Bictegravir + Emtricitabine + Tenofovir Alafenamide
Recommended · restricted Infectious diseaseAuthority RequiredFirst-line line
Treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) infection in treatment-naïve and virologically suppressed patients.
1
Submissions
2018–18
On the record
—
ICER range
Cost-min
Cost basis
Access path
- Mar 2018Recommended · restricted
vs DESCOVY® (emtricitabine + tenofovir alafenamide) plus…
- PBS listing · Authority Required
RecommendedDeferredNot recommended
From the public summary
PBAC outcome
7.1 The PBAC was of a mind to recommend the Authority Required (STREAMLINED) Section 100 listing for a fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing tenofovir alafenamide with emtricitabine and bictegravir (BFTAF) for the treatment of patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1). However the PBAC deferred making a final recommendation pending the provision of the relevant TGA delegate’s overview.PSD · Mar 2018
7.2 The PBAC considered that the cost-effectiveness of BFTAF would be acceptable if it were cost-minimised against the lowest priced alternative FDC triple-therapy for the treatment of HIV (i.e. tenofovir disproxil-based (TDF) alternatives to the nominated secondary comparators GENVOYA® and ODEFSEY®, STRIBILD® and EVIPLERA®).PSD · Mar 2018
Economic analysis
6.27 The submission stated that the equi-effective doses were based on Trial 1490 regimens. These doses were consistent with the draft PI of BFTAF and available dosages of DESCOVY® plus dolutegravir on the PBS.PSD · Mar 2018
6.28 The submission also stated that given recent PBAC recommendations for FTAF-based regimens were on a cost-minimisation basis, it may be appropriate to describe additional equi-effective doses for BFTAF versus other FTAF regimens (GENVOYA® and ODEFSEY®): one tablet of BFTAF (50mg/200mg/25mg) and one tablet of GENVOYA® (10/200/150//150) are equi-effective one tablet of BFTAF (50mg/200mg/25mg) daily and one tablet of ODEFSEY® (200/25/25) are …PSD · Mar 2018
Clinical claim
6.20 The submission described BFTAF as non-inferior in terms of effectiveness and safety compared with tenofovir alafenamide regimens DESCOVY® + dolutegravir, GENVOYA®, ODEFSEY®.PSD · Mar 2018
6.21 The therapeutic conclusion of non-inferior effectiveness presented in the submission was supported by Trial 1490 for the comparison of BFTAF and DESCOVY® + dolutegravir in treatment-naïve patients given the trial met accepted, pre-specified non-inferiority margins.PSD · Mar 2018
Cost-effectiveness
Cost-minimisation analysis; no ICER calculated. PBAC considered cost-effectiveness would be acceptable if BFTAF were cost-minimised against the lowest priced alternative FDC triple-therapy for HIV treatment.
The PBAC considered that the cost-effectiveness of BFTAF would be acceptable if it were cost-minimised against the lowest priced alternative FDC triple-therapy for the treatment of HIV (i.e. tenofovir disproxil-based (TDF) alternatives to the nominated secondary comparators GENVOYA® and ODEFSEY®, STRIBILD® and EVIPLERA®). PBAC · 2018
Price cut / RSA neededCost-effectiveness accepted
Decision context
PopulationAdults with HIV-1 infection, including treatment-naïve patients and virologically suppressed treatment-experienced patients.
Submission history
| Decided | Outcome | Comparator | ICER | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2018 | Recommended · restricted | DESCOVY® (emtricitabine + tenofovir alafenamide) plus dolutegravir (primary); GENVOYA® and ODEFSEY® (secondary); lowest- | — | RCT · Surrogate |
Similar precedents
Emtricitabine + Tenofovir Alafenamide82%Tenofovir Alafenamide / Emtricitabine82%Elvitegravir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide81%Tenofovir Alafenamide / Emtricitabine / Rilpivirine79%Tenofovir Alafenamide, Emtricitabine, And Rilpivirine79%Atazanavir/Cobicistat75%Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate With Emtricitabine And Rilpivirine Hydrochloride74%Elvitegravir75%