← The record

Bictegravir + Emtricitabine + Tenofovir Alafenamide

Recommended · restricted Infectious diseaseAuthority RequiredFirst-line line

Treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) infection in treatment-naïve and virologically suppressed patients.

1
Submissions
2018–18
On the record
ICER range
Cost-min
Cost basis

Access path

1 submission · public record
  1. Mar 2018
    Recommended · restricted

    vs DESCOVY® (emtricitabine + tenofovir alafenamide) plus…

  2. PBS listing · Authority Required
RecommendedDeferredNot recommended

From the public summary

Verbatim · PSD text · may span indications
PBAC outcome
7.1 The PBAC was of a mind to recommend the Authority Required (STREAMLINED) Section 100 listing for a fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing tenofovir alafenamide with emtricitabine and bictegravir (BFTAF) for the treatment of patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1). However the PBAC deferred making a final recommendation pending the provision of the relevant TGA delegate’s overview.PSD · Mar 2018
7.2 The PBAC considered that the cost-effectiveness of BFTAF would be acceptable if it were cost-minimised against the lowest priced alternative FDC triple-therapy for the treatment of HIV (i.e. tenofovir disproxil-based (TDF) alternatives to the nominated secondary comparators GENVOYA® and ODEFSEY®, STRIBILD® and EVIPLERA®).PSD · Mar 2018
Economic analysis
6.27 The submission stated that the equi-effective doses were based on Trial 1490 regimens. These doses were consistent with the draft PI of BFTAF and available dosages of DESCOVY® plus dolutegravir on the PBS.PSD · Mar 2018
6.28 The submission also stated that given recent PBAC recommendations for FTAF-based regimens were on a cost-minimisation basis, it may be appropriate to describe additional equi-effective doses for BFTAF versus other FTAF regimens (GENVOYA® and ODEFSEY®):  one tablet of BFTAF (50mg/200mg/25mg) and one tablet of GENVOYA® (10/200/150//150) are equi-effective  one tablet of BFTAF (50mg/200mg/25mg) daily and one tablet of ODEFSEY® (200/25/25) are …PSD · Mar 2018
Clinical claim
6.20 The submission described BFTAF as non-inferior in terms of effectiveness and safety compared with tenofovir alafenamide regimens DESCOVY® + dolutegravir, GENVOYA®, ODEFSEY®.PSD · Mar 2018
6.21 The therapeutic conclusion of non-inferior effectiveness presented in the submission was supported by Trial 1490 for the comparison of BFTAF and DESCOVY® + dolutegravir in treatment-naïve patients given the trial met accepted, pre-specified non-inferiority margins.PSD · Mar 2018

Cost-effectiveness

Cost-minimisation analysis; no ICER calculated. PBAC considered cost-effectiveness would be acceptable if BFTAF were cost-minimised against the lowest priced alternative FDC triple-therapy for HIV treatment.

The PBAC considered that the cost-effectiveness of BFTAF would be acceptable if it were cost-minimised against the lowest priced alternative FDC triple-therapy for the treatment of HIV (i.e. tenofovir disproxil-based (TDF) alternatives to the nominated secondary comparators GENVOYA® and ODEFSEY®, STRIBILD® and EVIPLERA®). PBAC · 2018
Price cut / RSA neededCost-effectiveness accepted

Decision context

PopulationAdults with HIV-1 infection, including treatment-naïve patients and virologically suppressed treatment-experienced patients.

Submission history

1 entries
DecidedOutcomeComparatorICEREvidence
Mar 2018 Recommended · restricted DESCOVY® (emtricitabine + tenofovir alafenamide) plus dolutegravir (primary); GENVOYA® and ODEFSEY® (secondary); lowest- RCT · Surrogate

Similar precedents

By decision profile