← The record

Eltrombopag OlamineELTROMBOPAG-RZ

Not recommended HaematologyAuthority RequiredSecond-line | Later-line line

For initial treatment, as the sole PBS-subsidised thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TRA), of an adult patient with chronic immune (idiopathic) thrombocytopenia purpura (ITP) who is: - Splenectomised and: - who has an inadequate response to splenectomy, OR - who requires additional chronic intervention to maintain a response post splenectomy where the intervention is associated with unacceptable toxicity; OR - Non splenectomised and who has had an inadequate response to, or is intolerant to, both corticosteroids and immunoglobulins, and in whom splenectomy is contraindicated.

1
Submissions
2010–10
On the record
ICER range
Cost-min
Cost basis

Decision on record

1 decision
  • Meeting Jul 2013 Not recommended Decreased platelet count

Access path

1 submission · public record
  1. TGA registered · ELTROMBOPAG-RZ

    TGA label narrower than the PBS population

  2. Nov 2010
    Recommended

    vs romiplostim

  3. PBS listing · Authority Required
RecommendedDeferredNot recommended

Cost-effectiveness

Cost minimisation analysis presented; no ICER calculated as the submission claimed equi-effectiveness but PBAC rejected this claim due to uncertain clinical effectiveness

The PBAC considered that there was insufficient evidence to draw any reliable conclusions regarding the comparative safety of eltrombopag and romiplostim in patients with chronic ITP. In particular, there were no comparative safety data on the long-term use of these treatments. PBAC · 2010
ICER uncertainEconomic model disputedNo head-to-head trial

Decision context

Populationadult patients with chronic immune (idiopathic) thrombocytopenia purpura (ITP)

Why it was knocked back

  • Uncertain clinical effectiveness compared to romiplostim, considerable uncertainty in indirect comparison due to non-exchangeable trials with differences in patient populations and trial conduct, point estimates favoured romiplostim, non-inferiority margins not defined, insufficient evidence on comparative safety, incomplete cost-minimisation analysis ignoring resource utilisation differences including IVIg use uncertainty

Submission history

1 entries
DecidedOutcomeComparatorICEREvidence
Nov 2010 Recommended romiplostim RCT · Surrogate

Similar precedents

By decision profile

Regulatory · TGA

Label narrower than PBS population — PBAC restricts to splenectomised patients or non-splenectomised with failed corticosteroids/immunoglobulins and contraindicated splenectomy; TGA label broader.