with Nimenrix. This was on the basis that the PBAC had previously found that the claim that Menveo solution and powder for reconstitution had non-inferior comparative effectiveness and non-inferior comparative safety to Nimenrix was reasonable (Menveo PSD, July and August 2018 PBAC Meeting).PSD · Nov 2023

Cost-effectiveness

Cost-minimisation analysis; no ICER calculated. Submission requested the existing nationally negotiated price for MenACWY vaccine with nil net cost to government.

The positive PBAC recommendation for the NIP listing of the MenACWY-TT vaccine for the adolescent population is yet to be implemented and is contingent upon the sponsor of MenACWY-TT accepting a price reduction such that the incremental cost- PSD · 2018
Price cut / RSA needed ×2Surrogate endpointCost-effectiveness accepted

Decision context

PopulationAdolescents aged at least 14 years old but less than 17 years old as part of a school-based program, or aged at least 14 years old but less than 19 years old who did not receive vaccination as part of a school-based program, for prevention of invasive meningococcal disease.

Submission history

3 entries
DecidedOutcomeComparatorICEREvidence
Nov 2023 Recommended Menveo solution and powder for reconstitution; Nimenrix RCT · Immunogenicity and safety
Aug 2018 Recommended · restricted no vaccine (placebo); near-market comparators: MenACWY-TT (Nimenrix) and MenACWY-DT (Menactra) RCT · Surrogate
Jul 2018 Recommended · restricted no vaccine (placebo); near-market comparators: MenACWY-TT (Nimenrix) and MenACWY-DT (Menactra) RCT · Immunogenicity (seroresponse, hSBA titres, GMTs); safety and adverse events

Consumer voice

Nov 2023

No consumer comments were received for this item.

The PBAC noted that no consumer comments were received for this item. Consumer comments · PSD

Similar precedents

By decision profile