Incobotulinumtoxina
Moderate to severe spasticity of the lower limb in adults following stroke, traumatic brain injury, or spinal cord injury.
Decisions on record
- Meeting Mar 2026 Recommended Moderate to severe spasticity of the lower limb in adults following an acute event
- Meeting Jul 2025 Recommended Moderate to severe spasticity of upper limb and dynamic equinus foot deformity in cerebral palsy aged 2+
- Meeting May 2025 Recommended Chronic sialorrhea due to neurological disorders no PSD
- Meeting Nov 2024 Deferred Chronic sialorrhea due to neurological disorders no PSD
- Meeting Nov 2024 Withdrawn Moderate to severe spasticity of the upper limb; dynamic equinus foot deformity in cerebral palsy aged 2-17 years no PSD
Access path
- Jul 2025Recommended · restricted
vs botulinum toxin type A (Botox)
- Mar 2026Recommended · restricted
- PBS listing · Authority Required
From the public summary
7.1 The PBAC recommended the Authority required (STREAMLINED) listing of incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin®), on the basis that it should be available only under special arrangements under Section 100 (Botulinum Toxin Program), for the treatment of moderate to severe spasticity of the lower limb in adults following stroke, traumatic brain injury, or spinal cord injury.PSD · Mar 2026
7.2 The PBAC noted that a submission to the MSAC has been made to amend existing MBS item code 18360 to include incobotulinumtoxinA for the lower limb indication. The PBAC considered that changes to the PBS and MBS listing would have to be implemented on the same date.PSD · Mar 2026
6.44 The submission presented a cost minimisation approach for the economic evaluation.PSD · Mar 2026
The key components and assumptions used in the approach are shown in Table 8.PSD · Mar 2026
6.41 The submission described Xeomin as non-inferior in terms of effectiveness compared to Botox. The evaluation considered this claim was not adequately supported because of two randomised placebo-controlled trials submitted, the larger found no difference between Xeomin and placebo, and this trial was omitted from the indirect treatment comparison.PSD · Mar 2026
6.42 Whilst recognising the uncertainties associated with the comparison, the PBAC considered that overall, the claim of non-inferior comparative effectiveness was reasonable. The PBAC recalled it previously considered Xeomin and Botox would likely have similar effects as they are analogues of each other (paragraph 6.17, Xeomin PSD, July 2014 PBAC meeting).PSD · Mar 2026
6.1 The PBAC noted that no consumer comments were received for this item. The PBAC noted and welcomed the input from the Rehabilitation Medicine Society of Australia and New Zealand (RMSANZ) which was provided with the submission. The correspondence supported the listing of Xeomin on the PBS for adult and paediatric spasticity associated with cerebral palsy.PSD · Jul 2025
Cost-effectiveness
Cost-minimisation approach; no ICER calculated by design.
The submission presented a cost minimisation approach for the economic evaluation. PSD · 2026
Decision context
PopulationAdults aged 18 years or older with moderate to severe unilateral lower limb spasticity (MAS ≥2 or MAS ≥3, as clarified in clinical criteria) following stroke, traumatic brain injury, or spinal cord injury, with functional impairment affecting mobility, activities of daily living, or quality of life.
Submission history
| Decided | Outcome | Comparator | ICER | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2026 | Recommended · restricted | botulinum toxin type A (Botox) | — | RCT · MAS |
| Jul 2025 | Recommended · restricted | botulinum toxin type A (Botox) | — | RCT · Other |
Consumer voice
No formal consumer comments were received. The Rehabilitation Medicine Society of Australia and New Zealand (RMSANZ) provided input supporting the listing of Xeomin on the PBS for adult and paediatric spasticity associated with cerebral palsy.
The PBAC noted that no consumer comments were received for this item. Consumer comments · PSD
Similar precedents
Listed in law
PBS listings commencing 1 Mar 2026 were made by these 4 determinations under the National Health Act 1953. A determination covers every listing that commenced that day, so this is the legal instrument in force for the date — not a document naming this medicine. Open it and check.
| Determination | Made | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB 17 of 2026 | 27 Feb 2026 | Repealed | PDF ↗ |
| PB 18 of 2026 | 26 Feb 2026 | Repealed | PDF ↗ |
| PB 18 of 2026 | 26 Feb 2026 | Repealed | PDF ↗ |
| PB 19 of 2026 | 26 Feb 2026 | Repealed | PDF ↗ |