← The record

Escitalopram

Recommended Mental healthRestrictedNot applicable line

Major depressive disorders, generalised anxiety disorder, and social anxiety disorder. The submission requested listing of a new 20 mg/mL oral liquid strength as a Restricted benefit.

3
Submissions
1 resub
2007–14
On the record
ICER range
Not modelled
Cost basis

Decisions on record

3 decisions
  • Meeting Jul 2014 Recommended Lexapro® Lundbeck Australia Pty Ltd New listing (Minor submission) Major depressive disorders Restricted benefit for major depressive disorders, generalised anxiety disorders and social anxiety disorder. The submission also requested delisting the existing listed 10 mg/mL strength.
  • Meeting Nov 2008 Recommended Mood disorders no PSD
  • Meeting Mar 2007 Not recommended Anti depressant

Access path

3 submissions · public record
  1. Mar 2007
    Not recommended

    uncertain cost-effectiveness, weak evidence for equivalence claim in SAD, short trial duration (12-24 weeks) with…

  2. Mar 2007
    Not recommended

    uncertain cost-effectiveness, cost-minimisation comparison with paroxetine not sufficiently informative, lack of…

  3. ↻ resubmitted
    Jul 2014
    Recommended

    Evidence: RCT → Cost-minimisation

  4. PBS listing · Restricted
RecommendedDeferredNot recommended

From the public summary

Verbatim · PSD text · may span indications
PBAC outcome
7.1 The PBAC recommended the listing of escitalopram 20mg/mL. The PBAC recommended that the restriction be consistent and refer to definitions in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-V) instead of DSM-IV.PSD · Jul 2014
The PBAC recommended the removal of the grandfather restrictions as suggested by the Secretariat.PSD · Jul 2014
Economic analysis
6.8 The submission did not present a formal economic analysis.PSD · Jul 2014
For more detail on PBAC’s view, see section 7 “PBAC outcome”PSD · Jul 2014

Cost-effectiveness

No economic analysis was presented in this submission; this is a minor submission for a new strength formulation with no comparative effectiveness or economic evaluation.

However, as the cost-effectiveness of paroxetine is unknown in SAD or GAD, the comparison did not provide PBAC with a basis for a recommendation to list escitalopram because the cost-minimisation approach taken by the submission was not sufficiently informative. PBAC · 2007
ICER uncertainEconomic model disputed

Decision context

PopulationPatients with major depressive disorders, moderate to severe generalised anxiety disorder (GAD), or moderate to severe social anxiety disorder (SAD) as defined by DSM-V criteria who have not responded to non-pharmacological therapy and either have a GP Mental Health Care Plan or have been assessed by a psychiatrist.

Submission history

3 entries
DecidedOutcomeComparatorICEREvidence
Jul 2014 Recommended Cost-minimisation
Mar 2007 Not recommended paroxetine RCT, Meta-analysis
Mar 2007 Not recommended paroxetine RCT · LSAS

Similar precedents

By decision profile

Regulatory · TGA

Label narrower than PBS population — PBAC restricts to patients who failed non-pharmacological therapy and have GP Mental Health Care Plan or psychiatrist assessment.