BrigatinibAlunbrig
Locally advanced (Stage IIIB) or metastatic (Stage IV) anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-squamous or not otherwise specified non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients with WHO performance status of 2 or less.
Decision on record
- Meeting Nov 2019 Recommended Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Access path
- TGA registered · Alunbrig
TGA label broader than the PBS population
- Nov 2019Recommended · restricted
vs alectinib
- PBS listing · Restricted
From the public summary
7.1 The PBAC recommended the Authority Required listing of brigatinib as monotherapy for the treatment of patients with locally advanced (Stage IIIB) or metastatic (Stage IV) anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-squamous (NS) or not otherwise specified (NOS) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).PSD · Nov 2019
7.2 The PBAC noted that the existing listings for ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) are line-agnostic and there is a lack of evidence for the optimal sequence of ALK inhibitor therapies in ALK-positive NSCLC and therefore considered that brigatinib should not be precluded from a line-agnostic listing.PSD · Nov 2019
6.43 The submission presented a CMA comparing brigatinib to alectinib. The components and assumptions of the CMA are presented in Table 11.PSD · Nov 2019
Table 11: Summary of key components and assumptions of the cost-minimisation analysis Component Summary Based on evidence presented in the submission, effectiveness is assumed to be non- Therapeutic claim: effectiveness inferior Based on evidence presented in the submission, safety is assumed to be non-inferior, Therapeutic claim: safety with slightly different profile of adverse events Treatment naïve patients:PSD · Nov 2019
Emerging clinical data demonstrate that these therapeutic relativities are likely to hold in both ALK inhibitor naïve and prior TKI (crizotinib) experienced patients.PSD · Nov 2019
6.36 The submission stated that brigatinib provides at least similar efficacy to alectinib for the key clinical outcomes (ORR, DOR, PFS, OS and HRQoL) and is associated with a different but overall non-inferior safety and tolerability profile to that seen with alectinib and other ALK targeted TKIs.PSD · Nov 2019
6.2 The PBAC noted and welcomed the input from individuals (70), health care professionals (1) and organisations (4) via the Consumer Comments facility on the PBS website. The comments described the need for an additional treatment option with new ALK inhibitor to be on the PBS for patients who were concerned about treatment options when they become refractory to the current therapies, highlighting the benefits of treatment with ALK inhibitors that …PSD · Nov 2019
6.3 The PBAC noted the advice received from Lung Foundation Australia and Rare Cancers Australia that the use of brigatinib may provide the added survival and improved quality of life with its high response rate in patients with brain metastases that is very important in this disease as failure to control disease in the brain is often the cause of deterioration in quality of life and eventual mortality in these patients.PSD · Nov 2019
Cost-effectiveness
Cost-minimisation analysis (CMA) was presented; no ICER was calculated as the submission claimed non-inferiority on efficacy and safety basis.
The submission presented a CMA comparing brigatinib to alectinib. PSD · 2019
Decision context
PopulationAdults with locally advanced (Stage IIIB) or metastatic (Stage IV) ALK-positive non-squamous or not otherwise specified NSCLC with WHO performance status of 2 or less, including both treatment-naïve patients and those previously treated with crizotinib.
Submission history
| Decided | Outcome | Comparator | ICER | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2019 | Recommended · restricted | alectinib | — | RCT · PFS |
Clinical evidence
| Trial | Phase | N | Primary outcome | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALTA-1L | Ph 3 | 275 | Progression-free Survival (PFS) | completed |
Codependent tests
| Service | Biomarker | MSAC outcome | Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| FISH test for ALK rearrangement in NSCLC | ALK gene rearrangement | supported | 2019 |
| Small gene panel testing for NSCLC | EGFR, ALK, ROS1, MET exon 14, BRAF, KRAS, RET, NTRK1, NTRK2, NTRK3 | supported | 2022 |
Consumer voice
Consumers and healthcare professionals expressed support for listing brigatinib as an additional ALK inhibitor treatment option, highlighting benefits including longer overall survival, delayed chemotherapy, manageable side effects, and improved quality of life, particularly for patients becoming refractory to current therapies.
The comments described the need for an additional treatment option with new ALK inhibitor to be on the PBS for patients who were concerned about treatment options when they become refractory to the current therapies Consumer comments · PSD
Similar precedents
Regulatory · TGA
Label broader than PBS population — PBAC includes treatment-naïve patients; TGA label restricts to crizotinib-pretreated patients only.