← The record

Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil FumarateAdrenaline Viatris

Not recommended Infectious diseaseAuthority RequiredNot applicable line 💬 consumer voice

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to reduce the risk of sexually acquired HIV-1 infection in adults at substantial risk of HIV infection.

1
Submissions
2016–16
On the record
Redacted
ICER range
commercial-in-confidence
Redacted
Cost basis

Access path

1 submission · public record
  1. TGA registered · Adrenaline Viatris

    TGA label narrower than the PBS population

  2. Jul 2016
    Not recommended

    unreliable cost-effectiveness estimates, impractical and inappropriate population restriction criteria based on…

RecommendedDeferredNot recommended

From the public summary

Verbatim · PSD text · may span indications
PBAC outcome
9.1 The PBAC rejected the request for PBS listing on the basis of unacceptable and uncertain cost effectiveness in the proposed population and at the proposed price.PSD · Jul 2016
The PBAC noted that the submission had tried to limit the population that would be eligible for treatment to those at highest risk, which represented a relatively small proportion of the potential population. The PBAC noted this restriction was proposed in order to improve the cost-effectiveness rather than to limit use in those who would not benefit.PSD · Jul 2016
Economic analysis
8.4 The submission presented an economic evaluation using two structurally similar but independent models:PSD · Jul 2016
The first was a Markov state transition model which considered the costs and consequences of prevention, detection and treatment of HIV infection in a homogeneous cohort of individuals at high risk of infection. This model considered the costs and consequences of treating an average individual at high risk of HIV infection without taking into account costs and consequences within the broader population.PSD · Jul 2016
Clinical claim
8.1 The submission described Truvada + SOC as superior in terms of comparative effectiveness and non-inferior in terms of comparative safety over SOC. This claim was not strongly supported in terms of the requested PBS listing.  Truvada + SOC was observed to be significantly more effective than SOC in some of the studies presented by the submission, but this effectiveness was conditional on adherence.PSD · Jul 2016
Consumer comments
6.2 The PBAC noted and welcomed the input from individuals (92), health care professionals (2) and organisations (19) via the Consumer Comments facility on the PBS website. The comments described a range of benefits of use of Truvada for PrEP, including reduction of risk of transmission of HIV, increased screening for HIV and other STIs, and reduced anxiety of contraction of HIV for people at risk.PSD · Jul 2016

Cost-effectiveness

Cost-utility analysis was provided but PBAC considered cost-effectiveness estimates to be unreliable; ICER values not stated in public document.

The PBAC noted that the submission had tried to limit the population that would be eligible for treatment to those at highest risk in order to improve the cost effectiveness. However, the PBAC considered that the cost-effectiveness estimates were unreliable and that attempts to limit the eligible population in the ways proposed by the submission would not be practical or appropriate. PBAC · 2016
ICER uncertainEconomic model disputed

Decision context

PopulationAdults 18 years or older at substantial risk of sexually acquired HIV-1 infection, defined as annual incidence of HIV infection in the absence of PrEP of 3%, who return negative HIV-1 tests and are treated by an antiretroviral therapy approved prescriber within an approved PrEP service.

Why it was knocked back

  • unreliable cost-effectiveness estimates, impractical and inappropriate population restriction criteria based on arbitrary 3% annual incidence threshold, inability to accurately estimate individual risk from self-reported behaviour, unresolved issues regarding financing and organisation of approved PrEP services

Submission history

1 entries
DecidedOutcomeComparatorICEREvidence
Jul 2016 Not recommended standard of care RCT · Other

Clinical evidence

Trials cited in the PSDs · ClinicalTrials.gov
TrialPhaseNPrimary outcomeStatus
iPrEx Ph 3 2,499 HIV Seroconversion completed
TDF2 Ph 2, PHASE3 1,219 Percentage of Participants With Adverse Drug Reactions in the Tenofovir/Emtricitabine and … completed
PROUD Ph 4 544 Time to accrual of 500 participants and Retention at 12 and 24 months from randomisation completed
VOICE Ph 2 5,029 Person-years of Follow-up of Tenofovir 1% Gel and Vaginal Placebo Gel Arms completed

Consumer voice

Jul 2016

Consumer input described benefits of Truvada for PrEP including reduction of HIV transmission risk, increased screening for HIV and other STIs, and reduced anxiety about HIV contraction. Comments also provided insights into clinical use patterns including reasons for initiation and usage patterns.

reduction of risk of transmission of HIV, increased screening for HIV and other STIs, and reduced anxiety of contraction of HIV for people at risk Consumer comments · PSD
HIV preventionreduced anxietyscreening accessunmet needtreatment patterns

Similar precedents

By decision profile

Regulatory · TGA

Label narrower than PBS population — PBAC restricts to adults at substantial risk (≥3% annual incidence) with negative HIV tests treated by approved prescribers in approved services.